| Literature DB >> 36232479 |
Maria Elena Hernandez-Hernandez1,2,3, Enrique Torres-Rasgado2,3, Patricia Pulido-Perez2,3, Leticia Nicolás-Toledo4, Margarita Martínez-Gómez4,5, Jorge Rodríguez-Antolín4, Ricardo Pérez-Fuentes2,3, Jose R Romero6.
Abstract
Oxidative stress plays an important role in vascular complications observed in patients with obesity and Type 2 Diabetes (T2D). Xanthine oxidase (XO) breaks down purine nucleotides into uric acid and contributes to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). However, the relationship between XO activity and glucose homeostasis in T2D subjects with obesity is unclear. We hypothesized that disordered glucose levels are associated with serum XO activity in overweight women and men with T2D and without hyperuricemia. We studied serum XO activity in women and men with and without T2D. Our results show that serum XO activity was greater in T2D patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2 than in those with BMI < 25 kg/m2 (p < 0.0001). Sex-based comparative analyses of overweight T2D patients showed that serum XO activity correlated with homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and hemoglobin A1C in overweight T2D women but not in overweight T2D men. In addition, as compared to overweight T2D men, women had higher high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels. However, overweight T2D men had higher XO activity and uric acid levels than women. Our results suggest that XO activity is higher in overweight T2D patients, especially in men, but is more sensitive to disordered glucose levels in overweight women with T2D.Entities:
Keywords: biological sex; obese; overweight; type 2 diabetic; xanthine oxidase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36232479 PMCID: PMC9569528 DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911177
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Clinical characteristics of the study participants according to T2D.
| Parameter | Non-T2D ( | T2D ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Men/women, | 56 (40.0)/84 (60.0) | 36 (41.4)/51 (58.6) | 0.890 |
| Age (years) | 45.0 (39.0–54.0) | 56.0 (46.0–61.0) | <0.0001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.4 (22.4–28.9) | 28.3 (25.0–31.6) | <0.0001 |
| FPG (mg/dL) | 94.0 (87.2–102.0) | 165.0 (127.0–229.0) | <0.0001 |
| A1C (%) | 5.1 (4.7–5.5) | 7.5 (6.6–10.4) | <0.0001 |
| FPI (mg/dL) | 8.1 (5.6–12.3) | 8.4 (5.7–13.0) | 0.393 |
| C-Peptide (mg/dL) | 2.1 (1.6–2.7) | 2.7 (2.1–3.3) | <0.0001 |
| HOMA-IR | 1.8 (1.3–2.7) | 3.4 (2.3–6.6) | <0.0001 |
| HOMA-β | 102.6 (69.1–133.0) | 33.6 (15.2–58.2) | <0.0001 |
| Uric Acid (mg/dL) | 5.0 (4.0–5.7) | 4.8 (4.0–5.2) | 0.231 |
| hs-CRP (mg/dL) | 1.3 (0.5–3.2) | 1.8 (1.0–4.2) | 0.028 |
| XO (μU/mL) | 63.5 (53.4–73.1) | 70.7 (58.1–84.6) | 0.009 |
| BMI > 25 kg/m2, | 77 (55.0) | 66 (75.9) | 0.001 |
Data shown as median and interquartile range (IQR). The comparison between the groups was carried out by the Mann–Whitney U test. p < 0.05 was considered significant. Abbreviations: body mass index (BMI), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), hemoglobin-A1C (A1C), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), homeostatic model assessment for Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β), hs-CRP (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein), xanthine oxidase (XO), type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Figure 1Xanthine oxidase (XO) activity in (A) patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) grouped according to body mass index (BMI). (B) non-T2D (No-T2D). Data shown as median and interquartile range (IQR). Comparison between groups analyzed by Mann–Whitney U test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Sex-based analyses of overweight T2D patients and non-T2D subjects.
| Parameter | Overweight Non-T2D (77) | Overweight T2D (66) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men ( | Women ( | Men ( | Women ( | |
| Age (years) | 41.0 (30.0–49.5) | 45.0 (39.0–54.0) | 58.5 (47.2–63.0) † | 57.0 (47.5–65.0) ‡ |
| FPG (mg/dL) | 95.0 (93.0–102.5) | 94.0 (87.0–103.0) | 179.5 (137.0–236.2) † | 168.0 (119.7–249.0) ‡ |
| A1C (%) | 5.2 (4.8–5.6) | 5.3 (5.0–5.6) | 7.5 (6.7–10.6) † | 7.5 (6.2–10.2) ‡ |
| FPI (mg/dL) | 10.1 (6.6–12.7) | 8.8 (6.2–13.5) | 8.5 (5.6–13.0) | 10.7 (7.7–15.2) |
| C-Peptide (mg/dL) | 2.3 (1.8–2.8) | 2.3 (1.7–3.1) | 3.0 (2.4–3.9) † | 2.7 (2.3–3.6) |
| HOMA-IR | 1.3 (0.9–1.6) | 1.2 (0.8–1.8) | 4.1 (2.2–6.6) † | 5.0 (2.6–8.1) ‡ |
| HOMA-β | 93.9 (73.9–123.6) | 98.8 (77.3–119.7) | 29.2 (14.9–54.4) † | 46.0 (15.7–72.2) ‡ |
| hs-CRP (mg/dL) | 1.5 (0.7–3.0) | 1.5 (0.5–4.1) | 1.3 (0.7–3.2) | 2.4 (1.5–4.5) § |
| Uric Acid (mg/dL) | 6.0 (5.0–6.1) | 4.3 (4.0–5.0) Ŧ | 5.0 (4.0–6.0) | 4.0 (3.9–5.0) § |
| XO activity (μU/mL) | 67.4 (44.8–87.8) | 66.5 (36.2–72.5) | 83.6 (67.5–94.8) | 71.1 (61.2–82.6) § |
Data shown as median and interquartile range (IQR). The comparison between the groups was carried out by the Kruskal–Wallis test adjusted with the Bonferroni correction for repeated samples. Abbreviations: fasting plasma glucose (FPG), hemoglobin-A1C (A1C), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), homeostatic model assessment for Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β), hs-CRP (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein), xanthine oxidase (XO), type 2 diabetes (T2D). § T2D Women vs. T2D Men. ‡ Non-T2D Women vs. T2D Women. † Non-T2D Men vs. T2D Men. Ŧ Non-T2D women vs. non-T2D men.
Figure 2Association between serum XO activity and HOMA-β in overweight women and men with and without T2D. (A) T2D. (B) Non-T2D. The p values were estimated form Spearman’s correlation analyses. p < 0.05 was considered significant. Abbreviations: Xanthine oxidase (XO), Homeostatic Model Assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β).
Figure 3Correlation between XO activity and FPG and hemoglobin-A1C levels in T2D and non-T2D subjects with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. (A) XO activity vs. FPG in T2D patients. (B) XO activity vs. A1C in T2D subjects. (C) XO activity vs. FPG in non-T2D. (D) XO activity vs. A1C in non-T2D subjects. The P values were estimated by Spearman’s correlation analyses. Abbreviations: Xanthine oxidase (XO), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), hemoglobin-A1C (A1C).