| Literature DB >> 36234651 |
Vladimir A Shipelin1,2, Antonina A Shumakova1, Eleonora N Trushina3, Oksana K Mustafina3, Alexander G Masyutin4, Alexey I Kolobanov1, Ilya E Sokolov1, Ivan V Gmoshinski1, Sergey A Khotimchenko1,5, Dmitry B Nikityuk6,7.
Abstract
Nickel (Ni) nanoparticles (NPs) are used as technological aids-catalysts in the oil and fat industry, in pharmaceuticals, and in the production of cosmetics and pesticides. The acute and subchronic oral toxicity of metallic Ni in the nanoform is not well understood. The study aimed to investigate the acute and subchronic oral toxicity of Ni NPs to rats. We used two NP preparations (Ni NP1 and Ni NP2) with spherical particles and an average diameter of 53.7 and 70.9 nm according to the electron microscopy data. In the study of acute toxicity, both kinds of Ni NPs were administered to male and female Wistar rats aged 8 weeks as a single dose of 2000 mg/kg b.w. through a gastric gavage. In the subchronic experiment, male Wistar rats initially aged 7 weeks received for 92 days Ni NP1 and Ni NP2 as well as the "traditional" soluble salt form of Ni (Ni basic carbonate) at doses of 0.1, 1, and 10 mg/kg body weight (mg/kg b.w.) in terms of Ni content as a part of the diet consumed. As a result, in an acute study, the oral LD50 for Ni NP2 in male and female rats was about 1600 mg/kg b.w. (IV hazard class). The oral dose of Ni NP1 equal to 2000 mg/kg b.w. exceeded LD100 for males and corresponded to LD90 for females. In the subchronic study, the bioaccumulation of both Ni NPs as well as Ni salt was observed in the kidney but not in the liver and spleen. Ni NP1 decreased body weight only at a dose of 1 mg/kg b.w.; affected the relative weight of the spleen at 0.1 mg/kg, the brain at 1.0 mg/kg, and the thymus at 10 mg/kg; and decreased locomotor activity at 0.1 and 10 mg/kg. Thus, for Ni NP1, in such cases where a monotonic dose-response relationship could be traced, LOEL could be stated at 10 mg/kg b.w./day for 92 days of oral intake. However, for some endpoints where such a monotonic relationship could be absent, significant toxic effects were observed even at a dose 0.1 mg/kg. In the case of Ni NP2, changes in the relative weight of the liver, thymus, and brain were recorded starting from 0.1 mg/kg b.w.; locomotor activity decreased starting from 0.1 mg/kg. Other effects, including basophiles count and platelet system indexes, were observed at a dose of 1 mg/kg or higher. Thus, the LOEL value for Ni NP2 can be fixed at 0.1 mg/kg. The critical organs affected by both Ni NPs were the brain and immune system. Most of the toxic effects exhibited by metallic Ni NPs were absent or had an opposite orientation upon administration of equivalent doses of Ni in the salt form which indicates the signs of "nanotoxicity" in metallic Ni NPs. In conclusion, the data obtained show that there may be some additional health risks caused by the intake of Ni in a nanoform compared to soluble ionized forms of this element at equivalent doses.Entities:
Keywords: acute toxicity; apoptosis; behavioral responses; nanoparticles; neurotoxicity; nickel; oral toxicity; rats
Year: 2022 PMID: 36234651 PMCID: PMC9565661 DOI: 10.3390/nano12193523
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1Schematic representation of the experimental design of subchronic toxicity study.
Dimensional characteristics of Ni NP1 and Ni NP2 according to TEM data.
| Dimensions, nm | Nanomaterials | |
|---|---|---|
| Ni NP1 | Ni NP2 | |
| Mean diameter (M) | 53.7 | 70.9 |
| Standard error of the mean (S.E.M.) | 2.9 | 3.3 |
| Standard deviation (S.D.) | 29.3 | 32.0 |
| Median (Med) | 47.0 | 64.0 |
| The smallest diameter | 15.0 | 17.0 |
| The largest diameter | 180.0 | 192.0 |
| The number of particles within dimensional range: | ||
| Less than 50 nm | 55.5 | 24.0 |
| 50–100 nm | 37.8 | 57.1 |
| More than 100 nm | 6.7 | 18.9 |
| Normality distribution test | 0.034 | >0.1 |
| ζ-potential, mV | +25.71 | −3.33 |
Figure 2Characterization of metallic Ni NPs of two sizes by TEM. (a,c)—Ni NP1; (b,d)—Ni NP2. Representative micrographs (a,b) and histograms of particle diameter distribution (c,d).
Figure 3The survival rate of male and female rats within 14 days after a single intragastric administration of Ni NPs at a dose of 2000 mg/kg b.w.
Figure 4Estimated actual doses of Ni NPs preparations consumed by rats during the 92-day experiment: (a) Soluble salt of Ni (Ni S); (b) Ni NP1; (c) Ni NP2.
