| Literature DB >> 36233295 |
Juliana Gurgel-Giannetti1, Lucas Santos Souza2, Guilherme L Yamamoto2, Marina Belisario1, Monize Lazar2, Wilson Campos3, Rita de Cassia M Pavanello2, Mayana Zatz2, Umbertina Reed4, Edmar Zanoteli4, Acary Bulle Oliveira5, Vilma-Lotta Lehtokari6, Erasmo B Casella7, Marcela C Machado-Costa8, Carina Wallgren-Pettersson6, Nigel G Laing9, Vincenzo Nigro10, Mariz Vainzof2.
Abstract
Nemaline myopathy (NM), a structural congenital myopathy, presents a significant clinical and genetic heterogeneity. Here, we compiled molecular and clinical data of 30 Brazilian patients from 25 unrelated families. Next-generation sequencing was able to genetically classify all patients: sixteen families (64%) with mutation in NEB, five (20%) in ACTA1, two (8%) in KLHL40, and one in TPM2 (4%) and TPM3 (4%). In the NEB-related families, 25 different variants, 11 of them novel, were identified; splice site (10/25) and frame shift (9/25) mutations were the most common. Mutation c.24579 G>C was recurrent in three unrelated patients from the same region, suggesting a common ancestor. Clinically, the "typical" form was the more frequent and caused by mutations in the different NM genes. Phenotypic heterogeneity was observed among patients with mutations in the same gene. Respiratory involvement was very common and often out of proportion with limb weakness. Muscle MRI patterns showed variability within the forms and genes, which was related to the severity of the weakness. Considering the high frequency of NEB mutations and the complexity of this gene, NGS tools should be combined with CNV identification, especially in patients with a likely non-identified second mutation.Entities:
Keywords: acta1; congenital myopathy; nebulin; nemaline myopathy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36233295 PMCID: PMC9569467 DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911995
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Clinical and molecular data of the patients. Abbreviations: ACMG: American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics; NIV: Non-invasive ventilation; VUS: Variant of uncertain significance.
| Case, Sex | Family | Clinical Phenotype | Molecular Analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at Last Evaluation and Clinical Findings | Gene | Mutations | Type/Segregation | ACMG 6/2022 | ||
| 1 | Family 1 | Typical |
| NM_001100.4:exon4:c.541G>C: | Missense | Likely Pathogenic |
| 2 | Family 2 | Typical |
| NM_001100.4:c.130-5T>A | Splice site | VUS |
| 3 | Family 3 | Severe |
| NM_001100.4:exon4:c.478G>A: | Missense | Likely Pathogenic PM2 |
| 4 | Family 4 | Typical |
| NM_001100.4:c.478G>A: | Missense | Likely Pathogenic PM2 |
| 5 | Family 5 | Typical |
| NM_001100.4:c.854T>G: | Missense | Likely Pathogenic PM2 |
| 6 | Family 6 | Typical |
| NM_003289.4:c.20_22 del: | Frameshift | Pathogenic |
| 7 | Family 7 | Typical |
| NM_152263.4:c.502C>T: | Missense | Pathogenic |
| 8 | Typical | NM_152263.4:c.502C>T: | ||||
| 9 | Family 8 | Mild |
| NM_001164507.1:c.8501delA: p.(Lys2834ArgfsTer28) | Frameshift | Pathogenic |
| NM_001164507.1:c.1674+2T>C | Splice site | Pathogenic PVS1 PM2 PS4_Supporting PP4 | ||||
| 10 | Family 9 | Typical |
| NM_001164507.1:exon170:c.24189_24192dup | Frameshift | Pathogenic PVS1 PM2 PS4_Supporting PP4 |
| NM_001164507.1:exon134:c.20466+2T>A | Splice site | Pathogenic PVS1 PM2 PM3_Supporting PP4 | ||||
| 11 | Family 10 | Typical |
| NM_001164507.1:exon172:c.24304_24305dup: | Frameshift | Pathogenic |
| 12 | Typical | NM_001164507.1:exon172:c.24304_24305dup: | Frameshift | Pathogenic | ||
| 13 | Family 11 | Typical |
| NM_001164507.1:exon 63 c.8889+1G>A p.(?) | Splice site | Pathogenic PVS1 PM2 PS4_Moderate PP4 |
| NM_001164507.1:c.6869_6870insTGC: | Non-frameshift duplication | VUS | ||||
| 14 | Family 12 | Typical |
| NM_001164507.1:exon151:c.22170G>A: | Stop-gain | Pathogenic PVS1 PM2 PS4_Supporting PM3_Supporting PP4 |
| NM_001164507.1:exon174: c.24579G>C; | Splicing | Likely Pathogenic PM2 PS4_Supporting PP3 PM3_Supporting PP4 | ||||
| 15 | Family 13 | Typical |
| NM_001164507.1:exon176:c.24735_24736del: | Frameshift deletion | Pathogenic PVS1 PM2 PS4_Supporting PP4 |
| NEB_NM_001164507.1:IVS122:c.19102-8_19102-4del | Splice site | VUS | ||||
| 16 | Family 14 | Typical |
| NM_001164507.1:exon174: c.24579G>C; | Splice site | Likely Pathogenic PM2 PS4_Supporting PP3 PM3_Supporting PP4 |
