| Literature DB >> 36234933 |
Muhammad Adeel Asghar1, Sana Ibadat1, Saghir Abbas2, Talha Nisar3, Veit Wagner3, Muhammad Zubair1, Irfan Ullah1, Saqib Ali1,4, Ali Haider1,4.
Abstract
Developing a cost-effective, efficient, and stable oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalyst is of great importance for sustainable energy conversion and storage. In this study, we report a facile one-step fabrication of cationic surfactant-assisted Prussian blue analogues (PBAs) Mx[Fe(CN)5CH3C6H4NH2]∙yC19H34NBr abbreviated as SF[Fe-Tol-M] (where SF = N-tridecyl-3-methylpyridinium bromide and M = Mn, Co and Ni) as efficient heterogeneous OER electrocatalysts. The electrocatalysts have been characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) coupled with energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). In the presence of cationic surfactant (SF), PBAs-based electrodes showed enhanced redox current, high surface area and robust stability compared to the recently reported PBAs. SF[Fe-Tol-Co] hybrid catalyst shows superior electrochemical OER activity with a much lower over-potential (610 mV) to attain the current density of 10 mA cm-2 with the Tafel slope value of 103 mV·dec-1 than that for SF[Fe-Tol-Ni] and SF[Fe-Tol-Mn]. Moreover, the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) unveiled that SF[Fe-Tol-Co] exhibits smaller charge transfer resistance, which results in a faster kinetics towards OER. Furthermore, SF[Fe-Tol-Co] offered excellent stability for continues oxygen production over extended reaction time. This work provides a surface assisted facile electrode fabrication approach for developing binder-free OER electrocatalysts for efficient water oxidation.Entities:
Keywords: binder-free catalysts; electrocatalysis; oxygen evolution reaction; prussian blue analogues; surfactants; water oxidation
Year: 2022 PMID: 36234933 PMCID: PMC9571080 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27196396
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1(a) XPS spectra of [Fe-NH3] and SF[Fe-Tol-Co] for Fe, (b) XPS spectrum of SF[Fe-Tol-Co] for Co, (c) overlaid UV-visible spectra of [Fe-NO], [Fe-NH3] and [Fe-Tol], (d) overlaid FT-IR spectra of [Fe-NO], [Fe-NH3], [Fe-Tol] and SF[Fe-Tol-M] and (e) XRD patterns for [Fe-NH3], [Fe-Tol] and SF[Fe-Tol-M] (where M = Mn, Co, Ni).
Figure 2SEM image of the (a) SF[Fe-Tol-Co], (b) SF[Fe-Tol-Ni], (c) SF[Fe-Tol-Mn].
Figure 3(a) Linear sweep voltammograms of bare GCE and SF[Fe-Tol-M], (b) Tafel plots of SF[Fe-Tol-M], (c) cyclic voltammograms of SF[Fe-Tol-Co] in the non-faradaic potential region at the scan rates ranging from 20 to 160 mV·s−1, (d) charging currents measured at the potentials 0.25 V vs. Ag/AgCl plotted as a function of scan rates for SF[Fe-Tol-Co], (e) Nyquist plots of SF[Fe-Tol-M] in the frequency range from 100 mHz to 100 kHz and (f) chronopotentiometric measurement for SF[Fe-Tol-Co] performed to generate constant current density of 5 mV·cm−2 for 24 h.
Cdl, ECSA, and RF values for SF[Fe-Tol-M].
| Sample Code | Capacitance (Cdl) (µF) | ECSA (cm2) | Roughness Factor (RF) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SF[Fe-Tol-Co] | 11.65 | 0.58 | 19.33 |
| SF[Fe-Tol-Ni] | 10.10 | 0.50 | 16.67 |
| SF[Fe-Tol-Mn] | 4.50 | 0.22 | 7.33 |