Literature DB >> 36234796

A Water-Soluble Leggero Pillar[5]arene.

Jia-Rui Wu1, Gengxin Wu1, Zhi Cai1, Dongxia Li1, Meng-Hao Li1, Yan Wang1, Ying-Wei Yang1.   

Abstract

The study of aqueous-phase molecular recognition of artificial receptors is one of the frontiers in supramolecular chemistry since most biochemical processes and reactions take place in an aqueous medium and heavily rely on it. In this work, a water-soluble version of leggero pillar[5]arene bearing eight positively charged pyridinium moieties (CWP[5]L) was designed and synthesized, which exhibited good binding affinities with certain aliphatic sulfonate species in aqueous solutions. Significantly, control experiments demonstrate that the guest binding performance of CWP[5]L is superior to its counterpart water-soluble macrocyclic receptor in traditional pillararenes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  host–guest systems; leggero pillar[5]arene; molecular recognition; pillararene

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36234796      PMCID: PMC9571795          DOI: 10.3390/molecules27196259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Molecules        ISSN: 1420-3049            Impact factor:   4.927


1. Introduction

Synthetic macrocycles have been serving as the primary tools in host-guest chemistry since their birth owing to their intrinsic functional characteristics and capabilities of molecular recognition and self-assembly [1,2,3]. Modern supramolecular chemistry has also significantly benefited from the development of novel macrocyclic receptors with preorganized cavity structures and intriguing host–guest properties [4]. For example, pillar[n]arenes (pillararenes), a family of influential synthetic macrocycles first introduced by Ogoshi et al. in 2008 [5,6], have experienced rapid development during the past years and created a boom in many cross-disciplinary research fields, including but not limited to molecular devices and machines [7], stimuli-responsive supramolecular/host–guest systems [8,9,10,11,12,13,14], porous/nonporous materials [15,16,17], organic–inorganic hybrid systems [18,19,20,21], catalysis [22,23,24] and cancer theranostics [25,26,27]. Inspired by pillararenes, many novel macrocyclic entities such as asar[n]arenes [28], hybrid[n]arenes [29], biphenyl-extended pillar[6]arene [30,31,32,33], tiara[5]arene [34], bowtiearene [35], leaning pillar[6]arene [36,37], geminiarenes [38,39], pagoda[4]arene [4]arene and . J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2020 ">40] and biphenarenes [41] have been designed and synthesized in rapid succession, promoting the prosperity of modern synthetic macrocyclic chemistry and creating unlimited possibilities for supramolecular chemistry and materials. Very recently, we presented a new version of pillararene-derived macrocyclic arenes named leggero pillar[n]arenes [42,43], in which two substituents on a single one of the units of traditional pillararenes were selectively removed to expand their structural flexibility and cavity adaptability. Since most biochemical reactions take place in water, the investigation of molecular recognition in aqueous phases is of greater research value than in organic phases. In the past few years, cationic water-soluble macrocyclic receptors have received tremendous attention in supramolecular community due to their great potential in complexing with important organic anionic species, and many valuable applications such as antibiotics [44], metabolism regulation [45], selective precipitation [33], self-assembly [46] and supra-amphiphiles [47] have been explored on the basis of this feature. Thus, synthesis of novel cationic water-soluble macrocyclic receptors and investigating their host–guest properties in aqueous phase are highly significant and worth exploring. In this work, the first cationic water-soluble version of the leggero pillar[5]arene (i.e., CWP[5]L) is designed and successfully synthesized. Four aliphatic sulfonate guests with different chain lengths (G1–G4) are selected to investigate the recognition properties of CWP[5]L in aqueous media (Scheme 1). Control experiments employing its counterpart macrocyclic derivative CWP[5]A from traditional pillararenes confirm that CWP[5]L has better binding performance owing to its superior structural flexibility.
Scheme 1

Synthesis of (a) CWP[5]L and (b) CWP[5]A. (c) Chemical structures of selected aliphatic sulfonate guests G1–G4 investigated in this study.

