| Literature DB >> 36234912 |
Aleksandra Wypych-Puszkarz1, Onur Cetinkaya1,2, Jiajun Yan3, Ruslana Udovytska1, Jarosław Jung1, Jacek Jenczyk4, Grzegorz Nowaczyk4, Stefan Jurga4, Jacek Ulański1, Krzysztof Matyjaszewski1,3, Joanna Pietrasik5, Marcin Kozanecki1.
Abstract
Core-shell nanocomposites comprising barium titanate, BaTiO3 (BTO), and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) chains grafted from its surface with varied grafting densities were prepared. BTO nanocrystals are high-k inorganic materials, and the obtained nanocomposites exhibit enhanced dielectric permittivity, as compared to neat PMMA, and a relatively low level of loss tangent in a wide range of frequencies. The impact of the molecular dynamics, structure, and interactions of the BTO surface on the polymer chains was investigated. The nanocomposites were characterized by broadband dielectric and vibrational spectroscopies (IR and Raman), transmission electron microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and nuclear magnetic resonance. The presence of ceramic nanoparticles in core-shell composites slowed down the segmental dynamic of PMMA chains, increased glass transition temperature, and concurrently increased the thermal stability of the organic part. It was also evidenced that, in addition to segmental dynamics, local β relaxation was affected. The grafting density influenced the self-organization and interactions within the PMMA phase, affecting the organization on a smaller size scale of polymeric chains. This was explained by the interaction of the exposed surface of nanoparticles with polymer chains.Entities:
Keywords: dielectric properties; molecular dynamics; nanocomposites; polymer brushes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36234912 PMCID: PMC9571223 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27196372
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Sample specification of PMMA and core–shell BTO-g-PMMA composites based on barium titanate core of 200 nm size; (finorg = percentage of inorganic component).
| Sample Name | PMMA | PMMA | Grafting Density | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| PMMA | 3.50 × 105 | 1.17 | - | 0% | 91 | 137 |
| BTO- | 1.52 × 105 | 1.77 | 1.25 | 33% | 103.5 | 144 |
| BTO- | 1.85 × 105 | 2.38 | 0.43 | 54% | 109 | 142 |
| BTO- | 3.18 × 105 | 1.38 | 0.18 | 62% | 111 | 142 |
Figure 13D map (frequency–temperature dependences of dielectric loss (ε”)) for BTO-g-PMMA (0.43). The solid red lines, drawn as a guide for eyes only, indicate relaxation processes.
Figure 2Frequency dependence of real part of dielectric permittivity (a) and loss tangent (b) for BTO-g-PMMA nanocomposites determined at 20 °C.
Figure 3Frequency dependence of imaginary part of dielectric permittivity (a) and its normalized curves (b) for BTO-g-PMMA core–shell composites collected at 80 °C.
Havriliak–Negami (HN) parameters for β-relaxation processes in studied BTO-g-PMMA composites obtained from analysis of dielectric spectra at 80 °C. The data for neat PMMA was added for comparison.
| Sample | τ (s) | τmax (s) | Δε | αHN | βHN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMMA | 4.9 × 10−4 | 1.4 × 10−4 | 2.13 | 0.52 | 0.51 |
| BTO- | 5.4 × 10−4 | 1.6 × 10−4 | 2.72 | 0.53 | 0.51 |
| BTO- | 6.4 × 10−4 | 1.7 × 10−4 | 3.83 | 0.53 | 0.47 |
| BTO- | 5.7 × 10−4 | 1.5 × 10−4 | 4.87 | 0.53 | 0.48 |
Figure 4Arrhenius plot for the core–shell BTO-g-PMMA composites performed from BDS experiments. Data for PMMA were added for comparison.
Activation energies of local relaxations calculated for neat PMMA and BTO-g-PMMA core–shell composites.
| Sample’s Name | EA of β Relaxation | |
|---|---|---|
| PMMA | 81.9 ± 0.9 | 57 |
| BTO- | 85.7 ± 1.3 | 47 |
| BTO- | 79.1 ± 0.4 | 57 |
| BTO- | 78.3 ± 0.6 | γ not visible |
Figure 5Comparison of the 13C CP/MAS NMR spectra recorded for BTO-g-PMMA (0.18)—(green), BTO-g-PMMA (0.43)—(blue), BTO-g-PMMA (1.25)—(red) and neat PMMA—(black). Signals marked with asterisks indicate rotational sidebands.
Figure 6Deconvoluted NMR data and individual Lorentzian components half-width analysis.
Figure 7ATR FTIR spectra of BaTiO3, PMMA, and PMMA-g-BTO composites.
Figure 8ATR FT-IR spectra of PMMA-g-BTO nanocomposites at the regions of C=O and C–O–C stretching vibrations. All spectra were normalized to the intensity (signal amplitude) of the line with a maximum at 750 cm−1. Inset in the middle part of the chart shows changes in the positions of the characteristic line maxima vs. BTO percentage.
Figure 9Raman spectra of BTO-g-PMMA nanocomposites at some selected regions.