| Literature DB >> 36234135 |
Yilun Huang1, Shizhen Zhi1, Shengnan Zhang2, Wenqing Yao1, Weiqin Ao1, Chaohua Zhang1, Fusheng Liu1, Junqin Li1, Lipeng Hu1.
Abstract
In thermoelectrics, entropy engineering as an emerging paradigm-shifting strategy can simultaneously enhance the crystal symmetry, increase the solubility limit of specific elements, and reduce the lattice thermal conductivity. However, the severe lattice distortion in high-entropy materials blocks the carrier transport and hence results in an extremely low carrier mobility. Herein, the design principle for selecting alloying species is introduced as an effective strategy to compensate for the deterioration of carrier mobility in GeTe-based alloys. It demonstrates that high configurational entropy via progressive MnZnCdTe3 and Sb co-alloying can promote the rhombohedral-cubic phase transition temperature toward room temperature, which thus contributes to the enhanced density-of-states effective mass. Combined with the reduced carrier concentration via the suppressed Ge vacancies by high-entropy effect and Sb donor doping, a large Seebeck coefficient is attained. Meanwhile, the severe lattice distortions and micron-sized Zn0.6Cd0.4Te precipitations restrain the lattice thermal conductivity approaching to the theoretical minimum value. Finally, the maximum zT of Ge0.82Sb0.08Te0.90(MnZnCdTe3)0.10 reaches 1.24 at 723 K via the trade-off between the degraded carrier mobility and the improved Seebeck coefficient, as well as the depressed lattice thermal conductivity. These results provide a reference for the implementation of entropy engineering in GeTe and other thermoelectric materials.Entities:
Keywords: GeTe; entropy engineering; lattice distortion; phase transition; thermoelectric
Year: 2022 PMID: 36234135 PMCID: PMC9572701 DOI: 10.3390/ma15196798
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1Room temperature (a) configurational entropy ΔS, (b) powder XRD patterns, (c) lattice parameter a and c, and (d) DSC curves and the obtained phase transition temperature Tc of GeTe-based alloys.
Figure 2The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and the X-ray energy dispersive spectrum (EDS) elemental spot scanning of the polished Ge0.82Sb0.08Te0.90(MnZnCdTe3)0.10. The element mapping of (a) Ge, (b) Te, (c) Mn, (d) Cd, (e) Zn, (f) Sb, and (g) the X-ray energy dispersive spectrum analysis, indicating the micron-sized Zn0.6Cd0.4Te precipitations are existed.
Figure 3The room temperature (a) carrier concentration nH, and (b) carrier mobility μH of Ge1−SbTe1−(MnZnCdTe3) samples.
Figure 4Temperature dependence of (a) electrical conductivity σ, (b) Seebeck coefficient α, and (d) power factor PF for (GeTe)1−(MnZnCdTe3) and Ge0.82−SbTe0.90(MnZnCdTe3)0.10 samples. (c) Room temperature Seebeck coefficient α as a function of carrier concentration nH for Ge1−SbTe1−(MnZnCdTe3) samples.
Figure 5Temperature dependences of (a) total thermal conductivity κ, (b) lattice thermal conductivity κL, and (c) zT of (GeTe)1−(MnZnCdTe3) and Ge0.82−SbTe0.90(MnZnCdTe3)0.10 samples. (d) The average zTave values between 298–723 K for our GeTe-based alloys.