| Literature DB >> 36235060 |
Xiao-Han Tian1,2, Tian-Ya Zhou1,2, Yu Meng1,2, Yi-Ming Zhao1,2, Chao Shi1, Peng-Xiang Hou1,2, Li-Li Zhang1,2, Chang Liu1,2, Hui-Ming Cheng1,3.
Abstract
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are considered a promising candidate for the detection of toxic gases because of their high specific surface area and excellent electrical and mechanical properties. However, the detecting performance of CNT-based detectors needs to be improved because covalently bonded CNTs are usually chemically inert. We prepared a nitrogen-doped single-wall CNT (SWCNT) film by means of gas-phase fluorination followed by thermal annealing in NH3. The doped nitrogen content could be changed in the range of 2.9-9.9 at%. The N-doped SWCNT films were directly used to construct flexible and transparent gas sensors, which can work at a low voltage of 0.01 V. It was found that their NO2 detection performance was closely related to their nitrogen content. With an optimum nitrogen content of 9.8 at%, a flexible sensor had a detection limit of 500 ppb at room temperature with good cycling ability and stability during bending.Entities:
Keywords: flexible sensor; nitrogen doping; single-wall carbon nanotube
Year: 2022 PMID: 36235060 PMCID: PMC9573668 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27196523
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1(a) Schematic showing the N–doping process of SWCNTs. (b) Typical SEM image of the as-prepared N–SWCNT film. (c) Typical TEM image of the N–SWCNTs.
Figure 2(a) Raman and (b) XPS spectra of SWCNT, F–SWCNT and N–SWCNT films. (c) C 1 s curves of the F–SWCNT film. (d) C 1 s curves of the N–SWCNT film.
Figure 3(a) SIMS spectrum of a F–SWCNT film showing the existence of N2O molecules. (b) N 1 s XPS spectra of a F–SWCNT film. (c) N 1 s XPS spectra of a N–SWCNT film. (d) Dependence of the N–doping content on the degree of fluorination of the SWCNTs.
Figure 4(a) Responsivity of the sensors exposed to 10 ppm NO2. (b–d) Sensing performance of the sensors exposed to different concentrations of NO2.
Figure 5(a) Responsivity vs. concentration plot of the three sensors exposed to different concentrations of NO2. (b) Sensitivity of the 9.8-sensor (red line), 9.8-sensor after 30 bending (black line), and 9.8-sensor-upon-quick-cycling (blue line) exposed to 0.5–10 ppm NO2. (c) Sensing performance of 9.8-sensor and 9.8-sensor-10 exposed to different concentrations of NO2. (d) Cycling performance of 9.8-sensor-10 in 1 ppm NO2.