Literature DB >> 36229663

Clinical and molecular response to tebentafusp in previously treated patients with metastatic uveal melanoma: a phase 2 trial.

Richard D Carvajal1, Marcus O Butler2, Alexander N Shoushtari3,4, Jessica C Hassel5, Alexandra Ikeguchi6, Leonel Hernandez-Aya7, Paul Nathan8, Omid Hamid9, Josep M Piulats10, Matthew Rioth11, Douglas B Johnson12, Jason J Luke13, Enrique Espinosa14, Serge Leyvraz15, Laura Collins16, Howard M Goodall16, Koustubh Ranade17, Chris Holland17, Shaad E Abdullah17, Joseph J Sacco18,19, Takami Sato20.   

Abstract

In patients with previously treated metastatic uveal melanoma, the historical 1 year overall survival rate is 37% with a median overall survival of 7.8 months. We conducted a multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase 2 study of tebentafusp, a soluble T cell receptor bispecific (gp100×CD3), in 127 patients with treatment-refractory metastatic uveal melanoma (NCT02570308). The primary endpoint was the estimation of objective response rate based on RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours) v1.1. Secondary objectives included safety, overall survival, progression-free survival and disease control rate. All patients had at least one treatment-related adverse event, with rash (87%), pyrexia (80%) and pruritus (67%) being the most common. Toxicity was mostly mild to moderate in severity but was greatly reduced in incidence and intensity after the initial three doses. Despite a low overall response rate of 5% (95% CI: 2-10%), the 1 year overall survival rate was 62% (95% CI: 53-70%) with a median overall survival of 16.8 months (95% CI: 12.9-21.3), suggesting benefit beyond traditional radiographic-based response criteria. In an exploratory analysis, early on-treatment reduction in circulating tumour DNA was strongly associated with overall survival, even in patients with radiographic progression. Our findings indicate that tebentafusp has promising clinical activity with an acceptable safety profile in patients with previously treated metastatic uveal melanoma, and data suggesting ctDNA as an early indicator of clinical benefit from tebentafusp need confirmation in a randomized trial.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36229663     DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-02015-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Med        ISSN: 1078-8956            Impact factor:   87.241


  40 in total

1.  Frequent mutation of BAP1 in metastasizing uveal melanomas.

Authors:  J William Harbour; Michael D Onken; Elisha D O Roberson; Shenghui Duan; Li Cao; Lori A Worley; M Laurin Council; Katie A Matatall; Cynthia Helms; Anne M Bowcock
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Exome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic mutations in EIF1AX and SF3B1 in uveal melanoma with disomy 3.

Authors:  Marcel Martin; Lars Maßhöfer; Petra Temming; Sven Rahmann; Claudia Metz; Norbert Bornfeld; Johannes van de Nes; Ludger Klein-Hitpass; Alan G Hinnebusch; Bernhard Horsthemke; Dietmar R Lohmann; Michael Zeschnigk
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  International uveal melanoma incidence trends in view of a decreasing proportion of morphological verification.

Authors:  Andreas Stang; Donald Maxwell Parkin; Jaques Ferlay; Karl-Heinz Jöckel
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Incidence of uveal melanoma in Europe.

Authors:  Gianni Virgili; Gemma Gatta; Laura Ciccolallo; Riccardo Capocaccia; Annibale Biggeri; Emanuele Crocetti; Jean-Michel Lutz; Eugenio Paci
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Very long-term prognosis of patients with malignant uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Emma Kujala; Teemu Mäkitie; Tero Kivelä
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Systematic genomic and translational efficiency studies of uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Chelsea Place Johnson; Ivana K Kim; Bita Esmaeli; Ali Amin-Mansour; Daniel J Treacy; Scott L Carter; Eran Hodis; Nikhil Wagle; Sara Seepo; Xiaoxing Yu; Anne Marie Lane; Evangelos S Gragoudas; Francisca Vazquez; Elizabeth Nickerson; Kristian Cibulskis; Aaron McKenna; Stacey B Gabriel; Gad Getz; Eliezer M Van Allen; Peter A C 't Hoen; Levi A Garraway; Scott E Woodman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Treatment of uveal melanoma: where are we now?

Authors:  Jessica Yang; Daniel K Manson; Brian P Marr; Richard D Carvajal
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 8.168

8.  Molecular profiling of driver events in metastatic uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Joakim Karlsson; Lisa M Nilsson; Suman Mitra; Samuel Alsén; Ganesh Vilas Shelke; Vasu R Sah; Elin M V Forsberg; Ulrika Stierner; Charlotta All-Eriksson; Berglind Einarsdottir; Henrik Jespersen; Lars Ny; Per Lindnér; Erik Larsson; Roger Olofsson Bagge; Jonas A Nilsson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Metastatic disease from uveal melanoma: treatment options and future prospects.

Authors:  Richard D Carvajal; Gary K Schwartz; Tongalp Tezel; Brian Marr; Jasmine H Francis; Paul D Nathan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.