| Literature DB >> 36234910 |
Piyush Kashyap1, Mamta Thakur2, Nidhi Singh3, Deep Shikha4, Shiv Kumar5, Poonam Baniwal6, Yogender Singh Yadav7, Minaxi Sharma8, Kandi Sridhar9, Baskaran Stephen Inbaraj10.
Abstract
The recent coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in Wuhan, China, has led to millions of infections and the death of approximately one million people. No targeted therapeutics are currently available, and only a few efficient treatment options are accessible. Many researchers are investigating active compounds from natural plant sources that may inhibit COVID-19 proliferation. Flavonoids are generally present in our diet, as well as traditional medicines and are effective against various diseases. Thus, here, we reviewed the potential of flavonoids against crucial proteins involved in the coronavirus infectious cycle. The fundamentals of coronaviruses, the structures of SARS-CoV-2, and the mechanism of its entry into the host's body have also been discussed. In silico studies have been successfully employed to study the interaction of flavonoids against COVID-19 Mpro, spike protein PLpro, and other interactive sites for its possible inhibition. Recent studies showed that many flavonoids such as hesperidin, amentoflavone, rutin, diosmin, apiin, and many other flavonoids have a higher affinity with Mpro and lower binding energy than currently used drugs such as hydroxylchloroquine, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and lopinavir. Thus, these compounds can be developed as specific therapeutic agents against COVID-19, but need further in vitro and in vivo studies to validate these compounds and pave the way for drug discovery.Entities:
Keywords: ACE2; COVID-19; Mpro; flavonoids; in silico studies
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36234910 PMCID: PMC9572657 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27196374
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1Flavonoids’ basic structure and various flavonoids involved in counteracting coronavirus.
Figure 2Basic structure of SARS-CoV-2 and its interaction with the host cell. ACE2, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Figure 2 is available under an open-access Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY).
Figure 3The 3D structure of the spike protein (a) and 3CL protease (b) of SARS-CoV-2.
Figure 4Summary of potential approaches to control SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Figure 5Systematic representation of the mechanism of flavonoid inhibition against SARS-CoV-2. Figure 4 is available under an open-access Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY).
Figure 6(A) Binding mode of Mpro with quercetin via amino acid interactions and (B) binding mode of spike protein and quercetin via amino acid interactions. Adapted with permission from Vijai kumar et al. [113].
Recent in silico studies of flavonoids against COVID-19.
| Methods | No. of Compounds Tested | Structure | Description | Binding Affinity for Molecules (Kcal/mol) | Results | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWISS DOCK | 35 | 6LU7 |
Anti-viral drugs and 35 compounds were screened against chymotyripsin-like protease (3CLpro). UCSF chimera was used to visualize the interaction (hydrophobic bonds and H-bonds) between ligands and the amino acid of the targeted protein. ProTox was used to evaluate toxicity. |
Cordifolin: −8.77 Anisofolin A: −8.72 Apigenin-7-glycoside: −8.36 Luteolin: −8.35 Laballenic acid: −8.13 Quercetin: −8.04 Luteolin-4-glucoside: −7.87 |
Apigenin-7-glycoside, luteolin, quercetin, and luteolin-4-glucoside showed least binding energy, meaning higher binding affinity with amino acids of protease. | [ |
| Auto Dock Vina | 19 | 6LU7 (main protease (Mpro)) |
