| Literature DB >> 36234339 |
Shuo Liu1, Yuanbo Zhang1, Zijian Su1, Tao Jiang1.
Abstract
A novel composite binder (humic acid modified bentonite, HAMB) and two other binders (bentonite and Modified humic acid, MHA) were used to explore the effects of binders on the properties of magnetite green pellets in this study. The results of green pellet properties and drying tests show that the low doses of a humic substance-based binder can achieve the same effect as high doses of bentonite binder. A humic substance-based binder could be a promising organic binder to replace bentonite. Meanwhile, the influence mechanism of adding different binders on the strength of green pellet was discussed, and the relationship between moisture content in the pellet and the compression strength of three binders was determined. A TG-DSC analysis found that the novel composite binder (HAMB) was not a simple mix of humic acid and bentonite, in which a humic substance could change the structure of bentonite and reduce the thermal stability of bentonite, causing the HAMB composite binder to have a high decomposition temperature.Entities:
Keywords: a humic substance-based binder; drying process; green pellets; water content
Year: 2022 PMID: 36234339 PMCID: PMC9571648 DOI: 10.3390/ma15196999
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Main chemical composition of magnetite concentrate (wt.%).
| Total Fe | SiO2 | Al2O3 | CaO | MgO | P | K2O | Na2O | TiO2 | LOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 67.25 | 5.60 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.12 | −2.25 |
Particle size distribution and other properties of magnetite.
| Particle Size Distribution (%) | Balling Index | Specific Surface Area (cm2/g) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| +74 μm | −74~+38 μm | −38 μm | ||
| 0.18 | 6.47 | 93.35 | 0.38 | 1971 |
Main chemical compositions of bentonite (wt.%).
| Total Fe | SiO2 | Al2O3 | CaO | MgO | K2O | Na2O | LOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.67 | 49.43 | 12.93 | 4.19 | 1.89 | 1.59 | 2.609 | 18.71 |
Main chemical compositions of HAMB (wt.%).
| Fe2O3 | Al2O3 | SiO2 | TiO2 | CaO | MgO | K2O | Na2O | LOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.29 | 16.37 | 57.63 | 0.16 | 3.63 | 4.45 | 0.31 | 0.06 | 15.01 |
Figure 1Schematic figure of the self-equipped device for drying test.
Properties of prepared green pellets.
| Binder Type | Pellet Moisture | Dropping | Wet Strength | Cracking |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Units | % | Times·0.5 m−1 | N·Pellet−1 | °C |
| 1.00% bentonite | 8.87 | 3.8 | 16.91 | 425 |
| 0.50% HMA | 8.99 | 2.3 | 15.32 | 413 |
| 0.50% HAMB | 9.03 | 4.3 | 16.34 | 421 |
Figure 2Drying characteristic curve of different wind temperature (A) and wind flow rate (B) on green pellets containing bentonite.
Figure 3Drying characteristic curves of (A) MHA and (B) HAMB at different wind temperatures.
Figure 4Drying characteristic curve of green pellets with different binders under same drying conditions.
Figure 5The relationship between moisture content in the pellet and compression strength.
Figure 6FTIR analysis of MHA at different heating times (A) and heating temperatures (B).
Effects of heating temperature on content of chemical groups in humic acid.
| Chemical Groups (mmol/g) | 25 °C | 100 °C | 200 °C | 300 °C | 400 °C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carboxyl group | 0.232 | 0.044 | 0.022 | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Phenolic hydroxyl group | 4.668 | 1.326 | 1.248 | 1.08 | 0.87 |
Figure 7TG-DSC results of (A) HAMB, (B) MHA, and (C) bentonite.