| Literature DB >> 36234541 |
Muhammad Shahid1, Hafiz Muhammad Asif Javed1, Muhammad Irfan Ahmad1, Akbar Ali Qureshi2, Muhammad Ijaz Khan3,4, Maha Abdallah Alnuwaiser5, Arslan Ahmed6, Muhammad Azhar Khan7, El Sayed Mohamed Tag-ElDin8, Arslan Shahid1, Aiman Rafique1.
Abstract
In recent years, the synthesis of ammonia (NH3) has been developed by electrocatalytic technology that is a potential way to effectively replace the Haber-Bosch process, which is an industrial synthesis of NH3. Industrial ammonia has caused a series of problems for the population and environment. In the face of sustainable green synthesis methods, the advantages of electrocatalytic nitrogen reduction for synthesis of NH3 in aqueous media have attracted a great amount of attention from researchers. This review summarizes the recent progress on the highly efficient electrocatalysts based on 2D non-metallic nanomaterial and provides a brief overview of the synthesis principle of electrocatalysis and the performance measurement indicators of electrocatalysts. Moreover, the current development of N2 reduction reaction (NRR) electrocatalyst is discussed and prospected.Entities:
Keywords: electrocatalytic conversion; nitrogen fixation; nitrogen reduction; synthetic ammonia
Year: 2022 PMID: 36234541 PMCID: PMC9565502 DOI: 10.3390/nano12193413
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1Schematic Diagram of NRR system [25].
Application of electrocatalysts based on 2D non-metallic nanomaterials.
| Catalyst | Potential | Electrolyte | NH3 Production Rate | FE | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B-doped graphene | −0.50 V | 0.050 M H2SO4 | 9.80 µg/h cm2 | 10.80% | [ |
| O-doped graphene | −0.55 V | 0.10 M HCl | 21.30 µg/h mg | 12.60% (−0.45 V) | [ |
| S-doped graphene | −0.60 V | 0.10 M HCl | 27.30 µg/h mg | 11.50% (−0.50 V) | [ |
| S dots-rGO | −0.85 V | 0.50 M LiClO4 | 28.5 µg/h mg | 7.070% | [ |
| FeOOH QDs-GS | −0.40 V | 0.10 M LiClO4 | 27.30 µg/h mg | 14.6% | [ |
| CeO2-rGO | −0.70 V | 0.10 M Na2SO4 | 16.99 µg/h mg | 4.78% | [ |
| P-doped graphene | −0.65 V | 0.50 M LiClO4, | 32.3 µg/h mg | 20.82% | [ |
| MoO2/RGO | −0.35 V | 0.10 M Na2SO4 | 37.40 µg/h mg | 6.6% | [ |
| CuO/RGO | −0.75 V | 0.10 M Na2SO4 | 1.80 × 10 mol/s cm2 | 3.9% | [ |
| N–S co-doped graphene | −0.60 V | 0.10 M HCl | 7.70 µg/h mg | 5.8% | [ |
| Pd0.2Cu0.8/rGO | −0.20 V | 0.10 M KOH | 2.81 µg/h mg | - | [ |
| ZnO/RGO | −0.65 V | 0.10 M Na2SO4 | 17.70 µg/h mg | 6.4% | [ |
| Ag NPs-rGO | −0.70 V | 0.10 M Na2SO4 | 18.8 µg/h mg | 3.60% | [ |
| PTCA-rGO | −0.50 V | 0.10 M HCl | 24.70 µg/h mg | 6.9% | [ |
| Fe2O3-rGO | −0.50 V | 0.50 M LiClO4 | 22.1 µg/h mg | 5.89% | [ |
