| Literature DB >> 36235423 |
Agustín Olmedo-Juárez1, Ana Laura Jimenez-Chino2, Alejandro Bugarin3, Alejandro Zamilpa4, Pedro Mendoza-de Gives1, Abel Villa-Mancera5, María Eugenia López-Arellano1, Jaime Olivares-Pérez6, Edgar Jesús Delgado-Núñez7, Manases González-Cortazar4.
Abstract
Pithecellobium dulce (Robx.) Benth is an arboreal legume used in traditional medicine for the treatment of several ailments, including a number of intestinal disorders, and as a natural deworming. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ovicidal activity of a hydroalcoholic extract (HA-E) and its fractions (aqueous, Aq-F and organic, EtOAc-F) from P. dulce leaves, as well as subfractions (C1F1-C17) obtained from EtOAc-F against Haemonchus contortus eggs. The HA-E, Aq-F, and EtOAc-F were assessed at 0.03-5.00 mg/mL and subfractions (C1F1-C17) were assessed at 0.06-1.00 mg/mL. The HA-E and Aq-F showed an ovicidal activity close to 100% at 2.5 mg/mL, and EtOAc-F displayed the highest anthelmintic effect (100% at 0.25 mg/mL). Meanwhile, the sub-fractions with the highest ovicidal effect were C1F6, C1F9, C1F10, C1F11, and CIF13. The main compounds identified in the most active fractions (C1F9, C1F11, and C1F13) were kaempferol (1), quercetin (2), coumaric acid (3), ferulic acid (4), luteolin 7-O-rhamnoside (5), quercetin 3-O-rhamnoside (6), and a caffeoyl derivate (NI). The results indicate that P. dulce leaves exhibit a potent anthelmintic activity and contain bioactive compounds able to inhibit egg hatching in H. contortus. Therefore, this plant could be used for the control of gastrointestinal nematodes in small ruminants.Entities:
Keywords: High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC); Pithecellobium; anthelmintic activity; flavonoids; legume; pinzan
Year: 2022 PMID: 36235423 PMCID: PMC9573131 DOI: 10.3390/plants11192555
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Haemonchus contortus egg hatching inhibition percentage (EHI%) after 48 h exposure to a hydroalcoholic extract and two fractions from Pithecellobium dulce leaves.
| Treatments | Means of Eggs and Larvae (L1 or L2) Recovered | EHI% ± s.d. | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eggs | Larvae | ||
| Distilled water | 7.12 | 119.56 | 3.94 ± 6.61 e |
| Methanol (2%) | 7.25 | 111.68 | 3.99 ± 2.97 e |
| Thiabendazole (0.1 mg/mL) | 105.37 | 0 | 100 a |
| Hydroalcoholic extract (HA-E, mg/mL) | |||
| 5.0 | 99.09 | 2 | 98.57 ± 3.52 a |
| 2.5 | 73.5 | 15.75 | 97.52 ± 5.92 ab |
| 1.25 | 54.87 | 36.37 | 96.21 ± 4.83 ab |
| 0.62 | 114.62 | 5.5 | 95.15 ± 5.56 ab |
| 0.31 | 109.12 | 75.75 | 58.63 ± 10.09 c |
| Aqueous fraction (Aq-F, mg/mL) | |||
| 5.0 | 125.28 | 3.14 | 96.87 ± 4.04 ab |
| 2.5 | 138.36 | 22.18 | 94.42 ± 7.71 ab |
| 1.25 | 151.75 | 1.25 | 98.47 ± 1.87 ab |
| 0.62 | 125.25 | 9.37 | 92.19 ± 7.57 ab |
| 0.31 | 59.37 | 60.12 | 53.53 ± 13.24 c |
| Organic fraction (EtOAc-F, mg/mL) | |||
| 5.0 | 120.08 | 0 | 100 a |
| 2.5 | 107.00 | 0 | 100 a |
| 1.25 | 124.50 | 0 | 100 a |
| 0.62 | 154.62 | 1 | 99.94 ± 0.16 a |
| 0.31 | 129.00 | 0 | 100 a |
| 0.15 | 121.25 | 22.37 | 88.24 ± 13.76 b |
| 0.07 | 61.25 | 173.75 | 25.87 ± 6.06 d |
| 0.03 | 41.51 | 173.75 | 18.95 ± 2.80 d |
abcde Means with different literal in the same column indicate statistical differences (p < 0.05), s.d = standard deviation.
