| Literature DB >> 36230384 |
Stanislav Rimaso Kurpe1,2, Irina Viktorovna Sukhovskaya1,3, Ekaterina Vitalyevna Borvinskaya4, Alexey Anatolievich Morozov5, Aleksey Nikolaevich Parshukov3, Irina Evgenyevna Malysheva1,3, Alina Valeryevna Vasileva1, Natalia Alexandrovna Chechkova1, Tamara Yurevna Kuchko1.
Abstract
This article describes the clinical manifestation of natural Vibrio anguillarum infection in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) during an outbreak on a fish farm. (i) Using an integrated approach, we characterized the pathogenesis of vibriosis from the morphological, hematological, and biochemical points of view. The molecular mechanisms associated with the host immune response were investigated using mass spectrometric analysis of trout plasma proteins. (ii) According to the severity of infection (the extent of tissue damage, the level of expression of pro-inflammatory genes, and changes in the leukocyte profile) three fish populations were identified among infected trout: fish with severe lesions (SL), fish with the moderate infectious process (IP) and asymptomatic fish (AS). (iii) Lymphopenia, granulocytosis, and splenomegaly were strong trends during the progression of infection and informative indicators of severe manifestation of disease, associated with hemorrhagic shock, metabolic acidosis, and massive tissue damage. (iv) As expected, pro-inflammatory interleukins, complement components, acute phase proteins, and antimicrobial peptides were implicated in the acute pathogenesis. Systemic coagulopathy was accompanied by increased antithrombotic reactions. (v) Reconstruction of metabolic pathways also revealed a high energy requirement for the immune response in severely affected fish. (vi) An unexpected result was a small difference between fish with moderate symptoms and fish with no or minor external signs of pathology (putatively resistant to infection). Increased production of antiproteases and enhanced blood coagulation cascade were observed in healthier fish, which may underlie the mechanisms of a controlled, non-self-damaging immune response to infection. (vii) Depending on the progression of the disease and the presence of the pathogen, a stepwise or linear change in the abundance of some plasma proteins was revealed. These proteins could be proposed as molecular markers for diagnosing the health and immune status of trout when cultured in fish farms.Entities:
Keywords: Vibrio anguillarum; aquaculture; infection; plasma proteomics; rainbow trout; stress response; vibriosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 36230384 PMCID: PMC9559680 DOI: 10.3390/ani12192642
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Figure 1Representative anomalies of rainbow trout collected from a fish farm during a vibriosis outbreak with varying degrees of infection. (A)—asymptomatic fish with insignificant signs of disease on the skin and fins (AS group). (B)—dissection of asymptomatic fish with no hemorrhages in the body cavity (AS group). (C)—fish with “red marks” on the skin (white arrows) indicating infection (IP group). (D)—local hemorrhages (white arrow) in the liver of an infected trout (IP group). (E)—blisters (black arrow) and complete eye loss (white arrow) in fish with severe skin lesions and ulcers (SL group). (F)—hemorrhagic foci (white arrow) in the liver of severely affected fish (SL group).
Figure 2Assessment of the physiological state of rainbow trout collected on the farm during an outbreak of vibriosis (AS—asymptomatic, IP—with infectious process, SL—with severe lesions). (A)—principal component analysis of the measured parameters of the physiological state of trout. Samples are colored by fish group; marker size corresponds to the IPS value. Samples not included in the proteomic analysis were denoted as “discarded”. (B)—Spearman correlation matrix of morphophysiological parameters and biomarkers of immune response in collected rainbow trout. Only significant correlations are shown. (C)—morphometric parameters of trout from groups with different severity of the infectious disease. (D)—expression of immune-related genes in the spleen of trout from groups with different severity of the infectious disease. (E)—relative numbers of white blood cells in trout from groups with different severity of the infectious disease. (F)—types of leukocytes in the blood of trout from groups with different severity of the infectious disease. a—designates statistically significant difference from the AS group, b—designates statistically significant difference from the IP group (Wilcoxon’s two-sample test, p < 0.05).
Figure 3Composition of bacterial communities in rainbow trout and water collected in the fish farm during a vibriosis outbreak (AS—asymptomatic, IP—with infectious process, SL—with severe lesions). (A)—composition of the spleen OTUs. (B)—OTU composition of skin lesions (if the fish had any). (C)—composition of OTUs of water on the farm. OTUs are colored by genus.
Figure 4Changes in the protein composition of trout plasma in rainbow trout collected in the fish farm during an outbreak of vibriosis (AS—asymptomatic, IP—with infectious process, SL—with severe lesions). (A)—Venn diagram depicts overlapping and unique differentially expressed proteins between groups of fish. (B)—comparison of differentially expressed proteins between fish groups. (C)—heatmap of LFQ of trout proteins, the abundance of which was differentially expressed between groups.