| Literature DB >> 36233282 |
Matheus Santos de Sousa Fernandes1,2, Gabriela Carvalho Jurema Santos3, Tayrine Ordonio Filgueira4,5, Dayane Aparecida Gomes1, Elias Almeida Silva Barbosa4, Tony Meireles Dos Santos1,6, Niels Olsen Saraiva Câmara7, Angela Castoldi4,5,8, Fabricio Oliveira Souto4,5,8.
Abstract
Environmental Enrichment (EE) is based on the promotion of socio-environmental stimuli, which mimic favorable environmental conditions for the practice of physical activity and health. The objective of the present systematic review was to evaluate the influence of EE on pro-and anti-inflammatory immune parameters, but also in cell activation related to the innate and acquired immune responses in the brain and peripheral tissues in rodents. Three databases [PubMed (2209 articles), Scopus (1154 articles), and Science Direct (1040 articles)] were researched. After applying the eligibility criteria, articles were selected for peer review, independently, as they were identified by September 2021. The protocol for this systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO. Of the 4417 articles found, 16 were selected for this systematic review. In the brain, EE promoted a reduction in proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines. In the blood, EE promoted a higher percentage of leukocytes, an increase in CD19+ B lymphocytes, and the proliferation of Natura Killer (NK cells). In the bone marrow, there was an increase in the number of CD27- and CD11b+ mature NK cells and a reduction in CD27- and CD11b+ immature Natural Killer cells. In conclusion, EE can be an immune modulation approach and plays a key role in the prevention of numerous chronic diseases, including cancer, that have a pro-inflammatory response and immunosuppressive condition as part of their pathophysiology.Entities:
Keywords: blood; bone marrow; brain; cytokines; enriched environment; inflammation; macrophages
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36233282 PMCID: PMC9570198 DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911986
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Sample search strategy on the database.
| Database | Code Line |
|---|---|
| Pubmed/Medline | (((Environmental Enrichment) OR (Enriched Environment)) AND ((((((((Immune System) OR (Immune Systems)) OR (System, Immune)) OR (Inflammation)) OR (Inflammations)) OR (Innate Inflammatory Response)) OR (Cytokine)) OR (Cytokines)). |
| ScienceDirect | (((“Exercise”) OR (“Physical Activity”)) OR (“Physical Exercise”)) AND ((((“Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress”) OR (“Endoplasmic Reticulum Stresses”)) OR (“Stress, Endoplasmic Reticulum”)) |
Figure 1PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews which included searches of databases and registers only. Consider, if feasible to do so, reporting the number of records identified from each database or register searched (rather than the total number across all databases/registers); ** If automation tools were used, indicate how many records were excluded by a human and how many were excluded by automation tools.
Eligibility criteria based on the PICOS strategy.
| Inclusion Criteria | Exclusion Criteria | |
|---|---|---|
| Rodents | Humans and other species | |
| Environmental Enrichment | Absence of the Environmental Enrichment | |
| Animals that did not undergo Environmental Enrichment | Absence of the control group | |
| Cytokines and immune cells | No Cytokines and immune cells | |
| Experimental | Observational, reviews, case reports, and scientific abstracts |
Methodological Quality of Studies using the SYRCLE strategy.
| Study | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Q10 | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ali et al., 2019 [ | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
| Arranz et al., 2010 [ | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
| Brod et al., 2017 [ | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
| Ferré et al., 2016 [ | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
| Gurfein et al., 2017 [ | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
| Keymoradzadeh et al., 2020 [ | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
| Marashi et al., 2003 [ | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
| McQuaid et al., 2013 [ | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
| Meng et al., 2018 [ | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
| Rattazi et al., 2016 [ | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
| Takai et al., 2019 [ | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
| Wang et al., 2018 [ | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
| Williamson et al., 2012 [ | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
| Zarif et al., 2017 [ | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
| Zhang et al., 2017 [ | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
Notes: Q1: Was the allocation sequence adequately generated and applied? Q2: Were the groups similar at baseline or were they adjusted for confounders in the analysis? Q3: Was the allocation to the different groups adequately concealed during? Q4: Were the animals randomly housed during the experiment? Q5: Were the caregivers and/or investigators blinded from knowledge of which intervention each animal received during the experiment? Q6: Were the animals selected at random for the outcome assessment? Q7: Was the outcome assessor blinded? Q8: Were incomplete outcome data adequately addressed? Q9: Are reports of the study free of selective outcome reporting? Q10: Was the study apparently free of other problems that could result in high risk of bias? Unclear; Y: Yes; N: No.
