| Literature DB >> 36234807 |
Wenjing Liu1,2, Bing Liang1, Jun Zeng1,2, Jingsen Meng1,2, Lingyu Shi1,2, Shanbo Yang1,2, Jing Chang1,2, Chao Wang1, Xiaokun Hu3, Xufu Wang4, Na Han4, Chenghui Lu4, Jiao Li4, Congcong Wang4, Huanting Li5, Renshuai Zhang1, Dongming Xing1,6.
Abstract
Elevated cholesterol significantly increases the risk of developing atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease. The key to treating hypercholesterolemia is lowering plasma cholesterol levels. There have been no studies on the cholesterol-lowering potential of parthenolide (PTL), a naturally occurring small molecule from Tanacetum parthenium. Here, we first put forth PTL's cholesterol-lowering ability to inhibit cellular uptake of cholesterol in a dose-dependent manner. Its performance was on par with the positive control drug, ezetimibe. Niemann-Pick C1 Like-1 (NPC1L1) has been identified as a potential therapeutic target for hypercholesterolemia. The interaction of PTL with NPC1L1 could be explained by the results of molecular docking and filipin staining further reinforces this hypothesis. Furthermore, PTL reduced the expression of NPC1L1 in HepG2 cells in a concentration-dependent manner, which suggests that PTL functions as a potential NPC1L1 inhibitor with therapeutic potential for hypercholesterolemia.Entities:
Keywords: NPC1L1; PTL; cholesterol-lowering ability; drug screening; hypercholesterolemia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36234807 PMCID: PMC9572688 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27196270
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
IC50 value of PTL for inhibition of cholesterol uptake.
| Inhibitors | PTL | Ezetimibe |
|---|---|---|
| IC50 (μM) | 53.29 ± 1.39 | 51.49 ± 0.6652 |
Figure 1(A) Inhibitory effect of PTL on cholesterol absorption in Caco-2 cells. Caco-2 cells were pretreated with PTL at different concentrations for 4 h and then incubated with NBD-cholesterol for 1 h. (B) Inhibitory effect of ezetimibe on cholesterol absorption in HepG2 cells. HepG2 cells were pretreated with ezetimibe at different concentrations for 4 h and then incubated with NBD-cholesterol for 1 h. (C) Inhibitory effect of PTL on cholesterol absorption in HepG2 cells. HepG2 cells were pretreated with PTL at different concentrations for 4 h and then incubated with NBD-cholesterol for 1 h. Values are expressed as mean ± SD of three to five experiments. (#: control, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, compared to control).
Figure 2Binding modes of the PTL to NPC1L1. (A) The cholesterol-binding cavity (red) in the N-terminal domain. (B) Binding modes of the PTL to NPC1L1 (PDB: 6V3F). The PTL is shown in color by element (carbon in cyan). The H-bonds are displayed using yellow dashed lines. The key amino acid residues are shown in color by element (carbon in yellow). (C) Interaction assay of inhibitors with NPC1L1 by SPR. Data are presented as relative maximum binding in 50 μM. The binding of ezetimibe to NPC1L1 was normalized as 1.0.
Figure 3Expression of NPC1L1 in Mcf-7, Hela, SW1990, U2OS, HepG2, and Caco-2 cells. (A) Western blot analysis of cells after standard culture in medium A with 10% FBS. (B) A statistical representation of Western blot results.
Figure 4PTL inhibits cholesterol uptake. (A) Diagram showing the procedure used to treat the HepG2 and U2OS cells. Briefly, the cells were depleted of cholesterol by incubation in the cholesterol−depleting medium for 60 min. The cells were then incubated for 60 min in the cholesterol−depleted medium containing the indicated drugs. After 60 min, the cells were incubated for 60 min with the cholesterol−supplemented medium containing the indicated drugs. The PTL concentration was 50 μM and the ezetimibe concentration was 30 μM. Cells were subjected to staining at various time points. (B) Quantification of intracellular cholesterol of the HepG2 cells in (D). Error bars represent standard deviations. (C) Quantification of intracellular cholesterol of the U2OS cells in (D). Error bars represent standard deviations. (D) HepG2 and U2OS cells were treated as shown in (A). Cholesterol was labeled with filipin stain and examined using a high−resolution, high−speed scanning confocal microscope. Scale bar = 20 μm. (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 compared to control).
Figure 5(A) Competitive inhibition mechanism of PTL. (B) Lineweaver−Burk plot in the presence of PTL at different concentrations.
Figure 6Effects of PTL on NPC1L1 protein expression in HepG2 cells. (A) Cells were treated with 1, 10, 50 μM of PTL and 10, 30 μM of ezetimibe for 24 h, followed by Western blot analysis of NPC1L1 in HepG2 cells. (B) A statistical representation of the Western blot showed that the expression of NPC1L1 was altered after PTL and ezetimibe treatments compared to controls. (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 compared to control).
Figure 7(A) Chemical structure of PTL. (B) Inhibition of Caco-2 cells’ and HepG2 cells’ viability by PTL at 100, 50, 1 μM. The experiments were performed in triplicate and are expressed as mean ± SD.