| Literature DB >> 36230160 |
Xuedong Yao1,2,3, Yongzhen Zang1,2,3, Jiangwei Gu1,2,3, Haiyang Ding1,2,3, Yubao Niu1,2,3, Xia Zheng1,2,3, Rongguang Zhu1,2,3, Qiang Wang1,2,3.
Abstract
Jujubes have been favored by consumers because of their rich nutrition and wide use. Hot air drying has been commercially and typically used to prolong shelf life and acquire the dried produce. Jujube slices were dried with hot air combined with radio frequency (RF) at different drying stages, namely, early (0-2 h, E-HA + RF), middle (2-4 h, M-HA + RF), later (4-6 h, L-HA + RF), and whole (0-6 h, W-HA + RF) stages. This study aimed to investigate the effects of different RF application stages on the microstructure, moisture absorption rate, color, and ascorbic acid of jujube slices. Compared with the hot air drying (HA) group, the E-HA + RF group obtained the best results among the experimental groups because it reduced the cells with a roundness of less than 0.4 by 5%. Moreover, the M-HA + RF group showed better results than those of other groups, with an 18.6% and 48.8% reduction in cells for a cross-sectional area less than 200 µm2 and a perimeter less than 25 µm, respectively. The minimum total color difference (ΔE = 9.21 ± 0.31) and maximum retention of ascorbic acid (285.06 mg/100 g) were also observed in this group. Therefore, the method of hot air drying assisted by phased RF is viable in the drying industry to improve the quality of dried agricultural products and reduce energy consumption.Entities:
Keywords: drying; food processing; jujube slices; microstructure; radio frequency
Year: 2022 PMID: 36230160 PMCID: PMC9562017 DOI: 10.3390/foods11193086
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1RF–hot air combined drying system.
Figure 2Position of the material tray.
Figure 3Image process of dried jujube slices ((a): main menu; (b): scale setting; (c): threshold setting; (d): particle analysis; (e): results).
Figure 4Moisture absorption rate detection principle of dried jujube slice.
Figure 5Drying rate of jujube slices at different drying condition.
Figure 6Microstructure and binary images of experiment samples. (A) microstructure of fresh jujube slice; (B–F) microstructure of jujube slices dried by different methods; (a) binary image of fresh jujube slice; (b–f) binary image of jujube slices dried by different methods.
Figure 7Microstructural data of the six groups of jujube slices ((a): cell cross-section area; (b): cell cross-section perimeter; (c): cell roundness).
Figure 8Moisture absorption rate of five groups of dried samples.
Figure 9Visual color characteristics of dried jujube slices: (a) ΔE, (b) L*, (c) a*, and (d) b* values. The same letter above the bars indicates that there is no significant difference between the data, and different letters above the bars indicates that there is significant difference between the data.
Effect of RF heat treatment on AAC of hot air-dried jujube slices.
| Groups | Times | Mean Value | Standard Deviation | Standard Error | 95% Confidence Interval | Minimum | Maximum | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower Limit | Upper Limit | |||||||
| HA | 3 | 233.53 e | 2.95 | 1.70 | 226.20 | 240.85 | 230.21 | 235.85 |
| E-HA + RF | 3 | 269.01 b | 1.18 | 0.68 | 266.08 | 271.94 | 268.30 | 270.37 |
| M-HA + RF | 3 | 285.06 a | 1.31 | 0.75 | 281.81 | 288.30 | 283.55 | 285.88 |
| L-HA + RF | 3 | 243.90 d | 1.16 | 0.67 | 241.01 | 246.78 | 243.01 | 245.21 |
| W-HA + RF | 3 | 255.64 c | 0.44 | 0.25 | 254.56 | 256.73 | 255.14 | 255.90 |
| Total | 15 | 257.43 | 18.88 | 4.88 | 246.97 | 267.88 | 230.21 | 285.88 |
Significance level: α = 0.05. It represents that the conclusion error rate for significance testing must be less than 5%. Data with the same letter were considered not significantly different and data without the same letter were considered significantly different.
Multiple comparison of AAC of jujube slices acquired by five drying methods.
| Group | N | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HA | 3 | 233.53 e | ||||
| L-HA + RF | 3 | 243.90 d | ||||
| W-HA + RF | 3 | 255.64 c | ||||
| E-HA + RF | 3 | 269.01 b | ||||
| M-HA + RF | 3 | 285.06 a | ||||
| Sig. | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Significance level: α = 0.05. It represents that the conclusion error rate for significance testing must be less than 5%. Data with the same letter were considered not significantly different and data without the same letter were considered significantly different.