Sample description and characterization of environmental enrichment protocols and Brain outcomes.
| Author, Year | Species/Sex and Age | Environmental Enrichment Protocol, Animals Data, and Housing Dimensions (Length, Width, and Depth) | Exposure Time to Environmental Enrichment | Brain Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ali, 2019 [ | C57BL/6N mice, Female, and 10 months old | Wheels, tunnels, igloos, huts, retreats, wood toys, and a maze in addition to standard chow and water. n = 5 and 63 cm × 49 cm × 44 cm | 10 months | |
| Arranz, 2010 [ | ICR/CD-1 mice, Female, Adults: 44 ± 4 weeks, Old: 69 ± 4 weeks, Very Old: 92 ± 4 weeks | Range bucket, jolly ball, hoop, holed ball, yellow tunnel, rough red object, yellow billiard ball, and silver ball. Uninformed and Uniformed. | 6–8 weeks | - |
| Brod, 2017 [ | CD1 mice, male and 6 weeks old | Wheel, nest house, tunnel, ample nesting material, and wood chip bedding to a 5 cm depth. Uninformed and 50 × 38 cm × 21 cm. | 2 weeks | - |
| Ferré, 2016 [ | SAMP8 mice, Male and 3 months old | Plastic tubes (20 cm long and 2.5 cm in diameter) were placed in EE cardboard cages, moreover to plastic dolls or toys, which were added, removed, or changed every week. Uninformed and Uninformed. | Uninformed | |
| Gurfein, 2017 [ | BALB/c mice, Male and 6 weeks old | Uninformed, n = 10 and 257 mm × 483 mm × 152 mm = 980 cm2 | 9 weeks | - |
| Keymoradzadeh, 2020 [ | Wistar Rats, Male and 7 weeks old | Running wheels, a tunnel, a small compartment, stairs, and many other colorful objects (e.g., colorful plastic plates, wooden disks of varied colors and sizes, plastic cups, and hanging cubes). n = 7 and 96 cm × 49 cm × 38 cm. | 3 weeks | |
| Marashi, 2003 [ | Strain CS of the inbred strain ABG mice, Male and uniformed | Passable enriched cage, extra plains, plastic stairs, wooden footpaths, hemp ropes, and a climbing tree. n = 4 and 100 cm × 40 cm × 34.5 cm | Uninformed | |
| Mcquaid, 2013 [ | BALB/cByJ mice, male and 6–8 weeks old | Two running wheels, one red polypropylene shelter, one orange polypropylene shelter with an angled running wheel, as well as three yellow polypropylene tunnels and two cotton nestlets. Uninformed and 50 cm × 40 cm × 20 cm. | 4 weeks | |
| Meng, 2018 [ | C57BL/6N mice/Male/3 or 10 weeks old | Running wheels, wood toys, plastic tunnels, ladders, huts, and nesting materials. Toys were changed every 3–4 days. n = 12 and 61 cm × 43 cm × 21 cm. | 5 weeks | - |
| Otaki, 2018 [ | B6C3F1/Cr1 mice/Male and 3 weeks | Running wheels, tunnel, bio-hut, wood gnawing block, shelter, and nesting sheet. n = 5 and Uniformed. | 6–8 weeks | - |
| Rattazi, 2016 [ | C57BL/6N mice/Male and 6 weeks | Colored transparent plastic nest-box, fabric tube, running wheel, and one wood hamster swing. n = 6 and 40 cm × 25 cm × 20 cm. | 2 weeks | - |
| Takai, 2019 [ | B6C3F1/mice/Female and 6 weeks old | Uninformed, n = 8–24 and Uninformed. | 6 weeks | - |
| Wang, 2018 [ | C57BL/6N mice/Male and 18 months old | Uninformed, n = 4 and 47 cm × 30 cm × 23 cm | 2 months | |
| Williamson, 2012 [ | Sprague -Dawley | Quarter-inch corn-cob bedding (identical to home cage controls), a running wheel, a PVC tube, and various small objects and toys. n = 6–8; 55.9 cm × 35.6 cm × 30.5 cm | 7 weeks | |