2. Results

As shown in Scheme 1, CWP[5]L and CWP[5]A bearing eight and ten cationic pyridinium moieties could be quantitatively prepared through a SN2 nucleophilic substitution by reacting their corresponding perbromoethylated macrocyclic derivatives BrP[5]L and BrP[5]A with pyridine (also as solvent), respectively, and the target receptors were fully characterized by 1H/13C NMR and high-resolution mass spectroscopy (HRMS) (Figures S1–S6). The binding behaviors of CWP[5]L with G1–G4 were first investigated by 1H NMR spectroscopy. As shown in Figure 1a, when we mixed CWP[5]L (4.0 mM) and 1.0 equiv. of G1 in D2O, the 1H NMR spectrum displayed only one set of resonance signals distinct from those of the single component host and guest, indicating that the binding complex was formed, and the complexation between CWP[5]L and G1 was a fast exchange process on the NMR timescale. Compared with the free guest, protons Ha-Hc of G1 showed remarkable upfield shifts and broadening effects as a result of the inclusion-induced shielding effects, while protons Hd on the terminal methyl showed downfield shifts due to the deshielding effect. These changes indicated that G1 was threaded into the host cavity, forming an interpenetrated inclusion complex. On the other hand, the host was deshielded by the included guest, and the proton signals of CWP[5]L derived from the pyridinium moieties (H1) and substituted phenylene subunits (H2 and H3) exhibited downfield displacement.
Figure 1

(a) 1H NMR spectra (400 MHz, D2O, 298 K) of G1, G1 + CWP[5]L and CWP[5]L. Concentrations of host and guest are all 4.0 mM; (b) 2D ROE analysis of CWP[5]L with G1 in D2O with a mixing time of 300 ms (600 MHz, 298 K; the concentrations of CWP[5]L and G1 are 4 mM and 5 mM, respectively).

The host-guest binding behavior between CWP[5]L and G1 was also investigated by 2D ROESY analysis. As shown in Figure 1b, the correlation signals between the alkyl chain protons (Hc) of G1 and the phenylene and pyridinium protons (H1 and H2) of CWP[5]L were clearly observed, further confirming the interpenetrated geometry. Besides, similar complexation-induced shielding/deshielding effects were also observed in the mixtures of CWP[5]L and other selected sulfonate guests (G2–G4), respectively, indicating that these host-guest assemblies have a similar binding mode, i.e., the macrocyclic cavity of CWP[5]L is threaded by the alkyl chain of the guests. Interestingly, it should be noted that with the decrease in the alkyl chain length from G1 to G4, the resonance signals for the terminal methyl protons (Hd) experienced a shift from downfield (G1 and G2) to upfield (G3 and G4) upon mixing with CWP[5]L (Figure 1a and Figures S7–S9), suggesting that the terminal groups of G1 and G2 are protruded out of the macrocyclic cavity and the corresponding inclusion complexes could also be considered as [2]pseudorotaxane structures, respectively (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Cartoon representation of the 1:1 inclusion complexation between CWP[5]L and guests G1–G4 (from left to right), and the [2]pseudorotaxane structures of the complexes of G1⊂CWP[5]L and G2⊂CWP[5]L.

To quantitatively estimate the interactions between CWP[5]L and the sulfonate guests, 1H NMR titration experiments were further implemented to afford the association constants (Ka) for the host-guest inclusion complexation in D2O (Figures S10–S13). As shown in Figure 3a–d, CWP[5]L has good binding affinities towards all the guests, and the Ka values for 1:1 complexation with G1–G4 were determined to be 50,500, 34,300, 11,600 and 9330 M−1, respectively. Interestingly, a marked increase in the Ka values was observed in the order of G4 < G3 < G2 < G1, which could be attributed to the enhanced hydrophobic interaction and the guests’ increasing chain length.
Figure 3

Non-linear curve-fitting (NMR titrations) for the complexation between (a) CWP[5]L and G1, (b) CWP[5]L and G2, (c) CWP[5]L and G3, (d) CWP[5]L and G4, (e) CWP[5]A and G1, (f) CWP[5]A and G2, (g) CWP[5]A and G, and (h) CWP[5]A and G4 in D2O at 298 K. All the titration experiments were repeated thrice with the relative errors less than 15%.