Figure 5Average body weight of rats (g; M ± S.E.M.) during the experiment. *—the difference with the control group is significant; #—the difference with the group that received the Ni soluble salt (Ni S) in an equivalent dose is significant; p < 0.05. The number of animals is 12 in each group.
Mean (M ± S.E.M.) body weight and relative organ weight (% body weight) of rats at withdrawal from the experiment.
| Group | Body Weight, g | Relative Organ Weight (% of Body Weight) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liver | Spleen | Thymus | Brain | ||
| 1. Control | 413 ± 9 | 3.09 ± 0.06 | 0.28 ± 0.03 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.46 ± 0.01 |
| 2. Ni S 0.1 mg/kg b.w. | 415 ± 20 | 2.86 ± 0.11 * | 0.31 ± 0.03 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.50 ± 0.02 |
| 3. Ni S 1.0 mg/kg b.w. | 431 ± 14 | 2.92 ± 0.13 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.48 ± 0.02 |
| 4. Ni S 10 mg/kg b.w. | 407 ± 20 | 2.94 ± 0.07 | 0.21 ± 0.018 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.51 ± 0.02 |
| 5. Ni NP1 0.1 mg/kg b.w. | 384 ± 18 | 2.89 ± 0.08 | 0.21 ± 0.01 *# | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.52 ± 0.03 |
| 6. Ni NP1 1.0 mg/kg b.w. | 371 ± 14 *# | 2.91 ± 0.07 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.53 ± 0.02 * |
| 7. Ni NP1 10 mg/kg b.w. | 407 ± 13 | 2.90 ± 0.09 | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 0.11 ± 0.01 *# | 0.49 ± 0.01 |
| 8. Ni NP2 0.1 mg/kg b.w. | 395 ± 7 | 2.80 ± 0.07* | 0.22 ± 0.02 # | 0.10 ± 0.01 *# | 0.51 ± 0.01 * |
| 9. Ni NP2 1.0 mg/kg b.w. | 401 ± 10 | 2.82 ± 0.05* | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.01 * | 0.50 ± 0.01 * |
| 10. Ni NP2 10 mg/kg b.w. | 393 ± 14 | 2.80 ± 0.05* | 0.21 ± 0.02 Ø | 0.11 ± 0.01 * | 0.50 ± 0.01 * |
| Factors | - | Ni × nano | - | - | - |
Notes: *—the difference with the control group is significant; #—the difference with the group receiving soluble salt of Ni (Ni S) in an equivalent dose, is significant; Ø—the difference with the group receiving Ni NP1 is significant; p < 0.05. Factors: distribution is not uniform, p < 0.05, 3-way ANOVA, by factors of Ni dose (Ni), presence of nanoform (nano). Data for kidney, adrenals, and testis are not presented (no significant differences noticed). The number of animals is 12 in each group.
Figure 6Parameters of rats in the CRPA test: (a) latency of entry into the dark chamber, seconds (Med, interval of change); (b) the number of animals retaining short-term and long-term memory, %. #—the difference with the group that received the Ni salt in an equivalent dose is significant; p < 0.05. The number of animals is 12 in each group.
Figure 7Indicators (M ± S.E.M) of locomotor activity (a–c) and anxiety (d) of rats in the EPM test during the experiment: (a) maximum speed in OA, cm/s; (b) maximum speed in CA, cm/s; (c) maximum speed in general, cm/s; (d) the ratio of the residence times in the CA and OA, dimensionless. *—the difference with group 1 (control) is significant; #—the difference with the group receiving the salt form of Ni (Ni S) in an equivalent dose, is significant, Mann–Whitney U-test. Horizontal bracket–non-uniform distribution by factors of the presence of nanoform (nano), p < 0.05, ANOVA test. The number of animals is 12 in each group.
Hematological indicators (leucocytes and thrombocyte counts) in rats.
