| Literature DB >> 36235482 |
Moona Nazish1, Ashwaq T Althobaiti2.
Abstract
Pollen morphology of 12 salt-tolerant grasses (Calamagrostis pseudophragmites, Cenchrus biflorus, Cenchrus ciliaris, Cenchrus pennisetiformis, Cymbopogon jwarancusa, Dactyloctenium aegyptium, Echinochloa colona, Echinochloa crus-galli, Saccharum griffithii, Saccharum ravennae, Saccharum spontaneum, and Urochloa ramosa) from the Salt Range was studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and light microscopy (LM). The main aim was the elucidation of taxonomic significance of pollen morphology, which might be useful for taxonomists in the identification of halophytic Poaceae taxa. The described pollen morphology is a good source of taxonomic characteristics that can help in species and genera differentiation. The investigated variations in the pollen micromorphological features and exploration of new palynological traits support and strengthen the systematics of Poaceae. The pollen shape of all studied species was sub-spheroidal, and exine ornamentation includes microechinate-areolate (11 spp.) and microechinate (1 spp.). Two types of pollen apertures were reported, i.e., monoporate (11 spp.) and diporate (Cenchrus pennisetiformis). The annulus was found in all species while operculum was observed only in three species. The univariate and multivariate analyses were used to analyze the quantitative data. The highest pollen viability values (%) depicted the adaptability of Poaceae taxa in the salt region. Overall, the pollen characteristics in polar and equatorial view, apertures, annulus, operculum, and surface ornamentation of pollen grains of the family Poaceae are of great taxonomic significance for the species identification.Entities:
Keywords: SEM; Salt Range; grasses; halophytes; micromorphological characteristics; pollen morphology
Year: 2022 PMID: 36235482 PMCID: PMC9572496 DOI: 10.3390/plants11192618
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Qualitative and quantitative pollen characteristics of salt-tolerant grasses from Northern Punjab, Pakistan.
| Plant Name | Pollen Size | Pollen Shape | Annulus | Operculum | Aperturate | Polar Diameter (µm) Min (Mean ± Std Error) Max | Equatorial Diameter (µm) Min (Mean ± Std Error) Max | P/E Ratio (µm) | Exine Thickness (µm) Min (Mean ± Std Error) Max | Pore Length (µm) Min (Mean ± Std Error) Max | Pore Width (µm) Min (Mean ± Std Error) Max | Sculpturing (SEM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medium | Subspheroidal | + | − | Monoporate | 27.25 (27.85 ± 0.48) 29.75 | 25.50 (26.80 ± 0.54) 28.0 | 1.03 | 1.0 (1.1 ± 0.03) 1.2 | 1.7 (1.94 ± 0.09) 2.2 | 1.8 (1.96 ± 0.05) 2.1 | Microechinate-areolate | |
| Medium | Subspheroidal | + | − | Monoporate | 30.50 (35.5 ± 1.66) 40.25 | 28.0 (33.5 ± 1.60) 37.75 | 1.05 | 0.6 (0.72 ± 0.05) 0.9 | 1.6 (1.86 ± 0.08) 2.1 | 1.7 (1.96 ± 0.08) 2.2 | Microechinate-areolate | |
