| Literature DB >> 36232054 |
Mª Genoveva Dancausa Millán1, Mª Genoveva Millán Vázquez de la Torre2.
Abstract
Traveling to learn about the gastronomy of a destination is becoming increasingly important among tourists, especially in the wake of the pandemic. Quality foods endorsed by protected designations of origin (PDOs) are increasingly in demand, as are experiences related to their production processes. In this study, the seven PDOs in the province of Córdoba (Spain) are analyzed. These PDOs produce olive oil, wine or ham. A field study was performed, whereby 315 gastronomic tourists who visited a gastronomic route or a PDO in Córdoba were surveyed. The objective was to characterize the profile of visiting tourists and to anticipate future demand using ARIMA models. The results indicate that the growth in gastronomic tourism in Córdoba is lower than that in the wider region, and that there are no significant differences among the different profiles (oil tourist, enotourist and ham tourists) due in part to the fact that most tourists travel from nearby regions. The novelty of this study is that three products are analyzed, and strategies are proposed to deseasonalize this type of tourism, for example, by creating a gastronomic brand that represents Córdoba and selling products under that brand (especially in international markets), by highlighting raw materials and prepared dishes and by making gastronomy a complement to heritage tourism in the city and rural tourism in the province.Entities:
Keywords: ARIMA; Córdoba; Iberian ham; food; gastronomic routes; gastronomic tourism; olive oil; wine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36232054 PMCID: PMC9566184 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912754
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Distribution of agri-food products, wines and spirits with PDOs and PGIs in Spain, Andalusia and Córdoba (July 2022).
| Agri-Food Products | PDO | PGI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spain | Andalusia | Córdoba | Spain | Andalusia | Córdoba | |
| Fresh meat (and offal) | - | - | - | 22 | 1 | - |
| Meat products | 5 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 2 | - |
| Cheese | 27 | - | - | 2 | - | - |
| Other animal products (honey) | 3 | 1 | - | 4 | - | - |
| Oils and fats (31 oils and 2 butters) | 30 | 12 | 4 | 3 | - | - |
| Fruits, vegetables and fresh and transformed cereals | 26 | 3 | - | 36 | 3 | - |
| Fish, seafood and fresh crustaceans and derived products | 1 | - | - | 4 | 4 | - |
| Other products (saffron, paprika, tiger nut, hazelnut, vinegar and cider) | 9 | 3 | 1 | - | - | - |
| Bakery, confectionary, pastry and dessert products | - | - | - | 16 | 4 | - |
| Cochineal | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total PDO and PGI of agri-food products | 102 | 21 | 6 | 98 | 14 | 0 |
| Wines with designation of origin (DO) | 74 | 7 | 1 | - | - | - |
| Wines with qualified design of origin (DO Ca) | 2 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Quality wines with geographical indication (QW) | 10 | 1 | - | - | - | - |
| Paid wines (PV) | 11 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Wines with geographical indication (GI) | - | - | - | 41 | 16 | 2 |
| Aromatized wines | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - |
| Total PDO and PGI of Wines | 97 | 8 | 1 | 42 | 17 | 2 |
| Spirits with PGI | - | - | - | 19 | 1 | - |
| Total PDO and PGI | 199 | 30 | 7 | 159 | 32 | 0 |
Source: Prepared by the authors based on information from the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment and the European Commission, Directorate General of Agriculture and Rural Development [16].
Figure 1Geographical location of PDOs in the province of Córdoba. Source: own elaboration.
Figure 2Pillars of gastronomic tourism in the province of Córdoba. Source: own elaboration.
Technical aspects of the survey.
| Demand Survey | |
|---|---|
| Population | Tourists of both sexes over 18 years old who visited a gastronomic route or PDO in Córdoba |
| Sample size | 315 |
| Sampling error | ±4.2% |
| Confidence level | 95%; |
| Sampling system | Simple random |
| Date of fieldwork | September 2021–January 2022 |
Profile of gastronomic tourists in Córdoba (%).