| Zarif, 2017 [ | C57BL/6N mice/Female and 4 weeks | Nesting material, houses, running wheels, hammocks, scales, plastic toys, and tunnels. n = 5–6, 120 cm × 76 cm × 21 cm | 1–4 weeks | |
| Zhang, 2017 [ | C57BL/6 N mice and 10 weeks old | Plastic tunnels, wooden climbing frame, platforms, hiding shelters, house, exercise wheel, chew toys, and other novel objects designed specifically for small animals = 20 and 56 cm × 40 cm × 22 cm. | 3 weeks |
Notes: cm: centimeters, CCL2: Chemokine C-C Ligand 2; CCL3: Chemokine C-C Ligand 3; CXCL2: C-X-C Chemokine Ligand 2; CXCL10: C-X-C Chemokine Ligand 10; IKKβ: Inhibitor of Nuclear Factor Kappa-B Kinase Subunit Beta; p-IKKβ: Inhibitor of Nuclear Factor Kappa-B Kinase Subunit Beta Phosphorylated; IL-1b: Interleukin-1 Beta, pro-IL-1b: pro-Interleukin-1 Beta; IL-1r: Interleukin-1 receptor; IL-6: Interleukin-6; IL-6r: Interleukin-6 receptor; IL-10: Interleukin-10; Lymphocyte antigen 6 complex, locus g; MCP-1: Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1; NFkbia: Nuclear Factor Kappa B inhibitor alpha; P65: Protein 65; p-P65: Protein 65 Phosphorylated; SOCS3: Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 3; TNF-α: Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; TNF-β: Tumor Necrosis Factor-Beta;TNF-r1β: Tumor Necrosis Factor receptor 1 Beta; TNF-rsfla: Tumor Necrosis Factor receptor superfamily member 1A. = There were no significant differences.
Figure 2Impacts of environmental enrichment protocols on the activity of different cells of the immune system and expression of pro and anti-inflammatory cytokines in central (Hypothalamus, Prefrontal Cortex, Amygdala, and Hippocampus) and peripheral tissues (Peritoneal cavity, Thymus, Lymph nodes, Spleen, Blood Tissue, or Bone Marrow) and Lymphocytes.
Sample description and characterization of environmental enrichment protocols and Cytokines and Immune Cells in Peripheral Tissues.
| Author, Year | Species/Sex and Age | Environmental Enrichment Protocol, Animals Data, and Housing Dimensions | Exposure Time to Environmental Enrichment | Peripheral Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ali, 2019 [ | C57BL/6N mice, Female, and 10 months old | Wheels, tunnels, igloos, huts, retreats, wood toys, and a maze in addition to standard chow and water. n = 5 and 63 cm × 49 cm × 44 cm | 10 months | |
| Arranz, 2010 [ | ICR/CD-1 mice, Female, Adults: 44 ± 4 weeks, Old: 69 ± 4 weeks, Very Old: 92 ± 4 weeks | Range bucket, jolly ball, hoop, holed ball, yellow tunnel, rough red object, yellow billiard ball, and silver ball. Uninformed and Uniformed. | 6–8 weeks | |
| Brod, 2017 [ | CD1 mice, Male and 6 weeks old | Wheel, nest house, tunnel, ample nesting material, and wood chip bedding to a 5 cm depth. Uninformed and 50 cm × 38 cm × 21 cm. | 2 weeks | - |
| Ferré, 2016 [ | SAMP8 mice, Male and 3 months old | Plastic tubes (20 cm long and 2.5 cm in diameter) were placed in EE cardboard cages, and plastic dolls or toys, which were added, removed, or changed every week. Uninformed and Uninformed. | Uninformed | |