Given that CWP[5]L exhibited strong binding affinities with linear sulfonate guests, we were curious to find some differences in the binding performance between CWP[5]L and its counterpart water-soluble macrocyclic derivative CWP[5]A from traditional pillararenes. Subsequently, controlled 1H NMR titration experiments by using CWP[5]A were carried out (Figures S14–S17), and the Ka values for G1–G4 were determined to be 39,500, 9760, 6210 and 5900 M−1, respectively (Figure 3e–h). Analogously, the Ka values increase in the order of G4 < G3 < G2 < G1, again confirming the pivotal role of hydrophobic interaction in modulating the host-guest inclusion complexation in the aqueous phase. Significantly, the binding constants of CWP[5]L are larger than those of its counterpart CWP[5]A, indicating that the de-functionalized and free-rotation phenylene units invest CWP[5]L with more superior cavity adaptability and relatively low in-cavity electron density for binding anionic species.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Information

Starting reagents and solvents were commercially available and used without further purification unless stated otherwise. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE III 400 MHz instrument at room temperature. The 2D ROESY NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE III 600 MHz instrument. Mass spectra were recorded on a Bruker Agilent1290-micrOTOF Q II High-resolution (HR) mass spectrometry instrument.

3.2. Synthetic Procedures

Perbromoethylated macrocyclic derivatives BrP[5]L and BrP[5]A were synthesized according to the previous literature reports [21,43].

3.2.1. Synthesis of CWP[5]L

A pyridine (3 mL) solution of BrP[5]L (0.6 g, 0.4 mmol) was heated at 100 °C for 10 h. Then, the resulting precipitate was filtered and washed with CH2Cl2 to afford the target compound as a light yellow solid (0.82 g, 95%). 1H NMR (600 MHz, 298 K, D2O, δ ppm): δ 8.88 (dd, J = 5.2, 3.5 Hz, 8H), 8.63–8.52 (m, 6H), 8.47–8.35 (m, 6H), 8.17 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 8.01 (dt, J = 40.1, 7.2 Hz, 10H), 7.71 (dt, J = 95.8, 7.2 Hz, 8H), 6.77–6.61 (m, 10H), 6.06 (s, 2H), 5.05–4.87 (m, 13H), 4.57–4.52 (m, 4H), 4.50–4.44 (m, 8H), 4.42–4.37 (m, 4H), 3.91 (s, 3H), 3.59 (d, J = 22.0 Hz, 6H), 3.44 (s, 4H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, 298 K, D2O, δ ppm): δ 149.40, 146.35, 146.16, 145.74, 144.81, 144.68, 144.46, 128.30, 128.23, 128.12, 127.70, 116.25, 115.36, 67.44, 66.80, 61.00, 60.90, 34.52, 28.88; HRMS (ESI): [C91H93N8O8Br5]3+ calcd. [M] m/z: 607.1032, found m/z: 607.1082.

3.2.2. Synthesis of CWP[5]A

A pyridine (3 mL) solution of BrP[5]A (0.6 g, 0.35 mmol) was heated at 100 °C for 10 h. Then, the resulting precipitate was filtered and washed with CH2Cl2 to afford the target compound as a light yellow solid (0.84 g, 96%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, 298 K, D2O, δ ppm): δ 8.69 (d, J = 5.8 Hz, 20H), 8.26 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 10H), 7.84 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 20H), 6.48 (s, 10H), 4.88 (s, 20H), 4.42 (s, 20H), 3.37 (s, 10H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, 298 K, D2O, δ ppm): δ 149.08, 146.08, 144.64, 128.94, 128.05, 115.77, 67.14, 60.82, 29.26; HRMS (ESI): [C105H110N10O10Br6]4+ calcd. [M] m/z: 537.8703, found m/z: 537.8414.

