| Literature DB >> 36232247 |
Fang Liang1,2, Ju Hu1,2, Bing Liu3, Lin Li1, Xiuling Yang1, Caihong Bai1,2, Xiaohui Tan4.
Abstract
Mangrove plants play an important role in the remediation of heavy-metal-contaminated estuarine and coastal areas; Barringtonia racemosa is a typical semi-mangrove plant. However, the effect of heavy metal stress on this plant has not been explored. In this study, tolerance characteristics and the accumulation profile of cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) in B. racemosa were evaluated. The results indicated that B. racemosa exhibited a high tolerance in single Cd/Pb and Cd + Pb stress, with a significant increase in biomass yield in all treatment groups, a significant increase in plant height, leaf area, chlorophyll and carotenoid content in most treatment groups and without significant reduction of SOD, POD, MDA, proline content, Chl a, Chl b, Chl a + b, Car, ratio of Chl a:b and ratio of Car:Chl (a + b). Cd and Pb mainly accumulated in the root (≥93.43%) and the content of Cd and Pb in B. racemosa was root > stem > leaf. Pb showed antagonistic effects on the Cd accumulation in the roots and Cd showed antagonistic or synergistic effects on the Pb accumulation in the roots, which depended on the concentration of Cd and Pb. There was a significant synergistic effect of Cd and Pb enrichment under a low Cd and Pb concentration treatment. Thus, phytoremediation could potentially use B. racemosa for Cd and Pb.Entities:
Keywords: Barringtonia racemosa; absorption; cadmium and lead stress; tolerance
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36232247 PMCID: PMC9566725 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912947
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Treated concentrations of Cd and Pb.
| Treatments | Cd | Treatments | Pb | Treatments | Cd + Pb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0 | - | 0 | - | 0 + 0 |
| Cd1 | 50 | Pb1 | 500 | M1 | 50 + 500 |
| Cd2 | 100 | Pb2 | 1000 | M2 | 100 + 1000 |
| Cd3 | 150 | Pb3 | 1500 | M3 | 150 + 1500 |
| Cd4 | 200 | Pb4 | 2000 | M4 | 200 + 2000 |
Figure 1Effects of single Cd/Pb and Cd + Pb combined stress on growth indexes of B. racemosa seedlings. (A) Total increment of plant height (cm); (B) total increment of ground diameter (mm); (C) leaf area (cm2); (D) root area (cm2); (E) biomass (g DW); (F) root: shoot ratio (R/S). Means represent the average of three replicates (n = 3) ± SD, within each graph, mean values with common letters are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range tests.
Figure 2Effects of single Cd/Pb and Cd + Pb combined stress on leaf physiological indexes of B. racemosa seedlings. (A) Superoxide dismutase (SOD, U g−1 FW); (B) peroxidase activity (POD, U g−1 FW); (C) malondialdehyde content (MDA, µmol g−1 FW); (D) proline content (Pro, µmol g−1 FW). Means represent the average of three replicates (n = 3) ± SD, within each graph, mean values with common letters are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range tests.
Figure 3Photosynthetic pigments of B. racemosa under single Cd/Pb and Cd + Pb combined stress. (A) chlorophyll a (mg g−1 FW); (B) chlorophyll b (mg g−1 FW); (C) chlorophyll a + b (mg g−1 FW); (D) carotenoid (Car, mg g−1 FW); (E) chlorophyll a:b ratio; (F) Car:Chl (a + b) ratio. Means represent the average of three replicates (n = 3) ± SD, within each graph, mean values with common letters are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range tests.
Concentration and distribution of Cd in roots, stems and leaves of B. racemosa under single Cd/Pb and Cd + Pb stress.