| Block | Question | Classification | Percentage of | Percentage of Enotourists | Percentage of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Personal characteristics of gastronomic tourists | Age | 18–29 years | 14.2 | 23.0 | 14.4 |
| 30–39 years | 27.1 | 28.4 | 27.3 | ||
| 40–49 years | 20.3 |
| 19.3 | ||
| 50–59 years |
| 13.2 |
| ||
| Over 60 years | 7.3 | 3.4 | 8.6 | ||
| Education level | No completed studies | 9.3 | 1.0 | 9.4 | |
| Primary and secondary studies | 19.6 | 32.9 | 18.6 | ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Higher studies | 27.4 | 26.0 | 33.5 | ||
| Gender |
|
|
|
| |
| Female | 42.5 | 49.8 | 41.8 | ||
| Marital status | Single | 26.9 | 35.0 | 26.9 | |
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Divorced/separated | 25.2 | 20.3 | 24.3 | ||
| Other | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.6 | ||
| Monthly income level of the family unit | Less than EUR 1000 | 19.8 | 23.9 | 19.8 | |
| EUR 1001–1500 | 19.8 |
| 20.0 | ||
| EUR 1501–2000 |
| 18.3 |
| ||
| EUR 2001–2500 | 20.0 | 7.4 | 20.0 | ||
| More than EUR 2500 | 10 | 2.8 | 10.2 | ||
| Who do you travel with? | Alone | 3.2 | 4.7 | 2.0 | |
|
|
|
|
| ||
| With friends | 37.7 | 32.3 | 38.4 | ||
| With relatives | 10.3 | 17.4 | 10.2 | ||
| Where are you from? |
|
|
|
| |
| Rest of Spain (except Andalusia) | 30.1 | 34.3 | 29.8 | ||
| European Union (except Spain) | 10.0 | 12.5 | 10.2 | ||
| United States | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | ||
| Rest of the world (except European Union) | 0.7 | 10 | 0.5 | ||
| Employment situation |
|
|
|
| |
| Self-employed | 10.2 | 8.5 | 10.2 | ||
| Retired | 17.4 | 7.4 | 17.3 | ||
| Unemployed | 8.3 | 3.4 | 8.1 | ||
| Student | 2.7 | 10.6 | 2.2 | ||
| Duration of the trip |
|
|
|
| |
| 1–3 days | 34.3 | 9.7 | 33.3 | ||
| More than 3 days | 12.0 | 7.1 | 12.5 | ||
| Daily expenditure | Less than EUR 30 | 11.2 | 11.9 | 11.1 | |
| EUR 30–65EUR 66–100 | 24.0 | 17.6 | 23.9 | ||
|
| 22.4 |
| |||
| More than EUR 100 | 22.7 |
| 21.1 |
Source: own elaboration. Bold indicates the highest value classification.
Univariate results of the survey of gastronomic tourism on Andalusia: questions about the visit.
| Block | Question | Classification | Percentage of Ham Tourists | Percentage of | Percentage of Oil Tourists |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Questions about the visit | Number of people who travelled the route with you | 1 person | 8.3 | 15.6 | 12.2 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
| More than 4 people | 15.5 | 14.3 | 21.6 | ||
| Has the PDO or the gastronomic route met your expectations? |
|
|
|
| |
| No | 15.8 | 20.8 | 19.4 | ||
| What would you improve? | Nothing | 0.3 | 1.3 | 0.9 | |
|
|
| 38.5 |
| ||
| Explanation of the route or the PDO | 24.8 |
| 39.1 | ||
| More audiovisual media | 18.3 | 15.9 | 11.7 | ||
| Other | 6 | 4.2 | 0.6 | ||
| Would you be interested in receiving more information after the visit? |
|
|
|
| |
| Yes, in any case | 17.5 | 6.2 | 20.2 | ||
| I do not think it’s necessary | 20.2 | 19.5 | 10.2 | ||
| Did you come expressly for this gastronomic route, or was it offered to you in Andalusia? |
|
|
|
| |
| It was circumstantial; they offered it to me | 23.9 | 40.3 | 51.6 | ||
| Does the price paid seem to be consistent with the route? |
|
|
|
| |
| No | 3.8 | 9.9 | 3.8 | ||
| How did you learn about the route? | Travel agencies | 5.2 | 14.6 | 13.9 | |
|
|
| 35.8 |
| ||
| On the recommendation of friends and family | 31.3 |
| 32.2 | ||
| Other media | 2.1 | 3.9 | 5.8 | ||
| I would repeat the experience using a similar route |
|
|
|
| |
| No | 17.7 | 12.8 | 3.4 | ||
| Degree of satisfaction with the visit | Less than 25% | 6.0 | 4.4 | 0.6 | |
| 25–50% | 4.2 | 7.9 | 1.1 | ||
| 51–75% | 8.3 | 5.4 | 2.7 | ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 100% | 20.1 | 18.1 | 38.6 |
Source: own elaboration Bold indicates the highest value classification.