| Group | Indicators (M ± S.E.M), Measurement Units | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leucocytes Total, | Neutro- | Basophiles, 107 × L−1 | Lympho- | Monocytes, 109 × L−1 | Trombo- | Mean Volume of Trombocyte, μm3 | Trombocrit, % | |
| 1. Control | 10.4 ± 1.0 | 1.73 ± 0.18 | 5.66 ± 0.78 | 6.92 ± 0.51 | 1.49 ± 0.38 | 634 ± 22 | 6.57 ± 0.15 | 0.42 ± 0.02 |
| 2. Ni S 0.1 mg/kg b.w. | 7.5 ± 1.0 | 1.70 ± 0.39 | 4.65 ± 1.28 | 4.69 ± 0.66 * | 0.87 ± 0.25 | 618 ± 41 | 6.84 ± 0.17 | 0.42 ± 0.03 |
| 3. Ni S 1.0 mg/kg b.w. | 8.7 ± 1.5 | 1.84 ± 0.26 | 7.01 ± 1.99 | 5.46 ± 1.11 | 0.97 ± 0.22 | 622 ± 44 | 6.80 ± 0.24 | 0.42 ± 0.02 |
| 4. Ni S 10 mg/kg b.w. | 7.8 ± 1.2 | 1.40 ± 0.36 | 4.35 ± 1.22 | 5.53 ± 0.90 | 0.95 ± 0.17 | 632 ± 39 | 6.54 ± 0.07 | 0.41 ± 0.02 |
| 5. Ni NP1 0.1 mg/kg b.w. | 9.4 ± 1.5 | 1.72 ± 0.31 | 5.96 ± 1.74 | 7.06 ± 1.16 | 0.74 ± 0.11 | 648 ± 34 | 6.31 ± 0.11 # | 0.41 ± 0.02 |
| 6. Ni NP1 1.0 mg/kg b.w. | 11.5 ± 1.3 | 2.85 ± 0.72 | 7.40 ± 1.42 | 7.72 ± 0.91 | 1.03 ± 0.13 | 515 ± 41 | 6.73 ± 0.16 | 0.34 ± 0.02 *# |
| 7. Ni NP1 10 mg/kg b.w. | 13.4 ± 1.6 # | 1.87 ± 0.16 | 7.48 ± 0.98 | 9.15 ± 1.09 # | 1.57 ± 0.12 # | 591 ± 41 # | 6.56 ± 0.12 | 0.39 ± 0.02 |
| 8. Ni NP2 0.1 mg/kg b.w. | 12.0 ± 1.4 # | 2.42 ± 0.28 | 5.44 ± 0.89 | 6.98 ± 0.84 # | 1.27 ± 0.12 ∅ | 555 ± 30 ∅ | 6.54 ± 0.11 | 0.36 ± 0.02 |
| 9. Ni NP2 1.0 mg/kg b.w. | 10.5 ± 0.7 | 1.95 ± 0.21 | 9.68 ± 0.90 * | 7.14 ± 0.57 | 1.33 ± 0.17 | 544 ± 40 | 6.89 ± 0.32 | 0.37 ± 0.01 |
| 10. Ni NP2 10 mg/kg b.w. | 11.5 ± 1.2 | 2.72 ± 0.41 # | 5.81 ± 0.97 | 7.47 ± 0.92 | 1.10 ± 0.14 ∅ | 578 ± 47 ∅ | 6.09 ± 0.09 *#∅ | 0.35 ± 0.03 |
| Factors | nano | nano | Ni | - | Ni | nano | ||
Notes: *—the difference with the control group is significant; #—the difference with the group receiving soluble salt of Ni (Ni S) in equivalent dose, is significant; Ø—the difference with the group receiving Ni NP1 is significant; p < 0.05. Factors: distribution is not uniform, p < 0.05, 3-way ANOVA, by factors of Ni dose (Ni), presence of nanoform (nano). Data for kidney, adrenals, and testis are not presented (no significant differences noticed). The number of animals is 8 in each group.
Mean (M ± S.E.M.) Ni content in the organs of rats at withdrawal from the experiment.
| Group | Content, μg/g (Wet Weight) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Liver | Kidney | Spleen | |
| 1. Control | 1.12 ± 0.15 | 0.50 ± 0.04 | 0.39 ± 0.12 |
| 2. Ni S 0.1 mg/kg b.w. | 1.35 ± 0.03 | 0.71 ± 0.25 | 0.20 ± 0.03 |
| 3. Ni S 1.0 mg/kg b.w. | 1.65 ± 0.32 | 1.57 ± 0.28 * | 0.18 ± 0.01 |
| 4. Ni S 10 mg/kg b.w. | 0.76 ±0.06 * | 3.94 ± 0.79 * | 0.36 ± 0.04 |
| 5. Ni NP1 0.1 mg/kg b.w. | 0.61 ± 0.05 *# | 0.70 ± 0.21 | 0.24 ± 0.05 |
| 6. Ni NP1 1.0 mg/kg b.w. | 0.61 ± 0.02 *# | 0.65 ± 0.11 # | 0.15 ± 0.01 |
| 7. Ni NP1 10 mg/kg b.w. | 0.66 ± 0.03 * | 2.92 ± 0.46 * | 0.33 ± 0.05 |
| 8. Ni NP2 0.1 mg/kg b.w. | 0.62 ± 0.01 * | 0.38 ± 0.04 * | 0.16 ± 0.01 |
| 9. Ni NP2 1.0 mg/kg b.w. | 0.58 ± 0.02 *# | 0.68 ± 0.22 # | 0.16 ± 0.02 |
| 10. Ni NP2 10 mg/kg b.w. | 0.58 ± 0.02 *#Ø | 2.36 ± 0.55 * | 0.22 ± 0.02 # |
| Factors | Ni, nano, Ni×nano | Ni, nano | Ni |
Notes: *—the difference with the control group is significant; #—the difference with the group receiving soluble salt of Ni (Ni S) in equivalent dose, is significant; Ø—the difference with the group receiving Ni NP1 is significant; p < 0.05. Factors: distribution is not uniform, p < 0.05, 3-way ANOVA, by factors of Ni dose (Ni), presence of nanoform (nano), and combination thereof. The number of animals is 8 in each group.