| Treatment | Cd Concentration Mean ±SD (mg kg−1 DW) (Distribution (%)) | Cd Enrichment Coefficient | Cd Translocation Factors | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Root | Stem | Leaf | Total | |||
| CK | 0.50 ± 0.01 (74.57) g | 0.00 ± 0.00 (0.00) g | 0.17 ± 0.00 (25.43) c | 0.66 ± 0.01 g | 2.54 ± 0.00 b | 0.35 ± 0.02 a |
| Cd1 | 21.21 ± 0.53 (93.43) e | 1.37 ± 0.31 (6.06) a | 0.12 ± 0.00 (0.51) d | 22.70 ± 0.25 e | 2.51 ± 0.03 b | 0.07 ± 0.02 b |
| Cd2 | 28.93 ± 2.81 (98.22) d | 0.37 ± 0.01 (1.27) ef | 0.15 ± 0.01 (0.51) c | 29.46 ± 2.82 d | 1.66 ± 0.16 c | 0.02 ± 0.00 ef |
| Cd3 | 41.59 ± 0.41 (97.51) c | 0.81 ± 0.00 (1.90) b | 0.25 ± 0.01 (0.59) b | 42.66 ± 0.40 c | 1.41 ± 0.01 c | 0.03 ± 0.00 def |
| Cd4 | 98.56 ± 1.10 (98.66) a | 1.26 ± 0.00 (1.26) a | 0.08 ± 0.01 (0.08) e | 99.90 ± 1.10 a | 1.80 ± 0.02 c | 0.01 ± 0.00 f |
| M1 | 11.79 ± 0.09 (96.65) f | 0.31 ± 0.02 (2.52) f | 0.10 ± 0.03 (0.83) de | 12.20 ± 0.06 f | 28.58 ± 0.95 a | 0.03 ± 0.00 d |
| M2 | 12.04 ± 0.034 (95.23) f | 0.50 ± 0.00 (3.98) de | 0.10 ± 0.01 (0.79) de | 12.64 ± 0.05 f | 1.21 ± 0.01 c | 0.05 ± 0.00 c |
| M3 | 27.88 ± 0.07 (97.14) d | 0.70 ± 0.00 (2.44) bc | 0.12 ± 0.02 (0.43) d | 28.71 ± 0.07 d | 1.32 ± 0.00 c | 0.03 ± 0.00 de |
| M4 | 54.41 ± 0.02 (97.61) b | 0.62 ± 0.04 (1.11) cd | 0.72 ± 0.00 (1.29) a | 55.74 ± 0.02 b | 1.76 ± 0.01 c | 0.02 ± 0.00 def |
Different letters indicate significance of p < 0.05. Letters shared in common indicate no significant difference.
Concentration and distribution of Pb in roots, stems and leaves of B. racemosa under single Cd/Pb and Cd + Pb stress.
| Treatment | Pb Concentration (mg/kg) (Distribution (%)) | Pb Enrichment Coefficient | Pb Translocation Factors | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Root | Stem | Leaf | Total | |||
| CK | 1.10 ± 0.32 (61.44) g | 0.40 ± 0.17 (21.80) bc | 0.30 ± 0.05 (16.76) de | 1.80 ± 0.52 h | 0.47 ± 0.14 c | 0.63 ± 0.08 a |
| Pb1 | 22.78 ± 0.35 (95.20) f | 0.95 ± 0.09 (3.95) a | 0.20 ± 0.07 (0.85) e | 23.93 ± 0.31 g | 0.53 ± 0.01 c | 0.05 ± 0.01 b |
| Pb2 | 73.38 ± 0.39 (98.83) d | 0.39 ± 0.11 (0.52) bc | 0.48 ± 0.10 (0.18) bc | 74.25 ± 0.41 e | 0.69 ± 0.01 c | 0.01 ± 0.00 b |
| Pb3 | 207.61 ± 11.21 (99.66) a | 0.31 ± 0.09 (0.15) c | 0.38 ± 0.07 (0.18) bcde | 208.31 ± 11.15 a | 1.51 ± 0.08 b | 0.00 ± 0.00 b |
| Pb4 | 79.61 ± 2.84 (98.15) d | 0.98 ± 0.04 (1.20) a | 0.53 ± 0.18 (0.65) b | 81.11 ± 2.95 d | 0.40 ± 0.01 c | 0.02 ± 0.00 b |
| M1 | 52.42 ± 0.47 (97.65) e | 0.94 ± 0.16 (1.74) a | 0.33 ± 0.07 (0.61) cde | 53.68 ± 0.57 f | 11.63 ± 0.58 a | 0.02± 0.00 b |
| M2 | 21.97 ± 0.12 (95.99) f | 0.53 ± 0.04 (2.31) b | 0.39 ± 0.05 (1.70) bcd | 22.89 ± 0.14 g | 0.54 ± 0.00 c | 0.04± 0.00 b |
| M3 | 165.87 ± 0.70 (99.44) b | 0.48 ± 0.12 (0.29) bc | 0.45 ± 0.21 (0.27) bc | 166.81 ± 0.88 b | 1.53 ± 0.01 b | 0.01 ± 0.00 b |
| M4 | 127.61 ± 0.17 (99.06) c | 0.43 ± 0.13 (0.33) bc | 0.79 ± 0.03 (0.61) a | 128.82 ± 0.09 c | 1.24 ± 0.01 b | 0.01 ± 0.00 b |
Different letters indicate significance of p < 0.05. Letters shared in common indicate no significant difference.
Figure 4Models of absorption of Cd and Pb in B. racemosa under single Cd/Pb and Cd + Pb combined stress. (A) Cd absorption model under Cd stress; (B) Cd absorption model under Cd + Pb combined stress; (C) Pb absorption model under Pb stress; (D) Pb absorption model under Cd + Pb combined stress.