| Literature DB >> 36234472 |
Hechen Liu1, Liwei Wei1, Fengsheng Gao1, Li Tang2, Le Li1, Zhanglin Sun1, Yunpeng Liu1, Peng Dong1.
Abstract
Bird pest control has become a major task for the operation and maintenance of distribution network lines. Epoxy resin that cures quickly at room temperature can be used to coat locations where birds frequently build their nests. However, epoxy resin has enormous internal stress and is brittle, so it is essential to toughen it. In this paper, for a room temperature curing system composed of polyurethane-modified epoxy resin and a polythiol curing agent, three kinds of particles, i.e., Al2O3, SiO2, and Mg(OH)2, were used to modify a polyurethane modified epoxy resin. Orthogonal experiments were designed to study the effects of different fillers on the comprehensive properties of polyurethane-modified epoxy resins. The experimental results showed that there were not only independent effects of different kinds if particles on the resin, but also synergistic effects of multiple particles. Nanoparticles can reduce the defects introduced by microparticles to a certain extent and improve the mechanical and electrical properties of the resin. The overall performance of the resin was optimized when the amounts of SiO2, Al2O3, and Mg(OH)2 were 1.7%, 2.5%, and 7%, respectively. The tensile strength of the resin was increased by 70%, the elongation at a break by 67.53%, and the breakdown strength by 20.31% compared with before the addition of filler. The microscopic morphology and thermal properties of the resin before and after the addition of filler were also studied. Adding fillers caused more cracks to absorb part of the energy when the resin matrix was stressed and increased the rigidity of the resin matrix and the resin's glass transition temperature (Tg) by 13.48 °C. Still, the temperature corresponding to the maximum rate of weight loss (Tmax) remained unchanged.Entities:
Keywords: nano-Al2O3; nano-SiO2; orthogonal test method; polyurethane-modified epoxy resin
Year: 2022 PMID: 36234472 PMCID: PMC9565338 DOI: 10.3390/nano12193344
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1Exposed conductive points in a power grid.
Figure 2Dumbbell-shaped samples of PU-ER.
Orthogonal experimental factor levels.
| Level | Factor | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Al2O3/% | SiO2/% | Mg(OH)2/% | |
| 1 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 3 |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| 3 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 11 |
Specific experimental design schemes in the orthogonal experiment.
| Test Number | Project | Level | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al2O3/% | SiO2/% | Mg(OH)2/% | ||
| 1 | A1B1C1 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 3 |
| 2 | A1B2C2 | 1.5 | 1 | 7 |
| 3 | A1B3C3 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 11 |
| 4 | A2B1C2 | 2 | 0.3 | 7 |
| 5 | A2B2C3 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
| 6 | A2B3C1 | 2 | 1.7 | 3 |
| 7 | A3B1C3 | 2.5 | 0.3 | 11 |
| 8 | A3B2C1 | 2.5 | 1 | 3 |
| 9 | A3B3C2 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 7 |
Figure 3Mechanical and physical properties of different groups of PU-ER: (a) Tensile strength and elongation at break; (b) Water absorption.
Mean and extreme difference analysis of tensile strength for each factor (MPa).
| Project | Factor | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Al2O3 | SiO2 | Mg(OH)2 | |
| Mean of level 1 | 3.65 | 3.40 | 4.14 |
| Mean of level 2 | 5.08 | 3.94 | 4.11 |
| Mean of level 3 | 3.56 | 4.96 | 4.04 |
| Extreme difference | 1.52 | 1.56 | 0.10 |
Performance test results of PU-ER without filler.
| PU-ER without Filler | |
|---|---|
| Tensile strength (MPa) | 2.50 |
| Elongation at break (%) | 58.20 |
| Water absorption rate(%) | 0.17 |
| Breakdown strength (kV/mm) | 30.67 |
| Leakage current (µA) | 50.12 |
| Dielectric loss (%) | 25.44 |
Mean and extreme difference analysis of elongation at break for each factor (%).
| Project | Factor | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Al2O3 | SiO2 | Mg(OH)2 | |
| Mean of level 1 | 101.76 | 89.57 | 90.17 |
| Mean of level 2 | 84.66 | 105.33 | 105.86 |
| Mean of level 3 | 93.14 | 84.66 | 83.87 |
| Extreme difference | 17.10 | 20.67 | 21.99 |
Mean and extreme difference analysis of water absorption for each factor (%).
| Project | Factor | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Al2O3 | SiO2 | Mg(OH)2 | |
| Mean of level 1 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.22 |
| Mean of level 2 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.21 |
| Mean of level 3 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.21 |
| Extreme difference | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.01 |
Figure 4Electrical properties of different groups of PU-ER: (a) Breakdown strength; (b) Leakage current and dielectric loss factor.
Mean and extreme difference analysis of the breakdown voltage of each factor (kV/mm).
| Project | Factor | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Al2O3 | SiO2 | Mg(OH)2 | |
| Mean of level 1 | 33.5 | 34.47 | 34.67 |
| Mean of level 2 | 35.13 | 35.17 | 35.4 |
| Mean of level 3 | 36.6 | 35.6 | 35.17 |
| Extreme difference | 3.1 | 1.13 | 0.73 |
Mean and extreme difference analysis of leakage current of each factor (μA).
| Project | Factor | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Al2O3 | SiO2 | Mg(OH)2 | |
| Mean of level 1 | 44.913 | 44.675 | 44 |
| Mean of level 2 | 44.257 | 43.14 | 44.531 |
| Mean of level 3 | 44.995 | 46.35 | 45.63 |
| Extreme difference | 9.783 | 3.21 | 1.63 |
Mean and extreme difference analysis of dielectric loss of each factor (%).
| Project | Factor | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Al2O3 | SiO2 | Mg(OH)2 | |
| Mean of level 1 | 16.42 | 16.495 | 16.177 |
| Mean of level 2 | 17.3 | 15.79 | 19.14 |
| Mean of level 3 | 18.26 | 19.705 | 16.66 |
| Extreme difference | 1.84 | 3.915 | 2.963 |
Figure 5SEM diagram of tensile section of resin before and after adding filler: (a) Pure resin; (b) Resin after adding filler.
Figure 6Tensile cross-sectional EDS diagram after doping with filler: (a) Distribution diagram of different elements; (b) EDS spectra.
Figure 7Storage modulus-temperature spectrum and loss factor−temperature spectrum of different groups of PU-ER: (a) Storage modulus-temperature spectrum; (b) Loss factor−temperature spectrum.
Glass transition temperature of resin before and after adding filler.
| Project | Tg (°C) |
|---|---|
| Pure resin | 17.06 |
| A3B3C2 | 30.54 |
Figure 8TG and DTG curves of different groups of PU-ER: (a) TG; (b) DTG.
TGA parameters before and after adding filler/ °C.
| Project | T5% (°C) | T50% (°C) | Tmax (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pure resin | 156.40 | 373.04 | 359.41 |
| A3B3C2 | 170.44 | 363.38 | 358.20 |