| Medium | Subspheroidal | + | − | Monoporate | 27.25 (32.75 ± 2.19) 38.0 | 30.25 (34.05 ± 1.83) 40.25 | 0.96 | 0.5 (0.72 ± 0.10) 0.9 | 1.9 (1.99 ± 0.08) 2.3 | 1.8 (1.82 ± 0.06) 2.1 | Microechinate-areolate | |
| Medium | Subspheroidal | + | − | Diporate, Monoporate | 32.50 (38.55 ± 1.58) 41.75 | 43.0 (44.55 ± 0.91) 47.75 | 0.86 | 0.6 (0.72 ± 0.05) 1.1 | 1.6 (1.76 ± 0.05) 1.9 | 1.5 (1.66 ± 0.08) 1.9 | Microechinate-areolate | |
| Medium | Subspheroidal | + | + | Monoporate | 25.50 (31.20 ± 2.19) 38.25 | 29.75 (31.50 ± 0.77) 34.0 | 0.99 | 0.5 (0.64 ± 0.07) 0.9 | 1.6 (1.80 ± 0.07) 2.0 | 1.5 (1.72 ± 0.06) 1.9 | Microechinate | |
| Medium | Subspheroidal | + | + | Monoporate | 23.0 (27.85 ± 1.48) 32.25 | 26.25 (28.65 ± 0.69) 30.25 | 0.97 | 0.9 (1.06 ± 0.05) 1.2 | 1.8 (1.92 ± 0.03) 2.0 | 1.7 (1.80 ± 0.03) 1.9 | Microechinate-areolate | |
| Medium | Subspheroidal | + | + | Monoporate | 25.50 (29.65 ± 1.84) 35.75 | 28.0 (30.35 ± 0.88) 33.25 | 0.97 | 0.9 (1.04 ± 0.06) 1.2 | 1.5 (1.96 ± 0.10) 2.1 | 1.6 (1.86 ± 0.07) 2.0 | Microechinate-areolate | |
| Medium | Subspheroidal | + | − | Monoporate | 22.75 (27.35 ± 1.65) 32.75 | 24.50 (30.05 ± 1.77) 33.50 | 0.91 | 0.6 (0.78 ± 0.09) 1.1 | 1.8 (1.78 ± 0.08) 2.2 | 1.7 (1.84 ± 0.03) 1.9 | Microechinate-areolate | |
| Medium | Subspheroidal | + | − | Monoporate | 26.25 (31.75 ± 1.97) 35.50 | 31.25 (33.85 ± 1.01) 37.25 | 0.93 | 0.5 (0.84 ± 0.12) 1.1 | 1.6 (1.96 ± 0.11) 2.3 | 1.8 (1.94 ± 0.05) 2.1 | Microechinate-areolate | |
| Medium | Subspheroidal | + | − | Monoporate | 24.75 (29.80 ± 2.48) 38.5 | 23.0 (28.70 ± 2.57) 38.0 | 1.03 | 0.6 (0.92 ± 0.10) 1.2 | 1.7 (1.90 ± 0.08) 2.1 | 1.6 (1.80 ± 0.07) 2.0 | Microechinate-areolate | |
| Medium | Subspheroidal | + | − | Monoporate | 20.25 (23.10 ± 1.04) 25.5 | 15.25 (20.95 ± 1.94) 25.25 | 1.10 | 0.7 (0.9 ± 0.08) 1.1 | 1.6 (1.76 ± 0.05) 1.9 | 1.7 (1.78 ± 0.03) 1.9 | Microechinate-areolate | |
| Medium | Subspheroidal | + | − | Monoporate | 22.25 (27.85 ± 2.88) 32.25 | 25.50 (29.60 ± 1.65) 33.75 | 0.94 | 0.6 (0.78 ± 0.05) 0.9 | 1.7 (1.90 ± 0.07) 2.1 | 1.6 (1.78 ± 0.07) 2.0 | Microechinate-areolate |
Figure 1Light microscope pollen micrographs of salt tolerant grasses. (a) Calamagrostis pseudophragmites, (b) Cenchrus biflorus, (c) Cenchrus ciliaris, (d) Cenchrus pennisetiformis, (e) Cymbopogon jwarancusa, (f) Dactyloctenium aegyptium, (g) Echinochloa colona, (h) Echinochloa crus-galli, (i) Saccharum griffithii, (j) Saccharum ravennae, (k) Saccharum spontaneum, (l) Urochloa ramosa.
Figure 2SEM pollen micrographs of salt tolerant grasses. Urochloa ramosa (1–3), Calamagrostis pseudophragmites (4–6), Cenchrus biflorus (7–9).
Figure 3SEM pollen micrographs of salt tolerant grasses. Cenchrus ciliaris (10–13), Cenchrus pennisetiformis (14,15), Cymbopogon jwarancusa (16–18).
Figure 4SEM pollen micrographs of salt tolerant grasses. Dactyloctenium aegyptium (19–21), Echinochloa colona (22–24), Echinochloa crus-galli (25–27).
Figure 5SEM pollen micrographs of salt tolerant grasses. Saccharum griffithii (28–30), Saccharum ravennae (31–33), Saccharum spontaneum (34–36).