| Mn3O4-rGO | −0.85 V | 0.10 M Na2SO4 | 17.40 µg/h mg | 3.52% | [ |
| Cr2O3-rGO | −0.70 V | 0.10 M HCl | 33.30 µg/h mg | 7.33% | [ |
| TA-rGO | −0.75 V | 0.50 M LiClO4 | 17.020 µg/h mg | 4.83% | [ |
| DG-800 | −0.40 V | 0.01 M H2SO4 | 4.3 µg/h mg | 8.5% | [ |
| SnO2/rGO | −0.50 V | 0.10 M Na2SO4 | 25.60 µg/h mg | 7.10% | [ |
| CoS2/NS-G | −0.05 V | 0.05 MH2SO4 | 25 µg/h mg | 25.90% | [ |
| NiO/G | −0.70 V | 0.10 M Na2SO4 | 18.60 µg/h mg | 7.8% | [ |
| rGO/Fe@Fe3O4/CP | −0.30 V | 0.20 M NaHCO3 | 1.30 × 10−10 mol cm−2 s−1 | 6.25% | [ |
| BCN | −0.30 V | 0.10 M HCl | 7.7 µg/h mg | 13.80% | [ |
| B nanosheet | −0.80 V | 0.10 M Na2 SO4 | 13.2 µg/h mg | 4.04% | [ |
| β-boron | −0.14 V | 0.10 M HCl | 3.1 µg/h mg | 4.84% | [ |
| BNS | −0.80 V | 0.10 M Na2SO4 | 13.2 µg/h mg | 4.04% | [ |
| B4C nanosheet | −0.75 V | 0.10 M HCl | 26.5 µg/h mg | 15.9% | [ |
| B4C-BGQDs | −0.45 V | 0.10 M HCl | 28.60 µg/h mg | 16.7% | [ |
| O-CN | −0.60 V | 0.10 M HCl | 20.1 µg/h mg | 4.9% | [ |
| black P nanosheet | −0.70 V | 0.010 M HCl | 31.3 µg/h mg | 5.06% | [ |
| BN nanosheet | −0.75 V | 0.10 M HCl | 22.40 µg/h mg | 4.7% | [ |
| (1T-MoS2/g-C3N4) | −0.30 V | 0.10 M HCl | 29.9 µg/h mg | 20.48% | [ |
Figure 2Electrocatalytic NRR reaction mechanism [26].
Figure 3Free Energy representation for the nitrogen reduction reaction on the (A) Mo2-N-C and Mo-N-C (B) catalysts [61].
Figure 4(A) The adsorption sites with the distal pathways on Nb-doped GD, shown by Enzymatic free energy diagram for nitrogen electrochemical reduction, Alternating, and Distal pathways on Nb@GD; (B) the ammonia conversion by nitrogen [62]. * represents an adsorption site.
Figure 5Scanning electron microscopy images of (A) GS and (B) FeOOH Quantum Dots-GS. (C) TEM image of FeOOH QDs-GS. (D) SAED and HRTEM images. (E) EDX elemental mapping & SEM images of carbon, iron, and oxygen in FeOOH Quantum Dots-GS. (F) Fes and RNH3 for FeOOH Quantum dots-GS/CP under different yields at −0.4 V using different electrode. (G) Recycle test of FeOOH Quantum dots-GS/CP at −0.40 volt [31].
Figure 6CoSx/NS-G hybrids composite characterization. (A) TEM and HRTEM images of CoS2/NS-G. (B) CoS2-doped NS-G hybrid composite elemental mapping images. XPS spectrum of Co 2p (C) andS 2p (D) for the CoS/NS-G and CoS2/NS-G hybrid products. (E) NH3 yield rate and Faradaic efficiency of CoS2/NS-G at each given potential. (F) Comparison of NH3 yield rate at −0.2 V and particle size for CoS2/NS-G hybrids which was synthesized by different amounts of cobalt salt. [47].
Figure 7SEM, TEM, and HRTEM images of C-BN are shown in (A–C), respectively. (D) FEs and VNH3 and for C-BN/CP at given potential. (E) Recycle test of C-BN/CP at −0.5 Volt [76].