| Literature DB >> 36230278 |
Xiaoyi Liu1, Lili Jiang1, Jiaman Pang1, Yujun Wu1, Yu Pi1, Jianjun Zang1, Junjun Wang1, Dandan Han1.
Abstract
Sows usually suffer oxidative stress during gestation, and this limits the growth of fetuses via placenta. Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is a functional nonessential amino acid engaged in regulating the physiological status of animals. However, the effects of GABA on the oxidative homeostasis of sows and their offspring remain unclear. Eighteen late gestating sows (85 d) were divided into the CON and GABA groups and fed the basal diet and the GABA diet (200 mg/kg GABA), respectively, until farrowing. At parturition, the sows' litter characteristics, the plasma antioxidant parameters of sows, and their offspring were evaluated. The results showed that GABA supplementation had no marked effect on the reproductive performance of sows (p > 0.10) but had a trend of reducing the amount of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in piglets (0.05 < p < 0.10). At the same time, the addition of GABA elevated the plasma superoxide dismutase (SOD) level of sows and enhanced the glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity of newborn piglets (p < 0.05). Based on the H2O2-induced oxidative stress in pTr-2 cells, GABA elevated intracellular GSH-Px, SOD, catalase (CAT), and total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC, p < 0.01) and upregulated the gene expressions of CAT, gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor (GABRP), and nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor-2 (Nrf2) in H2O2-treated pTr-2 cells (p < 0.05). Taken together, GABA improved the antioxidant capacity of sows and alleviated the placental oxidative stress by upregulating the GABRP and Nrf2 genes, which have the potential to promote oxidative homeostasis in newborn piglets.Entities:
Keywords: gamma-aminobutyric acid; gestating sows; newborn piglets; oxidative stress; pTr-2 cell
Year: 2022 PMID: 36230278 PMCID: PMC9558543 DOI: 10.3390/ani12192539
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Composition and nutrient levels of basal diet (%, as-fed basis).
| Items | CON |
|---|---|
| Corn | 60.00 |
| Wheat bran | 16.00 |
| Soybean meal | 19.00 |
| Soybean oil | 1.00 |
| Premix 1 | 4.00 |
| Nutrient levels 2 | |
| DM | 90.41 |
| DE (MJ/kg) | 3159 |
| CP | 15.97 |
| EE | 2.36 |
| Calcium | 0.83 |
| Total phosphorus | 0.47 |
| L-Lysine | 0.86 |
| L-Methionine | 0.23 |
| L-Tryptophan | 0.18 |
| L-Threonine | 0.59 |
| NDF | 18.15 |
| ADF | 5.09 |
1 Premix provided the following per kg of feed: vitamin A, 240–300 KIU; vitamin D3, 50–125 KIU; vitamin E, 500 IU; vitamin K3, 45 mg; vitamin B1, 50 mg; vitamin B2, 150 mg; vitamin B6, 100 mg; vitamin B12, 0.5 mg; pantothenic acid, 450 mg; niacin, 650 mg; folic acid, 80 mg; biotin, 10 mg; Fe, 2.4–18 g; Cu, 0.2–0. 8 g; I, 10–50 mg; Zn, 1.5–3.6 g; Se, 5–12.5 mg; Ca, 100–250 g; P, 20 g; NaCl, 60–220 g; choline chloride, 10 g; 2 DM, dry matter; DE, digestive energy; CP, crude protein; EE, ether extract; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber.
Primer sequences for RT-qPCR.
| Genes | Sequences 5′-3′ | Tm, °C |
|---|---|---|
|
| F: GAAAGCCCAGTCTTCATTGC | 52 |
|
| F: ACCTGGGCAATGTGACTG | 52 |
|
| F: AACTGTCCCTTCCGTGCTA | 52 |
|
| F: CGGATCAGCGGCTAGTGTT | 55 |
Effects of GABA supplementation during late gestation on litter characteristics for the sows.
| Items | CON | GABA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total piglets ( | 12.50 ± 1.30 | 12.63 ± 0.59 | 0.93 |
| Live piglets ( | 11.75 ± 1.29 | 12.13 ± 0.44 | 0.78 |
| Stillborn ( | 0.75 ± 0.31 | 0.50 ± 0.26 | 0.55 |
| Total litter weight (live, kg) | 16.06 ± 1.83 | 18.79 ± 1.06 | 0.22 |
| Average birth weight (live, kg) | 1.38 ± 0.07 | 1.57 ± 0.10 | 0.14 |
| IUGR piglets a ( | 1.00 ±0.38 | 0.25 ±0.16 | 0.09 |
CON = control group fed basal diet, GABA = GABA group fed basal diet plus GABA. n = 9 per treatment. a Intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) piglets = piglets with birth weight two standard deviations below the mean birth weight of the population [20]. Values are means ± SEM and analyzed by Student’s t-test.
Effects of maternal supplementation with GABA during late gestation on plasma biochemical parameters of sows and piglets.
| Items | CON | CON(CV) | GABA | GABA(CV) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sows | |||||
| CAT (U/mL) | 19.42 ± 1.91 | 0.2944 | 19.67 ± 1.50 | 0.2294 | 0.92 |
| GSH-Px (U/mL) | 696.70 ± 59.54 | 0.2564 | 582.70 ± 58.91 | 0.3033 | 0.19 |
| SOD (U/mL) | 62.32 ± 2.84 | 0.1368 | 72.42 ± 2.57 | 0.1064 | 0.02 |
| MDA (nmol/L) | 7.20 ± 0.38 | 0.1474 | 6.61 ±0.43 | 0.1828 | 0.32 |
| Piglets | |||||
| CAT (U/mL) | 19.42 ± 1.94 | 0.2450 | 21.30 ± 1.51 | 0.1737 | 0.46 |
| GSH-Px (U/mL) | 663.90 ± 21.85 | 0.0806 | 779.80 ± 44.00 | 0.1382 | 0.04 |
| SOD (U/mL) | 64.98 ± 3.56 | 0.1344 | 69.90 ± 3.98 | 0.1394 | 0.38 |
| MDA (nmol/L) | 7.56 ± 0.58 | 0.1882 | 7.48 ± 0.55 | 0.1788 | 0.93 |
CAT, catalase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; MDA, malondialdehyde; CV, coefficient of variance. CON = control group fed the basal diet, GABA = group fed the basal diet plus GABA. Values are means ± SEM and analyzed by Student’s t-test, n = 9, sows; n = 6, piglets.
Figure 1The effects of GABA on H2O2-induced cell viability of pTr-2 cells. CCK-8 method to detect cell viability. All data are presented as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA. ### p < 0.001, compared with CON cells; ** p < 0.01, compared with H2O2-treated cells without GABA pretreatment. n = 6.
Figure 2The effects of GABA on H2O2-induced antioxidant enzyme activity of pTr-2 cells. The enzyme activity of CAT (a), GSH-Px (b), SOD (c), and T-AOC (d). CAT, catalase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity. All data are presented as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA. # p < 0.05, ### p < 0.001, compared with CON cells; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, compared with H2O2-treated cells without GABA pretreatment. n = 4.
Figure 3The effects of GABA on H2O2-induced gene expression of pTr-2 cells. The relative mRNA expression of CAT (a), SOD-1 (b), Nrf2 (c), and GABRP (d). CAT, catalase; SOD-1, Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase; Nrf2, nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor-2; GABRP, GABAA-pi. All data are presented as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA. # p < 0.05, compared with CON cells; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, compared with H2O2-treated cells without GABA pretreatment. n = 4.