| Gurfein, 2017 [ | BALB/c mice, Male and 6 weeks old | Uninformed, n = 10 and 257 mm × 483 mm × 152 mm = 980 cm2 | 9 weeks | - |
| Keymoradzadeh, 2020 [ | Wistar Rats, Male and 7 weeks old | Running wheels, a tunnel, a small compartment, stairs, and many other colorful objects (e.g., colorful plastic plates, wooden disks of varied colors and sizes, plastic cups, and hanging cubes). n = 7 and 96 cm × 49 cm × 38 cm. | 3 weeks | |
| Marashi, 2003 [ | Strain CS of the inbred strain ABG mice, Male and uniformed | Passable enriched cage, extra plains, plastic stairs, wooden footpaths, hemp ropes, and a climbing tree. n = 4 and 100 cm × 40 cm × 34.5 cm | Uninformed | - |
| Mcquaid, 2013 [ | BALB/cByJ mice, male and 6–8 weeks old | Two running wheels, one red polypropylene shelter, one orange polypropylene shelter with an angled running wheel, as well as three yellow polypropylene tunnels and two cotton nestles. Uninformed and 50 cm × 40 cm × 20 cm. | 4 weeks | |
| Meng, 2018 [ | C57BL/6N mice/Male/3 or 10 weeks old | Running wheels, wood toys, plastic tunnels, ladders, huts, and nesting materials. Toys were changed every 3–4 days. n = 12 and 61 cm × 43 cm × 21 cm. | 5 weeks | |
| Otaki, 2018 [ | B6C3F1/Cr1 mice/Male and 3 weeks | Running wheels, tunnel, bio-hut, wood gnawing block, shelter, and nesting sheet. n = 5 and Uniformed. | 6–8 weeks | |
| Rattazi, 2016 [ | C57BL/6N mice/Male and 6 weeks | Colored transparent plastic nest-box, fabric tube, running wheel, and one wood hamster swing. n = 6 and 40 cm × 25 cm × 20 cm. | 2 weeks | |
| Takai, 2019 [ | B6C3F1/mice/Female and 6 weeks old | Uninformed, n = 8–24 and Uninformed. | 6 weeks | - |
| Wang, 2018 [ | C57BL/6N mice/Male and 18 months old | Uninformed, n = 4 and 47 cm × 30 cm × 23 cm | 2 months | - |
| Williamson, 2012 [ | Sprague -Dawley | Quarter-inch corn-cob bedding (identical to home cage controls), a running wheel, a PVC tube, and various small objects and toys. n = 6–8; 55.9 cm × 35.6 cm × 30.5 cm | 7 weeks | |
| Zarif, 2017 [ | C57BL/6N mice/Female and 4 weeks | Nesting material, houses, running wheels, hammocks, scales, plastic toys, and tunnels. n = 5–6, 120 cm × 76 cm × 21 cm | 1–4 weeks | |
| Zhang, 2017 [ | C57BL/6N mice/Male and 10 weeks old | Plastic tunnels, wooden climbing frame, platforms, hiding shelters, house, exercise wheel, chew toys, and other novel objects designed specifically for small animals = 20 and 56 cm × 40 cm × 22 cm. | 3 weeks |
Notes: cm: centimeters, CD4: Cluster of Differentiation 4; CD8: Cluster of Differentiation 8; CD11b+: Cluster of Differentiation 11 b+; CD19b+: Cluster of Differentiation 19 b+; CD27: Cluster of Differentiation 27; CD38: Cluster of Differentiation 38; CD49b+: Cluster of Differentiation 49 b+; IL-2: Interleukin-2; IL-4: Interleukin-4; IL-6: Interleukin-6; IL-10: Interleukin-10; IL-17: Interleukin-17; IFN-γ: Interferon-gamma; Ly-6g+:Lymphocyte antigen 6 complex, locus g; MCP-1: Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1; NK: Natural Killer Cell; NOS2: Nitric Oxide Synthase 2; TLR2: Toll-Like Receptor-2; TLR4: Toll-Like Receptor-4; TNF-α: Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha;. = There were no significant differences.