Pollen viability and non-viability percentages for salt-tolerant grasses.
| Botanical Name | No. of Viable Pollen | No. of Non-Viable Pollen | Viability (%) | Non-Viability (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95 | 16 | 85.58 | 14.41 | |
| 104 | 23 | 81.88 | 18.11 | |
| 93 | 12 | 88.57 | 11.42 | |
| 113 | 28 | 80.14 | 19.85 | |
| 67 | 8 | 89.33 | 10.66 | |
| 69 | 7 | 90.78 | 9.21 | |
| 113 | 25 | 81.88 | 18.11 | |
| 56 | 15 | 78.87 | 21.12 | |
| 102 | 17 | 85.71 | 14.28 | |
| 62 | 11 | 84.93 | 15.06 | |
| 98 | 9 | 91.58 | 8.41 | |
| 87 | 19 | 82.07 | 17.92 |
Figure 6Principal component analysis (PCA) among the studied salt-tolerant Poaceae species based on palyno-morphological characteristics. (Calamagrostis pseudophragmites, Cenchrus biflorus, Cenchrus ciliaris, Cenchrus pennisetiformis, Cymbopogon jwarancusa, Dactyloctenium aegyptium, Echinochloa colona, Echinochloa crus-galli, Saccharum griffithii, Saccharum ravennae, Saccharum spontaneum, and Urochloa ramosa).
Correlation coefficients for metric variables of principal component analysis (PCA) using palynological characteristics of salt-tolerant grasses.
| Variables | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polar diameter (µm) | 0.4744565 | 0.3249055 | −0.32621870 | 0.43538549 | −0.17548822 | −0.58527955 |
| Equatorial diameter (µm) | 0.5349302 | 0.2709428 | 0.01092927 | 0.25624982 | 0.03831308 | 0.75709210 |
| P/E ratio (µm) | −0.4265074 | −0.1965046 | −0.60566071 | 0.35522178 | −0.45418376 | 0.28317327 |
| Exine thickness (µm) | −0.4201325 | 0.2252430 | 0.53173029 | 0.69077481 | 0.10909227 | −0.03076033 |
| Pore length (µm) | −0.1900636 | 0.6811253 | 0.15652833 | −0.36410765 | −0.58410765 | 0.04107229 |
| Pore width (µm) | −0.3069148 | 0.5174421 | −0.46840025 | −0.09406787 | 0.63903852 | 0.03793646 |
| Eigenvalue | 3.011799883 | 1.532333989 | 0.758921938 | 0.360648574 | 0.333815144 | 0.002480472 |
| Variation (%) | 50.1966647 | 25.5388998 | 12.6486990 | 6.0108096 | 5.5635857 | 0.0413412 |
| Cumulative variance (%) | 50.19666 | 75.73556 | 88.38426 | 94.39507 | 99.95866 | 100.00000 |
Figure 7Map of the study area.
Taxon Sampling and deposition in the herbarium.
| Taxon | Voucher Specimen Number | Collectors | Altitudes (m) | Flowering Period | Locality | District |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISL.129931 | Moona Nazish and Farhat Ullah | 181.00 | May–October | Kalabagh | Mianwali | |
| ISL.129955 | Moona Nazish | 181.03 | July–September | Khewra | Jhelum | |
| ISL.129944 | Moona Nazish | 152.90 | March–October | Khewra | Jhelum | |
| ISL.129959 | Moona Nazish and Farhat Ullah | 153.00 | April–August | Sakesar | Khushab | |
| ISL.129971 | Moona Nazish | 152.90 | June–September | Soon Valley | Khushab | |
| ISL.129953 | Moona Nazish | 182.08 | April–October | Kalabagh | Mianwali | |
| ISL.129980 | Moona Nazish | 169.00 | March–November | Warcha | Khushab | |
| ISL.129970 | Moona Nazish | 151.70 | June–September | Soon Valley | Khushab | |
| ISL.129961 | Moona Nazish | 643.00 | March–August | Kallar Kahar | Chakwal | |
| ISL.129937 | Moona Nazish and Farhat Ullah | 181.10 | April–September | Khewra | Jhelum | |
| ISL.129981 | Moona Nazish | 153.01 | March–September | Sakesar | Khushab | |
| ISL.129973 | Moona Nazish | 169.01 | July–October | Warcha | Khushab |