| Literature DB >> 36234300 |
Qiao Liao1, Jianyu Li1, Jianping Liu2, Shulin Lü1, Lu Chen1, Wei Guo1, Shusen Wu1.
Abstract
In this paper, the refinement effect of Al-5Ti-0.2C refiner on Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys was first investigated, and then the effects of three forming processes, i.e., Gravity Casting (GC), Squeeze Casting (SC), and Squeeze Casting after Ultrasonic Treatment (UT-SC), on microstructure and properties of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys were studied. The results show that the refining effect of Al-5Ti-0.2C refiner is obvious; first, the average grain size of the alloy decreases and then increases with the increase in Ti content from 0.15 wt.% to 0.3 wt.%. The optimal amount of added Al-5Ti-0.2C is 0.2 wt.% Ti content. The good refining effect is attributed to the formation of TiC particles and Al3Ti compounds by the refiner, which can all be the nucleus of solidification. The poor refining effect when the Ti content was more than 0.2 wt.% is due to the formation of coarse Al3Ti particles. The results of three forming processes that cast Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys under the addition of Al-5Ti-0.2C with 0.2 wt.% Ti content show that the mechanical properties under the UT-SC process are the best; the tensile strength in the as-cast state reaches 367 MPa, and the elongation is 3.84%. The effect of tiny TiC particles in the refiner on the microstructure and properties of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys is also discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Al-5Ti-0.2C refiner; Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy; ultrasonic vibration
Year: 2022 PMID: 36234300 PMCID: PMC9572114 DOI: 10.3390/ma15196960
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Compositions of the alloy samples (in wt.%) and casting processes.
| Zn | Mg | Cu | Cr | Mn | Ti | Al | Casting Process |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.43 | 1.96 | 2.06 | <0.05 | <0.1 | 0.16 | Bal. | GC |
| 6.45 | 1.94 | 2.07 | <0.05 | <0.1 | 0.20 | Bal. | |
| 6.44 | 1.92 | 2.03 | <0.05 | <0.1 | 0.24 | Bal. | |
| 6.46 | 1.95 | 2.04 | <0.05 | <0.1 | 0.31 | Bal. | |
| 6.44 | 1.93 | 2.03 | <0.05 | <0.1 | 0.21 | Bal. | SC or UT-SC |
Figure 1Diagram of ultrasonic vibration treatment equipment.
Figure 2The morphology of grain refiner Al-5Ti-0.2C: (a) Overall distribution of Al3Ti in Al-5Ti-0.2C; (b) The distribution of TiC.
Figure 3OM (optical microscope) images of alloys with different Ti contents: (a) 0.15 wt.%; (b) 0.20 wt.%; (c) 0.25 wt.%; (d) 0.30 wt.%.
Figure 4Particle distribution of alloys with different Ti content: (a–c) 0.20 wt.%; (d) 0.30 wt.%.
EDS results of phases in Figure 5 (at. %).
| Spectrum | Al | Zn | Mg | Cu | Ti | C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | - | - | 69.62 | 30.38 |
| 2 | 63.71 | 11.6 | 14.71 | 9.8 | - | - |
| 3 | 74.65 | - | - | - | 25.35 | - |
| 4 | 78.18 | 7.74 | 8.9 | 5.18 | - | - |
Figure 5XRD patterns of alloys with different Ti contents.
Figure 6Tensile strength of GC samples with different Ti contents.
Figure 7Microstructure of SC samples and UT-SC samples with 0.2 wt.% Ti: (a) OM image alloys with SC process; (b) OM image with UT-SC process; (c,d) different magnification of samples with UT-SC process.
Figure 8XRD patterns of alloys with different casting processes.
Figure 9Tensile properties of alloys with different processes in as-cast state.
Figure 10Al-Ti partial phase diagram in the Al-rich side.
The ultimate tensile strength (MPa) of alloy samples with different refiners.
| Ti Addition and Casting Process | Al-5Ti Refiner | Al-5Ti-0.2C Refiner |
|---|---|---|
| 0.15 wt.% Ti + GC | - | 182 ± 2 |
| 0.20 wt.% Ti + GC | 251 ± 3 | 270 ± 5 |
| 0.25 wt.% Ti + GC | - | 244 ± 2 |
| 0.30 wt.% Ti + GC | - | 245 ± 2 |
| 0.20 wt.% Ti + SC | 326 ± 5 | 352 ± 4 |
| 0.20 wt.% Ti + UT-SC | 340 ± 3 | 367 ± 4 |