| Literature DB >> 36234867 |
Ping Zhang1, Tehreem Munawar2, Raya Soltane3,4, Mohsin Javed2, Guocong Liu1, Shahid Iqbal1, Muhammad Azam Qamar2, Ayed A Dera5, Hamad Alrbyawi6, M Alfakeer7, Sameh Rabea8, Eslam B Elkaeed8.
Abstract
There has been a lot of interest in the manufacture of stable, high-efficiency photocatalysts. In this study, initially Cr doped ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles (NPs) were made via surfactant-assisted hydrothermal technique. Then Cr-ZnFe2O4 NPs were modified by incorporating S-g-C3N4 to enhance their photocatalytic efficiency. The morphological, structural, and bonding aspects were analyzed by XRD, FTIR, and SEM techniques. The photocatalytic efficiency of the functional Cr-ZnFe2O4/S-g-C3N4 (ZFG) heterostructure photocatalysts was examined against MB under sunlight. The produced ZFG-50 composite has the best photocatalytic performance, which is 2.4 and 3.5 times better than that of ZnFe2O4 and S-g-C3N4, respectively. Experiments revealed that the enhanced photocatalytic activity of the ZFG nanocomposite was caused by a more effective transfer and separation of photo-induced charges. The ZFG photocatalyst can use sunlight for treating polluted water, and the proposed modification of ZnFe2O4 using Cr and S-g-C3N4 is efficient, affordable, and environmentally benign. Under visible light, Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria were employed to ZFG-50 NCs' antimicrobial activity. These ZFG-50 NCs also exhibit excellent antibacterial potential.Entities:
Keywords: S-g-C3N4; hydrothermal method; nanocomposite; photocatalyst; polluted water
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36234867 PMCID: PMC9571418 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27196330
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1Schematic representation for the synthesis of Cr-ZnFe2O4/S-g-C3N4.
Composition of the synthesized Cr-ZnFe2O4/S-g-C3N4composites.
| Sr. No. | Cr-ZnFe2O4 (wt. %) | S-g-C3N4 | 7% Cr-ZnFe2O4/S-g-C3N4 | Nanocomposites Code |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | 100 | S-g-C3N4 | SG |
| 2 | 100 | - | ZnFe2O4 | ZF |
| 3 | 50 | 10 | 7% Cr-ZnFe2O4/10S-g-C3N4 | ZFG10 |
| 4 | 50 | 30 | 7% Cr-ZnFe2O4/30S-g-C3N4 | ZFG30 |
| 5 | 50 | 50 | 7% Cr-ZnFe2O4/50S-g-C3N4 | ZFG50 |
| 6 | 50 | 60 | 7% Cr-ZnFe2O4/60S-g-C3N4 | ZFG60 |
| 7 | 50 | 70 | 7% Cr-ZnFe2O4/70S-g-C3N4 | ZFG70 |
Figure 2XRD spectrum of composites of ZnFe2O4, S-g-C3N4, 7% Cr-ZnFe2O4, 7% Cr-ZnFe2O4/S-g-C3N4.
Figure 3(a) SEM profile of S-g-C3N4, TEM profiles of (b) S-g-C3N4, (c) ZnFe2O4, (d) 7% Cr-ZnFe2O4, and (e) 7% Cr-ZnFe2O4/50S-g-C3N4 NCs. (f) EDX of 7% Cr-ZnFe2O4/50S-g-C3N4 NCs.
Figure 4FTIR Spectrum of composites of ZnFe2O4, S-g-C3N4, 7% Cr-ZnFe2O4, 7% Cr-ZnFe2O4/S-g-C3N4.
Figure 5Photocatalytic activity of Cr-ZnFe2O4 NPs against MB (a) % Degradation of MB by Cr-ZnFe2O4 NPs (b).
Figure 6Photocatalytic degradation rate (a); % degradation (b); kinetic characteristics (c); and the rate constant (k) values of degradation of MB by ZFG NCs (d).
The rate constant (k) values of the ZFG nanocomposites.
| Sr. No. | Nanocomposites | S-g-C3N4 | k (min−1) | Nanocomposites Code |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S-g-C3N4 | 100 | 0.0021 | SG |
| 2 | ZnFe2O4 | - | 0.0024 | ZF |
| 3 | 7% Cr-ZnFe2O4/10S-g-C3N4 | 10 | 0.0028 | ZFG10 |
| 4 | 7% Cr-ZnFe2O4/30S-g-C3N4 | 30 | 0.0034 | ZFG30 |
| 5 | 7% Cr-ZnFe2O4/50S-g-C3N4 | 50 | 0.0058 | ZFG50 |
| 6 | 7% Cr-ZnFe2O4/60S-g-C3N4 | 60 | 0.0051 | ZFG60 |
| 7 | 7% Cr-ZnFe2O4/70S-g-C3N4 | 70 | 0.0047 | ZFG70 |
Comparison of the ZFG-50 NCs’ photocatalytic effectiveness with some earlier research.
| Scheme | Photocatalyst | Contaminant | Light Source | Radiation Time (min.) | Degradation % | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ZnNdxFe2−xO4 | Rhodamine B | Xe lamp | 180 | 98 | [ |
| 2 | N-ZnO/g-C3N4 | MB | Xe lamp | 90 | 100 | [ |
| 3 | Mn-ZnO/CSAC | BG | Solar | 120 | 97.47 | [ |
| 4 | ZnFe2O4 | Toluene | Xe lamp | 300 | 57.2 | [ |
| 5 | ZnO/ZnFe2O4 | 100 | 98 | [ | ||
| 5 | Pt-BiFeO3 | MG | Solar | 240 | 96 | [ |
| 7 | g-C3N4/BiOI | RhB | Visible | 120 | 99 | [ |
| 8 | ZnFe2O4@ZnO | MO | Visible | 240 | 99 | [ |
| 9 | ZFG-50 | MB | Solar | 90 | 100 | Present Work |
Figure 7(a) Cyclic stability of the ZFG-50 NCs photocatalysts through the fourth cycle and (b) EIS Nyquist plots of ZnFe2O4, Cr-ZnFe2O4, and ZFG-50.
Figure 8A schematic MB sunlight catalytic degradation mechanism over the ZFG NCs.
Bactericidal proficiency of ZnFe2O4, Cr-ZnFe2O4, and ZFG-50 NCs.
| Antimicrobial Agent | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative control | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive control | 18.2 | 20.2 | 23.1 | 19.2 |
| ZnFe2O4 | 7.7 | 6 | 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Cr-ZnFe2O4 | 12.8 | 11 | 13.8 | 11.7 |
| ZFG-50 | 21.6 | 16.9 | 22.8 | 21.6 |
Figure 9Zones of inhibition of the ZnFe2O4, Cr-ZnFe2O4, and ZFG-50 against the employed bacterial strains.