| Literature DB >> 36231461 |
Jieun Jung1, Hyeonsuk Jin2, Seungmi Seo2, Myeongin Jeong2, Boeun Kim2, Kyoungyul Ryu2, Kwangkyo Oh2.
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the enterotoxin profiles and antibiotic susceptibility of Bacillus cereus isolated from garlic chives and environmental samples. A total of 103 B. cereus isolates were used to identify enterotoxin genes, including hblA, hblC, hblD, nheA, nheB, and nheC. The hemolysin BL enterotoxin complex (hblACD) was detected in 38 isolates (36.9%), and the non-hemolytic enterotoxin complex (nheABC) was detected in 8 (7.8%) isolates. Forty-five isolates (43.7%) had hblACD and nheABC genes. B. cereus was resistant to β-lactam antibiotics and susceptible to non-β-lactam antibiotics. However, some B. cereus strains showed intermediate resistance to β-lactam and non-β-lactam antibiotics. B. cereus isolated from garlic chives showed intermediate resistance to cefotaxime (7.7%), rifampin (15.4%), clindamycin (30.8%), erythromycin (7.7%), and tetracycline (7.7%). B. cereus isolates from the agricultural environment were moderately resistant to cefotaxime (18.9%), rifampin (15.6%), clindamycin (12.2%), erythromycin (4.4%), and tetracycline (5.6%). Moreover, B. cereus isolates from garlic chives and cultivation environments could change their antibiotic resistance profile from susceptible to intermediate-resistant to rifampin, clindamycin, erythromycin, and tetracycline and exhibit multidrug resistance. These results indicate that continuous monitoring of B. cereus contamination in the produce and agricultural environment might be needed to ensure the safety of consuming fresh vegetables.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus cereus; agricultural environment; antibiotic resistance; enterotoxin; garlic chive
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36231461 PMCID: PMC9564537 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912159
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
B. cereus isolated from garlic chives and environment had diverse patterns of enterotoxin genes distributions.
| Sample | No. of Isolates (%) | Toxin Genes | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pattern |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Garlic chives | 3/13 (23.1) | G1 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 8/13 (61.5) | G2 | + | + | + | + | — | + | + | — | |
| 1/13 (7.7) | G3 | + | — | + | — | + | + | + | + | |
| 1/13 (7.7) | G4 | — | + | + | — | + | + | + | + | |
| Soil | 32/67 (47.8) | S1 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 7/67 (10.4) | S2 | + | + | + | + | + | — | + | — | |
| 3/67 (4.5) | S3 | + | + | + | + | + | — | — | — | |
| 12/67 (17.9) | S4 | + | + | + | + | — | + | + | — | |
| 5/67 (7.5) | S5 | + | — | + | — | + | + | + | + | |
| 1/67 (1.5) | S6 | + | — | + | — | + | + | — | — | |
| 2/67 (3.0) | S7 | + | — | + | — | — | + | + | — | |
| 1/67 (1.5) | S8 | — | + | + | — | + | + | + | + | |
| 2/67 (3.0) | S9 | — | + | + | — | + | — | + | — | |
| 1/67 (1.5) | S10 | — | + | + | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 1/67 (1.5) | S11 | — | — | + | — | + | — | + | — | |
| Compost | 4/17 (23.5) | C1 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 8/17 (47.1) | C2 | + | + | + | + | — | + | + | — | |
| 1/17 (5.9) | C3 | + | — | + | — | + | — | — | — | |
| 1/17 (5.9) | C4 | — | + | + | — | + | — | + | — | |
| 2/17 (11.8) | C5 | — | — | — | — | + | — | + | — | |
| 1/17 (5.9) | C6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | + | — | |
| Irrigation water | 6/6 (100.0) | W1 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
1 hblACD, hblA + hblC + hblD. 2 nheABC, nheA + nheB + nheC.
Figure 1Antibiotic susceptibility of B. cereus isolated from garlic chives (a), soil (b), compost (c), and irrigation water (d) was determined by disk diffusion method. P, penicillin; OX, oxacillin; CTX, cefotaxime; FOX, cefoxitin; IPM, imipenem; CN, gentamicin; S, streptomycin; RD, rifampin; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; VA, vancomycin; DA, clindamycin; E, erythromycin; LZD, linezolid; C, chloramphenicol; TE, tetracycline; CIP, ciprofloxacin.