3.3. Determination of Association Constants

To determine the association constant, 1H NMR titrations using a nonlinear least-squares curve-fitting method were performed at 298 K in D2O. The association constants (Ka) were obtained for each host-guest combination from the following equation [48]:Δδ = (Δδ where [H]0 is the varying concentrations of host, Δδ is the chemical shift change of specific proton (Ha) on the guest at [H]0, Δδ∞ is the chemical shift change of Ha when the guest is completely complexed, [G]0 is the fixed initial concentration of the guest. Assuming 1: 1 binding mode between the macrocyclic hosts (CWP[5]L and CWP[5]A) and sulfonate guests G1–G4, the plot of Δδ as a function of [H]0 for each investigated host-guest pair gave a good fit, confirming the validity of the 1:1 complexation stoichiometry assumed.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we successfully synthesized the first water-soluble derivative of leggero pillar[5]arene (i.e., CWP[5]L), where the presence of eight cationic pyridinium moieties makes it a highly effective receptor for anionic sulfonate species in aqueous solutions. NMR experiments demonstrated that all the guests could be encapsulated into the cavity of CWP[5]L to form 1:1 host-guest complexes with interpenetrated geometry, and the binding affinities could be remarkably enhanced by increasing the alkyl chain length of the guests due to the growing hydrophobic interaction. More importantly, controlled experiments employing its counterpart water-soluble macrocyclic receptor derived from traditional pillararenes confirmed that CWP[5]L had better binding performance because of its superior structural flexibility and cavity adaptability originating from the free-rotation phenylene subunit. Above all, given the superior binding performance toward anionic species in water, we firmly believe that CWP[5]L will find far-ranging applications in, for example, molecular recognition, environmental remediation, biomedicine, material science and other related fields.
  38 in total

1.  Conjugated Macrocycle Polymer Nanoparticles with Alternating Pillarenes and Porphyrins as Struts and Cyclic Nodes.

Authors:  Zheng Li; Xi Li; Ying-Wei Yang
Journal:  Small       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 13.281

2.  Macrocyclic Arenes-Based Conjugated Macrocycle Polymers for Highly Selective CO2 Capture and Iodine Adsorption.

Authors:  Dihua Dai; Jie Yang; Yong-Cun Zou; Jia-Rui Wu; Li-Li Tan; Yan Wang; Bao Li; Tong Lu; Bo Wang; Ying-Wei Yang
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Pillararene-enriched linear conjugated polymer materials with thiazolo[5,4-d]thiazole linkages for photocatalysis.

Authors:  Zheng Li; Lu Li; Yan Wang; Ying-Wei Yang
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 4.  Noncovalently bound and mechanically interlocked systems using pillar[n]arenes.

Authors:  Kenichi Kato; Shixin Fa; Shunsuke Ohtani; Tan-Hao Shi; Albert M Brouwer; Tomoki Ogoshi
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 54.564

5.  Biphen[n]arenes: Modular Synthesis, Customizable Cavity Sizes, and Diverse Skeletons.

Authors:  Zhi-Yuan Zhang; Chunju Li
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 22.384

6.  para-Bridged symmetrical pillar[5]arenes: their Lewis acid catalyzed synthesis and host-guest property.

Authors:  Tomoki Ogoshi; Suguru Kanai; Shuhei Fujinami; Tada-aki Yamagishi; Yoshiaki Nakamoto
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Cationic Pillararenes Potently Inhibit Biofilm Formation without Affecting Bacterial Growth and Viability.

Authors:  Roymon Joseph; Alissa Naugolny; Mark Feldman; Ido M Herzog; Micha Fridman; Yoram Cohen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 8.  Pillar-Shaped Macrocyclic Hosts Pillar[n]arenes: New Key Players for Supramolecular Chemistry.

Authors:  Tomoki Ogoshi; Tada-Aki Yamagishi; Yoshiaki Nakamoto
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 60.622

9.  A Stretchable Pillararene-Containing Supramolecular Polymeric Material with Self-Healing Property.

Authors:  Meng Zhao; Changjun Li; Xiaotao Shan; Huijing Han; Qiuhua Zhao; Meiran Xie; Jianzhuang Chen; Xiaojuan Liao
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 10.  Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Systems in Supramolecular Macrocyclic Chemistry.

Authors:  Xin-Yue Lou; Nan Song; Ying-Wei Yang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.