| NM_001164507.1:exon48:c.6078delA | Frameshift | Pathogenic PVS1, PM2 PS4_Supporting PP4 PM3_Supporting | ||||
| 17 | Family 15 | Typical |
| NM_001164507.1:exon151:c.22170G>A: | Stop-gain | Pathogenic PVS1 PM2 PS4_Supporting PP4 |
| NM_001164507.1:exon174: c.24579G>C; | Splice site | Likely Pathogenic PM2 PS4_Supporting PP3 PM3_Supporting PP4 | ||||
| 18 | Family 16 | Typical |
| NM_001164507.1: exon173: c.23601_23602del: | Frameshift | Pathogenic |
| 19 | Typical | NM_001164507.1Int28:c.2835+5G>C | Splice site | VUS | ||
| 20 | Family 17 | Typical |
| NM_001164507.1:c.23878_23881dup | Frameshift | Pathogenic |
| NM_001164507.1:c.25405-1G>C | Splice site | Pathogenic | ||||
| 21 | Family 18 | Typical |
| NM_001164507.1:c.1623delT: | Frameshift heterozygous | Pathogenic |
| Motor Chip (V. Nigro): duplicação 82 a 105 | CNV | |||||
| 22 | Family 19 | Typical |
| NM_001164507.1:exon34:c.3648del | Frameshift | Pathogenic |
| del exon 29 | CNV | Pathogenic | ||||
| 23 | Family 20 | Mild |
| NM_001164507:exon43:c.5343+5G>A | Splicing | Likely pathogenic |
| 24 | Mild | NM_001164507:exon43:c.5343+5G>A | Splicing | Likely pathogenic | ||
| 25 | Family 21 | Typical |
| NM_001164507.1:c.21076C>T | Stop-gain | Pathogenic PVS1 PM2 PS4_Moderate PP4 |
| NM_001164507.1:c.24192_24193insTCAA | Frameshift | Pathogenic | ||||
| 26 | Family 22 | Typical |
| NM_001164507.1:exon129:c.19944G>A: | Splice site | Likely Pathogenic PM2 |
| NM_001164507.1:exon105:c.16423A>T: | Stop-gain | Pathogenic | ||||
| 27 | Family 23 | Typical |
| NM_001164507:exon43:c.5343+5G>A | Splice site | Likely Pathogenic PM2 |
| 28 | Typical | NEB:NM_001164507:exon29:c.2943G>A | Splice site | Likely pathogenic | ||
| 29 | Family 24 | Severe |
| NM_152393.4:c.1405G>A: | Missense | VUS |
| NM_152393.4:c.1498C>T: | Missense | VUS | ||||
| 30 | Family 25 | Severe | KLHL40 | NM_152393.4:c.1405G>A: | Missense | VUS |
| NM_152393.4:c.1498C>T: | Missense | VUS | ||||
Figure 1Muscle biopsy showing the presence and distribution of nemaline bodies inside myofibers: on the left picture, from P1, there are predominantly large rods in subsarcolemmal region; on the right picture, from P20, there are predominantly small intermyofibrillar rods (magnification ×20).
Muscle MRI: Pattern of muscle involvement in nemaline patients.
| Case | Age at | Gene | Muscle MRI or CT (Mercuri Grade *) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thigh: | Legs: | |||
| P2 | 4 years |
| No involvement | Tibialis anterior muscle: grade IIa |
| P3 | 8 years |
| Diffuse fat infiltration of thigh muscles: grade III | Diffuse fat infiltration: grade III |
| P6 | 12 years |
| Vastus lateralis and rectus femoris muscles: grade I | Soleus muscle: grade IIb |
| P7 | 13 years |
| Sartorius muscle: grade IIb | Soleus muscles: grade I |
| P14 | 17 years |
| Diffuse fat infiltration of thigh muscles: grade I | Tibialis anterior muscle: grade III |
| P15 | 15 years |
| Diffuse fat infiltration of thigh muscles: grade I | Tibialis anterior muscle: grade IIa |
| P16 | 17 years |
| Adductor longus muscle: grade III | Tibialis anterior muscle: grade IV |
| P17 | 14 years |
| Diffuse fat infiltration of thigh muscles: grade I | Tibialis anterior muscle: grade II |
| P21 | 7 years |
| Adductor longus muscle: grade I | Tibialis anterior muscle: grade IIa |
* Semi-quantitative visual rating scale described by Mercuri et al., 2002 and Watjjes et al., 2010 [42,43].
Figure 2MRI pattern in patients with mutations in the ACTA1 and NEB genes: (A,B) patients with mutations in the ACTA1 gene. In (A), there is a diffuse infiltration in the thigh and legs in P3 (severe form); in (B), there is isolate involvement of tibial anterior in the legs in P2 (typical form). (C,D) patients with nebulin mutations; in (C), we observe a diffuse infiltration in the thigh and legs in a patient with severe weakness who never walked (P21); In (D), we observe that the predominant involvement was in the anterior tibial and soleus muscles, while the thigh muscles were spared (P15).
Figure 3MRI pattern in patients with mutations in the TPM2 and TPM3 genes. In P6 with TPM2 mutation, the whole-body MRI showed facial involvement, mainly temporal and lateral pterygoid muscles, and distal involvement in lower legs. In P7 with TPM3, the muscle MRI showed fat infiltration in thigh muscles, especially sartorius and adductor magnus, and predominant involvement of the anterior compartment of the leg.