Univariate results of the survey of gastronomic tourists: motivations.
| Block | Question | Classification | Percentage of | Percentage of | Percentage of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Questions about the motivation for the visit | What were the reasons for the visit? | Learn the culinary tradition of the destination | 40.2 | 31 | 39.6 |
| Learn the process of making oil/wine/ham and visit oil mills, ham curing facilities, wineries |
|
|
| ||
| Attend gastronomic festivals | 9.3 | 3.2 | 10.1 | ||
| How do you rate the current situation in terms of tourism management at sites like the ones you have visited? | Good |
| 39.4 |
| |
| Fine | 29.1 |
| 27.9 | ||
| Bad | 21.6 | 7.8 | 20.5 | ||
| What would you think about the creation of a combined route of various gastronomic products with theatrical performances? | I agree |
|
|
| |
| I do not agree; I prefer to visit a single gastronomic route and not several | 1.9 | 0.7 | 3.5 |
Source: own elaboration. Bold indicates the highest value classification
Figure 3Relationship map. Source: own elaboration.
Bivariate analysis.
| Associated Variables | χ2 | df | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age/Motivation for engaging in gastronomic tourism | 325.71 | 8 | <0.001 |
| Satisfaction with visit/gender | 11.86 | 4 | 0.019 |
| Satisfaction/self-classification regarding gastronomy | 62.32 | 16 | <0.001 |
| Satisfaction/Place of origin | 241.47 | 16 | <0.001 |
| Satisfaction/Education level | 264.89 | 12 | <0.001 |
χ2 Chi-square statistic. Related variables, α = 0.05; df = degrees of freedom.
Figure 4Monthly evolution of the number of gastronomic tourists in Córdoba (January 2015 to June 2022). Source: own elaboration based on information from the Designations of Origin of Córdoba. Vertical axis is thousands of people.
Estimation of the SARIMA model.
| Variable | Coefficient | Std. Error | t-Statistic | Prob. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR (1) | −0.497661 | 0.101278 | −4.913816 | 0.0000 |
| SMA (12) | −0.942206 | 0.062879 | −14.98443 | 0.0000 |
Significant parameters α = 0.05.
GARCH test.
| Variable | Coefficient | Std. Error | z-Statistic | Prob. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variance Equation | ||||
| C | 1.14 × 10−4 | 2.47 × 10−5 | 4.620412 | 0.0000 |
| RESID (−1)^2 | 13.83276 | 0.962786 | 14.36743 | 0.0000 |
| GARCH (−1) | 0.114353 | 0.012500 | 9.147971 | 0.0000 |
Absence of autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity. Dependent variable: TOURIST. 1. Method: ML—ARCH (Marquardt)—Normal distribution. GARCH = C(1) + C(2) * RESID(−1)^2 + C(3) * GARCH(−1).
Figure 5Monthly evolution of the number of gastronomic tourists in Córdoba and estimation errors (January 2015 to June 2022). Source: own elaboration based on ARIMA model estimate.
Differences in tourist numbers before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in Córdoba.
| Year/Month | Tourists | Year/Month | Tourists | Difference | % Variation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022/07 | 28,110 | 2019/07 | 27,590 | 520 | 1.88 |
| 2022/08 | 22,345 | 2019/08 | 20,140 | 2205 | 10.94 |
| 2022/09 | 17,524 | 2019/09 | 16,130 | 1394 | 8.64 |
| 2022/10 | 18,132 | 2019/10 | 16,240 | 1892 | 11.65 |
| 2022/11 | 15,625 | 2019/11 | 13,830 | 1795 | 12.97 |
| 2022/12 | 22,736 | 2019/12 | 16,560 | 6176 | 37.29 |
| total | 124,472 | 110,490 | 13,982 | 12.65 |
Source: by authors. Column %Variation = tourists year 2022/tourists year 2019.
Figure 6Classification of the gastronomic tourist according to product. Source: own elaboration.