Effective concentrations required to inhibit 50% and 90% of Haemonchus contortus egg hatching after 48 h exposure to a hydroalcoholic extract and two fractions from Pithecellobium dulce leaves.
| Treatments | EC50 | Confidence Interval | EC90 | Confidence Interval | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||
| HA-E | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.18 | 3.34 | 2.84 | 4.04 |
| Aq-F | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.18 | 1.63 | 1.5 | 1.78 |
| EtOAc-F | 0.08 | 0.083 | 0.089 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.14 |
EC = effective concentration, HA-E = hydroalcoholic extract, Aq-F = aqueous fraction, EtOAc-F = organic fraction.
Haemonchus contortus egg hatching inhibition percentage (EHI%) after 48 h exposure to subfractions obtained from the EtOAc fraction from Pithecellobium dulce leaves.
| Subfractions/Controls | Concentration | Means of Eggs and Larvae (L1 or L2) Recovered | EHI% ± s.d. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eggs | Larvae | |||
| C1F6 | 1.00 | 113.25 | 0 | 100 a |
| 0.50 | 111.50 | 0 | 100 a | |
| 0.25 | 97.00 | 20.25 | 83.33 ± 6.68 cd | |
| 0.12 | 34.75 | 71.75 | 33.03 ± 6.87 e | |
| 0.06 | 105.00 | 96.50 | 9.67 ± 5.11 hij | |
| C1F9 | 1.00 | 94.50 | 0 | 100 a |
| 0.50 | 82.00 | 0 | 100 a | |
| 0.25 | 93.37 | 0 | 100 a | |
| 0.12 | 119.5 | 0.75 | 99.50 ± 0.57 a | |
| 0.06 | 115.75 | 16.25 | 88.00 ± 2.58 bc | |
| C1F10 | 1.00 | 44.50 | 0 | 100 a |
| 0.50 | 47.75 | 0 | 100 a | |
| 0.25 | 70.87 | 0 | 100 a | |
| 0.12 | 79.50 | 17.75 | 82.20 ± 3.32 cd | |
| 0.06 | 15.25 | 98.75 | 13.38 ± 0.68 ghi | |
| C1F11 | 1.00 | 85.75 | 0 | 100 a |
| 0.50 | 76.75 | 0 | 100 a | |
| 0.25 | 88.62 | 0 | 100 a | |
| 0.12 | 121.25 | 1.50 | 98.84 ± 0.90 a | |
| 0.06 | 100.25 | 28.50 | 78.15 ± 2.47 cd | |
| C1F13 | 1.00 | 128.25 | 0 | 100 a |
| 0.50 | 95.25 | 0 | 100 a | |
| 0.25 | 87.67 | 0 | 100 a | |
| 0.12 | 116.00 | 0 | 100 a | |
| 0.06 | 96.05 | 26.00 | 78.42 ± 6.42 cd | |
| C1F15 | 1.00 | 54.75 | 9.00 | 85.90 ± 6.48 c |
| 0.50 | 13.00 | 54.50 | 20.00 ± 5.89 fg | |
| 0.25 | 13.87 | 70.75 | 15.64 ± 9.06 fgh | |
| 0.12 | 6.00 | 69.75 | 7.91 ± 8.43 hij | |
| 0.06 | 0.00 | 100.75 | 0.00 j | |
| C1F18 (kaempferol) | 1.0 | 1.25 | 102.25 | 1.27 ± 1.13 j |
| Methanol (2%) | 2% | 6.75 | 67.75 | 8.26 ± 8.50 hij |
| Thiabendazole (0.1 mg/mL) | 0.5% | 12.37 | 100 | 100 a |
abcdefhij Means with different literal in the same column indicate statistical differences (p < 0.05), s.d. = standard deviation.
Effective concentrations required to inhibit 50% and 90% of Haemonchus contortus egg hatching after 48 h exposure to subfractions obtained of the EtOAc fraction.
| Treatments | EC50 | Confidence Interval | EC90 | Confidence Interval | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||
| C1F6 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.31 |
| C1F9 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.07 |
| C1F10 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| C1F11 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.08 |
| C1F13 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.08 |
| C1F15 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.72 | 1.30 | 1.14 | 1.62 |
EC = effective concentration.
Figure 1HPLC analysis of Pithecellobium dulce leaves showing egg hatching inhibition of Haemonchus contortus eggs. (A) hydroalcoholic extract (HA-E), (B) aqueous fraction (Aq-F) and (C) organic fraction (EtOAc-F). Coumaric acid (3) and luteolin 7-O-rhamnoside (5).
Figure 2HPLC analysis of subfractions obtained from EtOAc-F, indicating the presence of kaempferol (1), quercetin (2), coumaric acid (3), ferulic acid (4), luteolin 7-O-rhamnoside (5), quercetin 3-O-rhamnoside (6) and caffeoyl derivate (NI). NI not identified.
Figure 3Structure identified in the bioactive subfractions from Pithecellobium dulce leaves.