| Literature DB >> 36235355 |
Matej Holc1, Miran Mozetič1, Rok Zaplotnik1, Alenka Vesel1, Peter Gselman2, Nina Recek1.
Abstract
This paper investigates the effects of an inductively coupled, radio frequency oxygen plasma on the plant emergence and crop yield of wheat in field growth conditions. Wheat seeds of eight different cultivars were plasma-treated using conditions selected based on preliminary experiments. Additionally, a control sample, as well as seeds treated with fungicide, an eco-layer, or a plasma + eco-layer combination, were planted in parallel. Four cultivars per harvest year were used. Plant emergence (plants/m2) and yield (kg/ha) were followed. There was little variation among the control and the various treatments regarding plant emergence. Regarding yield, there were statistically significant differences, but no discernible trend was seen when comparing the individual treatments. In the case of several cultivars, plasma-treated seeds performed as well as the control, but there was a significant increase in yield only in the case of cultivar 88.5 R. In several cases, yield of plants for plasma-treated seeds was also lower than the control. Our results demonstrate that the response of wheat yield to plasma treatment, as well as to other seed treatments, differs depending on the wheat cultivar.Entities:
Keywords: eco-layer; emergence; field; fungicide; plasma; wheat; yield
Year: 2022 PMID: 36235355 PMCID: PMC9571526 DOI: 10.3390/plants11192489
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
An overview of publications regarding the effects of plasma treatment on wheat yield. CC: capacitively coupled, RF: radio frequency, DBD: dielectric barrier discharge, GR: germination rate, WU: water uptake, S: sprout, R: root, SEM: scanning electron microscopy, ↑: increase, ↓: decrease, unch.: unchanged, n/a: not available.
| Author | Year | Plasma | Gas | Yield | ↑ Yield [%] | Other Effects | Plot | Plot per Condition | Stress | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filatova [ | 2020 | CC RF | air | 200 | ↑ yield, ↑ 1000-grain weight | 2.3 | unch./↓ GR, ↑ S/R, ↓ % fungal inf., ↓ disease severity (field) | field | 25 m2 | fungi |
| Hasan [ | 2022 | DBD | air | 1333 | ↑ yield (g/m2), ↑ 1000-grain weight, ↑ grains/spike | 27.06 | etching, cracks (SEM), ↑ GR, ↑ S/R, ↑ growth, ↑ chlorophyll, biochem. changes, enzyme activity | field | 4 m2 | n/a |
| Hui [ | 2020 | CC RF | air/He | 130–160 | ↑ yield (theoretical, actual) (kg/plot), unch, 1000-grain weight, unch. grains/spike, unch. spikes/plot | 8.12 | ↑ GR (1st gen.), ↑ S, unch. R, ↑ growth | field | 660 m2 | n/a |
| Jiang [ | 2014 | CC RF | He | 150 | ↑ yield (t/ha) | 5.9 | ↑ GR, ↑ R, ↑ growth, ↑ chlorophyll | field | 6 ha | n/a |
| Roy [ | 2017 | glow | air, air/O2 | 1333 | ↑ yield (t/ha), ↑ length of spike, ↑ spikelets/spike, ↑ grains/spike, ↑ 1000-grain weight | ~20 | altered surface (SEM), ↑ WU, ↑ GR, ↑ plant length, ↑ growth, ↑ chlorophyll | field | n/a | n/a |
| Roy [ | 2018 | gliding arc | air/O2/H2O | atm | ↑ yield (g/m2), ↑ length of spike, ↑ spikelets/spike, ↑ grains/spike, ↑ 1000-grain weight | ~20 | ↑ WU, ↑ GR, ↑/unch. plant length, ↑ growth, ↑ chlorophyll | field | 5 m2 | n/a |
| Saberi [ | 2018 | CC RF | air | 10 | ↑ yield (grain, biological) (g/m2), ↑ 1000-grain weight | 31.62 | ↑ photosynthesis, biochem. changes | field | 20 rows, | n/a |
| Saberi [ | 2019 | CC RF | air | low | ↑ yield (grain, spike) (g/plant) | 58 | ↑ photosynthesis, biochem. changes | greenhouse | 3 pots, 3 seedlings /pot | haze |
| Sohan [ | 2021 | glow | air, Ar/O2 | 1333 | ↑ 1000-grain weight | n/a | etching (SEM), ↑ GR, ↑ S/R, ↑ growth, ↑ chlorophyll, biochem. changes, enzyme activity | field | 4 m2 | n/a |
| Zhang [ | 2018 | CC RF | air, air/He | 30–200 | ↑ 1000-grain weight, ↑ grains/spike | n/a | ↑ GR, ↑ S/R, ↑ growth parameters, enzyme activity | field | n/a | drought |
Figure 1The number of emerged plants per m2 according to individual treatments and cultivars in the year 2019/20. The error bars represent standard error. Different lowercase letters above data points represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05; post hoc Tukey’s range test) between treatments.
Figure 2The number of emerged plants per m2 according to individual treatments and cultivars in the year 2020/21. The error bars represent standard error. Different lowercase letters above data points represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05; post hoc Tukey’s range test) between treatments.
Figure 3Yield results (kg/ha) of the field experiment according to individual treatments and cultivars of wheat in the year 2019/20. The error bars represent standard error. Different lowercase letters above data points represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05; post hoc Tukey’s range test) between treatments.
Figure 4Yield results (kg/ha) of the field experiment according to individual treatments and cultivars of wheat in the year 2020/21. The error bars represent standard error. Different lowercase letters above data points represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05; post hoc Tukey’s range test) between treatments.
Figure 5Correlation between plant emergence / m2 and yield (kg/ha) of the field experiments in the years (a) 2019/20 and (b) 2020/21.
Figure 6Schematic representation of industrial plasma reactor used to treat wheat seeds.