Molecular docking approach was used to study inhibition of two COVID-19 proteins, i.e., main protease (Mpro) and spike glycoprotein by bioactive compounds. Lipinski’s rule of five was used to determine the efficacy of compounds as potential drugs. Nelfinavir, chloroquine, and hydroxyl chloroquine sulfate drugs were used as positive controls. |
Hesperidin: −10.4 (spike glycoprotein), −8.3 (main protease) Nabiximols: −10.2 (spike glycoprotein), −8.0 (main protease) Pectolinarin: −9.8 (spike glycoprotein), −8.2 (main protease) Epigallocatechin gallate: −9.8 (spike glycoprotein), −7.8 (main protease) Rhoifolin: −9.5 (spike glycoprotein), 8.2 (main protease) |
Hesperidine, cannabinoids, pectolinarin, epigallocatechin gallate. and rhoifolin showed better inhibitory activity for spike glycoprotein than control drugs. Hesperidine, cannabinoids, pectolinarin, and rhoifolin showed better inhibitory activity for main protease (Mpro) than chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine sulfate drugs and almost similar to nelfinavir. However, hesperidine, pectolinarin, and rhoifolindonot follow Lipinski’s rule. Low bioavailability of some compounds, i.e., hesperidine, cannabinoids, and rhoifolin, may pose a problem during drug design. | [ |
| MOE2010 | -- | 6LU7 (main protease (Mpro)) |
Compounds evaluated: Curcuminoids from Methoxy flavonoids from Phenolic compounds from Phenylpropanoid compounds from Three protein targets were selected: Receptor binding domain of spike protein (RBD-S). Angiotension converting enzyme-2 receptor at protease domain (PD-ACE2). Main protease (Mpro). Docking score was used to evaluate binding affinity. |
Curcumin: −11.82 (main protease), −8.39 (spike glycoprotein), −9.04 (RBD-ACE2) Hesperitin: −12.36 (main protease), −9.08 (spike glycoprotein), −6.72 (RBD-ACE2) Hesperidin: −13.51 (main protease), −9.61 (spike glycoprotein), −9.50 (RBD-ACE2) Naringenin: −12.44 (main protease), −7.40 (spike glycoprotein), −7.69 (RBD-ACE2) Brazilin: −12.36 (main protease), −7.50 (spike glycoprotein), −7.49 (RBD-ACE2) Galangin: −12.96 (main protease), −7.89 (spike glycoprotein), −7.60 (RBD-ACE2) |
Hesperidin showed lowest binding energy for all three protein targets, i.e., −13.51 (main protease), −9.61 (RBD-S) and −9.50 (PD-ACE2). Docking score of hesperidin is less than lopinavir, meaning better interaction with protein targets. Other compounds also showed good affinity compared to reference compounds, but less than hesperidin. Citrus compounds showed better potential in inhibiting the development of COVID-19 followed by | [ |
| ClusPro (docking between spike protein fragment and human ACE2 receptor) | 5 |
Herperidin, emodin, anthroquinone, rhein, and chrysin phytochemicals were used in this study. |
Hesperidin: −8.99 Emodin: −6.19 Anthroquinone: −6.15 Rhein: −8.73 Chrysin: −6.87 |
Hesperidin, emodin, and chrysin are considered as potential candidates to treat COVID-19. Hesperidin binds with the amino acids of the H1 and H2 helix of the ACE2 receptor protein. Emodin binds with the amino acids of the H2 helix of the ACE2 receptor protein. Anthroquinone and rhein are not considered as therapeutic agents against COVID-19 because of no interactions. Chrysin interacts with the amino acids of the H5 helix of the ACE2 receptor protein. | [ | |
| Autodock 4.2 | 13 | 6LU7 |
Docking score and binding energy were used to evaluate binding affinity. Lipinski’s rule of five was used to determine the efficacy of compounds as potential drugs. |
Kaempferol: −8.58 Quercitin: −8.47 Luteolin-7-glucoside: −8.17 Demethoxycurcumin: −7.99 Naringenin: −7.89 Apigenin-7-glucoside: −7.83 Oleuropein: −7.31 Curcumin: −7.05 Catechin: −7.24 Epicatechin-gallate: −6.67 |
Mpro of COVID-19 shares 96% similarity with Mpro of SARS-CoV. Order of inhibition potential of selected compounds: nelfinavir > lopanavir > kaemferol > quercetin > luteolin-7-glucoside > demethoxycurcumin > naringenin > apigenin-7-glucoside > oleuropein > curcumin > catechin > epigallocatechin > zinger > allicin. All the compounds follow Lipinski’s rule of five. | [ |
