Literature DB >> 36229573

Vaccine protection by Cryptococcus neoformans Δsgl1 is mediated by γδ T cells via TLR2 signaling.

Tyler G Normile1, Timothy H Chu1, Brian S Sheridan1, Maurizio Del Poeta2,3,4.   

Abstract

We previously reported that administration of Cryptococcus neoformans Δsgl1 mutant vaccine, accumulating sterylglucosides (SGs) and having normal capsule (GXM), protects mice from a subsequent infection even during CD4+ T cells deficiency, a condition commonly associated with cryptococcosis. Here, we studied the immune mechanism that confers host protection during CD4+T deficiency. Mice receiving Δsgl1 vaccine produce IFNγ and IL-17A during CD4+ T (or CD8+ T) deficiency, and protection was lost when either cytokine was neutralized. IFNγ and/or IL-17A are produced by γδ T cells, and mice lacking these cells are no longer protected. Interestingly, ex vivo γδ T cells are highly stimulated in producing IFNγ and/or IL-17A by Δsgl1 vaccine, but this production was significantly decreased when cells were incubated with C. neoformans Δcap59/Δsgl1 mutant, accumulating SGs but lacking GXM. GXM modulates toll-like receptors (TLRs), including TLR2. Importantly, neither Δsgl1 nor Δcap59/Δsgl1 stimulate IFNγ or IL-17A production by ex vivo γδ T cells from TLR2-/- mice. Finally, TLR2-/- animals do not produce IL-17A in response to Δsgl1 vaccine and were no longer protected from WT challenge. Our results suggest that SGs may act as adjuvants for GXM to stimulate γδ T cells in producing IFNγ and IL-17A via TLR2, a mechanism that is still preserved upon CD4+ T deficiency.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36229573     DOI: 10.1038/s41385-022-00570-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mucosal Immunol        ISSN: 1933-0219            Impact factor:   8.701


  87 in total

Review 1.  Cryptococcosis in solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Andrés F Henao-Martínez; John David Beckham
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.915

2.  Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  François L Mayer; James W Kronstad
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 17.079

3.  Cryptococcus and HIV.

Authors:  S Akhtar; N Aggarwal; R Demkowicz; N Andreatos; M Gupta
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2020-05-01

4.  Cryptococcal meningitis after fingolimod discontinuation in a patient with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Melanie D Ward; David E Jones; Myla D Goldman
Journal:  Mult Scler Relat Disord       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.339

Review 5.  Immunologic mechanisms of fingolimod and the role of immunosenescence in the risk of cryptococcal infection: A case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Elena Grebenciucova; Anthony T Reder; Jacqueline T Bernard
Journal:  Mult Scler Relat Disord       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 4.339

Review 6.  Immune defence to invasive fungal infections: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Balaji Pathakumari; Guanzhao Liang; Weida Liu
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 6.529

Review 7.  Cryptococcus neoformans: Sex, morphogenesis, and virulence.

Authors:  Youbao Zhao; Xiaorong Lin
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.342

8.  Global warming impact on the expansion of fundamental niche of Cryptococcus gattii VGI in Europe.

Authors:  Massimo Cogliati
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.541

9.  Invasive endemic fungi of the Western Hemisphere.

Authors:  Joshua Fierer
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.882

10.  FTY720 reactivates cryptococcal granulomas in mice through S1P receptor 3 on macrophages.

Authors:  Arielle M Bryan; Jeehyun Karen You; Travis McQuiston; Cristina Lazzarini; Zhijuan Qiu; Brian Sheridan; Barbara Nuesslein-Hildesheim; Maurizio Del Poeta
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.