| Literature DB >> 36231158 |
Anna Mazur1, Elżbieta Bartoń2.
Abstract
Since the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is a serious crisis in many countries around the world, it is important to conduct empirical research aimed at identifying risks and factors protecting the functioning of people affected by it. For this reason, the goals of the present research were to determine the level of physical activity and the severity of symptoms characteristic of mental disorders, cognitive disorders and the quality of social functioning, as well as the structure of the relationship between physical activity and psychosocial functioning of 226 women and 226 men during the COVID-19 epidemic in Eastern Poland. The research was conducted using the IPAQ-SF Questionnaire, GHQ-28 Questionnaires, TUS Test-6/9 version, the original SFS Scale and a self-developed sociodemographic survey. The collected data indicate that women as compared to men show lower levels of weekly physical activity, walking, moderate activity, vigorous activity and quality of functioning in family relationships, but higher severity of mental health disorders, somatic symptoms, functional disorders, depressive symptoms, cognitive disorders, perceptual work disorders, attention deficits and higher quality of functioning in work relationships. On the other hand, the structural model indicates that physical activity, interacting with mental health disorders and cognitive disorders, is positively associated with the social functioning of the respondents, and gender is the moderator of the occurring dependencies. This suggests that physical activity adapted to the condition of health may be an important component of gender-individualized psychopreventive interventions.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19 epidemic; gender; physical activity; psychosocial functioning
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36231158 PMCID: PMC9565899 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191911860
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Sociodemographic characteristics of the surveyed women and men.
| Variables | Group | Group Comparison | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women | Men | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Age | 46.79 | 11.92 | 46.35 | 11.48 | 0.40 | 0.691 | |
| Number of children | 2.39 | 1.02 | 2.22 | 1.12 | 1.71 | 0.09 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Place of residence | City | 113 | 50.0 | 113 | 50.0 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Village | 113 | 50.0 | 113 | 50.0 | |||
| Education | Primary | 27 | 11.9 | 37 | 16.4 | 5.29 | 0.152 |
| Vocational | 81 | 35.9 | 72 | 31.9 | |||
| Secondary | 78 | 34.5 | 64 | 28.3 | |||
| Higher | 40 | 17.7 | 53 | 23.4 | |||
| Marital status | Married | 113 | 50.0 | 113 | 50.0 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Informal relationship | 113 | 50.0 | 113 | 50.0 | |||
| Professional activity | Employment contract | 113 | 50.0 | 113 | 50.0 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Contract of mandate | 113 | 50.0 | 113 | 50.0 | |||
Markings: M—mean, SD—standard deviation, t—value of Student’s t-test for independent data, p—significance level.
Comparison of physical activity levels of women and men.
| Variable | Group | Group Comparison | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women | Men | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| High | 34 | 15.0 | 174 | 76.9 | 156.53 | 0.001 | 0.59 | |
| Physical activity * | Sufficient | 161 | 71.3 | 39 | 17.3 | |||
| Insufficient | 31 | 13.7 | 13 | 5.8 | ||||
Markings: n—count, %—percent, x2—c2 test value, p—significance level, V—effect size expressed by Crammer’s V coefficient, *—levels of weekly physical activity were distinguished based on results expressed in MET units.
Comparison of physical activity, mental health, cognitive processes and social functioning of women and men.
| Variables | Group | Group Comparison | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women | Men | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Weekly activity | 840.31 | 1013.04 | 1593.92 | 1244.42 | 5.97 | 0.001 | 0.56 | |
| Physical activity * | Walking | 396.59 | 642.54 | 583.49 | 821.69 | 2.30 | 0.022 | 0.22 |
| Moderate activity | 159.33 | 262.53 | 561.97 | 541.13 | 8.73 | 0.001 | 0.82 | |
| Vigorous activity | 285.39 | 381.90 | 448.45 | 591.34 | 2.98 | 0.003 | 0.28 | |
| Sitting, lying down | 228.88 | 101.39 | 209.01 | 87.94 | 1.85 | 0.66 | - | |
| Overall Score | 10.70 | 6.01 | 7.47 | 7.12 | 5.17 | 0.001 | 0.49 | |
| Mental health disorders ** | Somatic symptoms | 3.16 | 1.95 | 1.88 | 2.41 | 6.20 | 0.001 | 0.58 |
| Anxiety and insomnia | 2.79 | 2.63 | 2.45 | 2.79 | 1.73 | 0.084 | - | |
| Functional disorders | 2.26 | 2.55 | 1.39 | 2.50 | 3.68 | 0.001 | 0.35 | |
| Depressive symptoms | 2.48 | 1.61 | 1.86 | 1.96 | 3.65 | 0.001 | 0.34 | |
| Cognitive functioning | 6.28 | 0.79 | 5.78 | 1.10 | 5.67 | 0.001 | 0.53 | |
| Cognitive disorders *** | Perceptual work | 6.70 | 1.20 | 5.90 | 1.49 | 6.28 | 0.001 | 0.59 |
| Perception deficits | 6.23 | 1.33 | 6.38 | 1.54 | 1.04 | 0.298 | - | |
| Attention deficits | 5.92 | 1.35 | 5.05 | 1.61 | 6.15 | 0.001 | 0.58 | |
| Overall Score | 4.93 | 1.71 | 4.70 | 1.41 | 1.24 | 0.215 | - | |
| Social functioning *** | Family relationships | 4.77 | 1.85 | 5.70 | 1.73 | 4.98 | 0.001 | 0.47 |
| Interpersonal relationships | 4.74 | 1.79 | 4.87 | 1.95 | 0.65 | 0.514 | - | |
| Professional relationships | 4.32 | 2.64 | 3.04 | 2.29 | 5.56 | 0.001 | 0.52 | |
Markings: M—mean, SD—standard deviation, t—value of Student’s t-test for independent data, p—significance level, d—measure of Cohen’s d effect size, *—results expressed in MET units, **—raw results, ***—results expressed in sten.
Figure 1Standardized effects of the model of physical activity measurement in the group of women.
Figure 2Standardized effects of the model of physical activity measurement in the group of men.
Figure 3Standardized effects of the mental health disorder measurement model in the group of women.
Figure 4Standardized effects of the mental health disorder measurement model in the group of men.
Figure 5Standardized effects of the measurement model of cognitive disorders in the group of women.
Figure 6Standardized effects of the measurement model of cognitive disorders in the group of men.
Figure 7Standardized effects of the measurement model of social functioning in the group of women.
Figure 8Standardized effects of the measurement model of social functioning in the group of men.
Figure 9Standardized effects of the structural model of the relationship between physical activity and psychosocial functioning in a group of women.
Figure 10Standardized effects of the structural model of the relationship between physical activity and psychosocial functioning in a group of men.