| Auto Dock Vina | 72 | 6LU7 |
3CL pro was used as the active site for docking. Binding energy was calculated for checking binding affinity. ADME and toxicology of flavonoids were also performed. |
Amentoflavone: −9.0 Gallocatechingallate: −8.3 Diosmin: −9 Epigallocatechin gallate: −8.3 Hidrosmin: −8.9 Catechingallate: −8.4 Elsamitrucin: −8.3 Pectolinaren: −8.3 Silibinin: −8.1 Oriemtim: −8.0 Isoquercetin= −8.0 |
All the flavonoids except auraptene have binding energy <−6 kcal/mol. Top ten flavonoids with lowest binding energy. The majority of flavonoids also had high predicted probabilities of being toxic to fathead minnows (FHM), honey bees (HBT), and Tetrahymena pyriformis (TPT), which should not be a concern for humans as they are all commonly consumed flavonoids. | [ |
| Auto Dock Vina | 14 | 6LU7 |
Mpro was used as the active site for docking. Polar H-bond was added to Mpro before docking followed by the addition of Kollman charges. Pymol 4.3.0, Ligplot+, and protein–ligand interaction profiler was used to analyze docking results. |
Hesperidin Rutin Diosmin Apiin Diacetylcurcumin |
Procyanidin b2 and mangiferin showed highest binding affinity with Mpro with binding energy of −9.4 Kcal/mol and −8.5 Kcal/mol, respectively. Azithromycin, an antibiotic, showed lowest binding energy, i.e., −13.4 kcal/mol. Both flavonoids form multiple H-bonds with the main chain of the residue in the substrate binding pocket, which inhibits the binding site of the inhibitor. Both flavonoids have binding affinity greater than hydroxyquinone, flavipiravir, and ramdesivir. | [ |
| Swiss Dock | 18 | 6LU7 |
18 compounds were extracted from 11 different species. Main focus was given to compounds that possess anti-malarial or anti-viral activity. Lipophilicity (log P) and aqueous solubility (log S) were calculated using ALOGPS 2.1 program. |
Nictoflorin: −9.18 Astragalin: −8.68 Lupeol: −8.28 Aloenin: −9.13 Aloesin: −8.79 Berberine: −8.67 Sitosterol: −8.42 Curcumin: −8.44 |
Harsingar, Aloe vera, and giloy herbal plant compounds showed maximum affinity to Mpro of COVID-19. Nictofloein (−9.18 kcal/mol), astragalin (−8.68 kcal/mol), and lupeol (−8.28 kcal/mol) were extracted from harsingar; aloenin (−9.13 kcal/mol) and aloesin (−8.79 kcal/mol) were extracted from Aloe Vera; berbirine (−8.67 kcal/mol) and sitosterol (−8.42 kcal/mol) were extracted from giloy. Most compounds have log-P values in the range of 2.64–4.95. Lupeol, sitosterol, ursolic acid, and cannabidiol have log-P in the range of 5.12–7.27, which means they possess high hydrophobicity and poor absorption, whereas nictoflowin, astragalin, aloenin, aloesin, and quercetin have log-P (0.05–1.81), which means high absorption. Most compounds’ log-S value was in the range of −1 to −5, which implies less bioavailability. Nictoflowin, astragalin, aloenin, aloesin, and quercetin were considered as more biologically potent compounds asprotease inhibitors, as well as having good bioavailability. | [ |
| Auto Dock Vina | 7173 purchasable drugs and 4574 unique compounds and their stereoisomers | 2DUC |
High-resolution apoenzyme stricture of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro was used as the template. MTiopen screen web service was used for screening compounds. |
Diosmin: −10.1 Hesperidin: −10.1 MK-3207: −10.1 Venetoclax: −10.0 Dihydroergocristine: −9.8 Bolazine: −9.8 R428: −9.8 Ditercalinium: −9.8 Etoposide-phosphate: −9.8 |
Hesperidin and diosmin fit well in the docking site and block the active site of the virus. Hesperidin and its 38 different stereoisomeric forms all were among the top scores. Good inhibitor of SARS-CoV 3CLpro with an IC50 value of 8.3 µM, whereas some of the mild adverse reactions of these flavonoids were also reported, such as stomach pain and nausea, | [ |