| Literature DB >> 36234188 |
Jin Yang1,2, Tie Wang1, Xingyang He1,2, Ying Su1,2, Fei Dai1,2, Long Xiong3, Rixu Zhao3, Xuyang Duan4.
Abstract
Secondary lining concrete is frequently used in underground tunnels. Due to the internal restriction of the annular concrete segment, micro-cracks may be caused by temperature stress and volume deformation, thus affecting the safe transportation of the tunnel. The purpose of this study is to provide a concrete experimental basis with low hydration heat and low shrinkage for tunnel engineering with different construction requirements. Different amounts of expansion agent (EA), shrinkage-reducing agent (SRA), and superabsorbent polymer (SAP) were considered in commercial concrete. It was found that EA elevated the degree of hydration and the hydration exothermic rate, while SRA and SAP showed the opposite regularity. SRA has the optimum shrinkage reduction performance with a 79% reduction in shrinkage, but the strength decreases significantly compared to EA and SAP groups. The effect of the combination of different shrinkage reducing components in commercial concrete is instructive for the hydration rate and shrinkage compensation in secondary lining engineering.Entities:
Keywords: commercial concrete; low shrinkage; secondary lining engineering
Year: 2022 PMID: 36234188 PMCID: PMC9572792 DOI: 10.3390/ma15196848
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1Schematic diagram of secondary lining engineering of underground tunnel.
Figure 2Particle size distribution and cumulative curve distribution of materials.
Chemical composition of materials (%).
| MgO | Al2O3 | SiO2 | SO3 | CaO | Fe2O3 | P2O5 | K2O | LOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cement | 2.27 | 6.221 | 20.835 | 3.322 | 58.176 | 3.315 | 0.109 | 0.947 | 4.802 |
| GGBS | 7.45 | 15.707 | 31.58 | 3.813 | 39.313 | 0.289 | 0.029 | 0.398 | 4.079 |
| SF | 0.98 | 0.219 | 90.81 | 1.122 | 0.4 | 0.056 | 0.124 | 0.917 | 1.416 |
| FA | 0.63 | 41.343 | 42.479 | 1.215 | 5.34 | 3.719 | 0.362 | 0.827 | 5.37 |
| EA | 1.96 | 2.567 | 4.61 | 17.663 | 58.484 | 1.214 | 0.027 | 0.233 | 13.262 |
Figure 3XRD patterns of materials.
Proportions of concrete mix (kg/m3).
| Code | Cement | FA | GGBS | SF | Sand | Gravel | Water | EA | SRA | SAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 270 | 150 | 75 | 20 | 860 | 880 | 175 | |||
| EA-4% | 270 | 150 | 75 | 20 | 860 | 880 | 175 | 20.6 | ||
| EA-8% | 270 | 150 | 75 | 20 | 860 | 880 | 175 | 41.2 | ||
| EA-12% | 270 | 150 | 75 | 20 | 860 | 880 | 175 | 61.8 | ||
| SRA-1% | 270 | 150 | 75 | 20 | 860 | 880 | 175 | 5.15 | ||
| SRA-2% | 270 | 150 | 75 | 20 | 860 | 880 | 175 | 10.3 | ||
| SRA-3% | 270 | 150 | 75 | 20 | 860 | 880 | 175 | 15.45 | ||
| SAP-0.2% | 270 | 150 | 75 | 20 | 860 | 880 | 186.3 | 1.03 | ||
| SAP-0.4% | 270 | 150 | 75 | 20 | 860 | 880 | 197.6 | 2.06 | ||
| SAP-0.6% | 270 | 150 | 75 | 20 | 860 | 880 | 208.9 | 3.09 |
Figure 4SEM and adsorption kinetics of spherical resin.
Figure 5Water absorption of SAP in different liquid environments.
Figure 6Rheological curves of cement pastes with different shrinkage-reducing components: (a) EA (b) SRA (c) SAP.
Rheology parameters of compound pastes.
| Sample ID | τ0/Pa | μ/Pa·s | Fitting Equation | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cement | 21.11257 | 0.82807 | τ = 21.11257 + 0.82807γ − 1.29 × 10−3γ2 | 0.99318 |
| EA-4% | 10.42214 | 0.80191 | τ = 10.42214 + 0.80191γ − 8.58388 × 10−4γ2 | 0.99759 |
| EA-8% | 10.69963 | 1.31995 | τ = 10.69963 + 1.31995γ − 2.52 × 10−3γ2 | 0.99572 |
| EA-12% | 20.31382 | 1.48647 | τ = 20.31382 + 1.48647γ − 3.08 × 10−3γ2 | 0.99617 |
| SRA-1% | 14.94641 | 1.03673 | τ = 14.94641 + 1.03673γ − 1.39 × 10−3γ2 | 0.99748 |
| SRA-2% | 18.19536 | 0.787 | τ = 18.19536 + 0.787γ − 1.11 × 10−3γ2 | 0.99657 |
| SRA-3% | 10.249 | 0.58992 | τ = 10.249 + 0.58992γ − 7.8803 × 10−4γ2 | 0.99617 |
| SAP-0.2% | 27.09619 | 0.54142 | τ = 27.09619 + 0.54142γ − 3.68807 × 10−4γ2 | 0.99902 |
| SAP-0.4% | 39.72358 | 0.51597 | τ = 39.72358 + 0.51597γ + 5.06153 × 10−6γ2 | 0.99948 |
| SAP-0.6% | 39.88603 | 0.37507 | τ = 39.88603 + 0.0.37507γ + 3.8843 × 10−5γ2 | 0.99893 |
Figure 7Hydration heat kinetics of pastes with different shrinkage compensation admixtures: (a) EA (b) SRA (c) SAP.
Figure 8Compressive strength of secondary lining concrete at 3 d, 7 d and 28 d: (a) EA (b) SRA (c) SAP.
Figure 9Autogenous shrinkage of secondary lining concretes: (a) EA (b) SRA (c) SAP.
Figure 10The different shrinkage-reducing components on the 28 d capillary water absorption of concrete: (a) total water uptake; (b) slope of S1 adsorption phase; (c) slope of S2 adsorption phase.
Figure 11Influence of the electrical flux of concrete with the different shrinkage-reducing components.
Figure 12Influence of the different shrinkage reducing components on cement mortars: (a) the cumulative pore volume and (b) the pore size distribution.
Pore volume and porosity of hardened mortars samples.
| Samples | Porosity (mL/g) | Pore Volume Fraction (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <10 nm | 10–50 nm | 50–100 nm | 100 nm–10 μm | >10 μm | ||
| Control | 0.0671 | 18.25 | 38.6 | 3.36 | 29.05 | 10.74 |
| EA-8% | 0.0925 | 23.86 | 48.39 | 2.11 | 14.65 | 10.99 |
| SRA-2% | 0.0979 | 17.32 | 34.51 | 3.16 | 32.17 | 12.84 |
| SAP-0.4% | 0.05 | 19.45 | 37.41 | 9.2 | 13.43 | 20.51 |