| Literature DB >> 36231923 |
Suli Cheng1, Zubing Xiang2, Haojun Xi2.
Abstract
In recent years, there have been growing concerns about the environment and its effect on human health. In this paper, we measure human health by mortality. Firstly, we use the method of deviation decomposition to investigate the different changes of mortality in eastern, central and western regions of China. Secondly, we study the linearity and nonlinearity between environmental status and mortality by semi-parametric additive panel model. Following is the primary conclusions obtained in the study: (1) There exists a big mortality gap among different regions; the gap is mainly dominated by the inter-regional difference; the mortality of the middle region increases heavily; the western region becomes a major source of mortality differences. (2) Mortality decreased with the increase of urban green area. On the other hand, the higher the environmental pollution index, the higher the mortality rate. (3) The environmental pollution index, urban green area, number of licensed (assistant) physicians per thousand and the per capita GDP can affect mortality in a nonlinear way.Entities:
Keywords: deviation decomposition; environmental status; mortality; semi-parametric additive panel model
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36231923 PMCID: PMC9566106 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912623
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Mortality levels and differences of nation and each region (unit: ‰).
| Nation | Eastern Region | Central Region | Western Region | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 2011 | 5.84 | 0.76 | 5.65 | −0.20 | 6.05 | 0.20 | 5.89 | 0.05 |
| 2012 | 5.97 | 0.79 | 5.85 | −0.12 | 6.17 | 0.20 | 5.95 | −0.02 |
| 2013 | 5.98 | 0.74 | 5.84 | −0.15 | 6.11 | 0.13 | 6.03 | 0.05 |
| 2014 | 6.11 | 0.73 | 5.90 | −0.21 | 6.45 | 0.34 | 6.08 | −0.03 |
| 2015 | 5.98 | 0.80 | 5.78 | −0.19 | 6.20 | 0.22 | 6.01 | 0.03 |
| 2016 | 6.07 | 0.83 | 5.92 | −0.15 | 6.37 | 0.30 | 6.00 | −0.06 |
| 2017 | 6.14 | 0.84 | 5.99 | −0.15 | 6.45 | 0.31 | 6.08 | −0.07 |
| 2018 | 6.17 | 0.81 | 6.07 | −0.11 | 6.39 | 0.22 | 6.12 | −0.05 |
| 2019 | 6.21 | 0.86 | 6.04 | −0.17 | 6.60 | 0.39 | 6.11 | −0.10 |
Contribution degree of each regional mortality differences on national total differences (unit: %).
| Contribution Degree of Differences within the Region | Contribution Degree of | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eastern Region | Central Region | Western Region | Total | ||
| 2011 | 44.30 | 8.25 | 42.87 | 95.42 | 4.58 |
| 2012 | 40.69 | 9.58 | 47.19 | 97.46 | 2.54 |
| 2013 | 39.21 | 15.88 | 42.5 | 97.59 | 2.41 |
| 2014 | 34.07 | 8.99 | 47.89 | 90.95 | 9.05 |
| 2015 | 33.94 | 12.27 | 49.58 | 95.78 | 4.22 |
| 2016 | 36.02 | 13.98 | 45.09 | 95.09 | 4.91 |
| 2017 | 40.02 | 11.49 | 43.47 | 94.98 | 5.02 |
| 2018 | 39.03 | 12.97 | 45.21 | 97.20 | 2.8 |
| 2019 | 38.16 | 9.23 | 45.25 | 92.65 | 7.35 |
The results of Hausman test.
|
| df | |
|---|---|---|
| 82.78 | 4 | <2.2 × |
The linear effect result of environmental status on mortality.
| Variable | Estimation | Std | t-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 0.1014 *** | 0.0260 | 3.900 | <0.0001 |
| polu | 0.4293 ** | 0.1312 | 3.271 | 0.0012 |
| Log(greenland) | −0.5756 ** | 0.1938 | −2.971 | 0.0033 |
| doctor | 0.0838 | 0.0540 | 1.553 | 0.1216 |
| Log(pgdp) | 1.0987 *** | 0.1956 | 5.617 | <0.0001 |
** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
The nonlinear effect result of environmental status on mortality.
| Variable | edf | Ref.df | t-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S (polu) | 8.3338 *** | 8.8515 | 5.324 | <0.0001 |
| S (Log(greenland)) | 8.0546 *** | 8.5740 | 10.549 | <0.0001 |
| S (doctor) | 0.7325 *** | 0.7325 | 55.998 | <0.0001 |
| S (Log(pgdp)) | 8.2432 *** | 8.7898 | 11.239 | <0.0001 |
*** p < 0.001.
The linear effect result of environmental status on mortality.
| Variable | Estimation | Std | t-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 0.1026 *** | 0.0267 | 3.840 | <0.0001 |
| polu | 0.4308 ** | 0.1314 | 3.280 | 0.0012 |
| Log(greenland) | −0.5685 ** | 0.1929 | −2.947 | 0.0035 |
| Log(pgdp) | 1.1096 *** | 0.1965 | 5.646 | <0.0001 |
** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
The nonlinear effect result of environmental status on mortality.
| Variable | edf | Ref.df | t-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S (polu) | 8.334 *** | 8.851 | 5.319 | <0.0001 |
| S (Log(greenland)) | 8.059 *** | 8.578 | 10.538 | <0.0001 |
| S (doctor) | 1.000 *** | 1.000 | 15.628 | <0.0001 |
| S (Log(pgdp)) | 8.245 *** | 8.792 | 11.249 | <0.0001 |
*** p < 0.001.
Figure 1The nonlinear effect of environmental status on mortality.