Literature DB >> 36229555

Short-term outcomes of a new gastrointestinal decompression tube combined with conservative treatment in patients with esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy.

Sun-Jian Wang1, Qing Duan1, Yun-Jing Xue1, Li-Lan She1, Yu Xia1, Ju-Li Lin2.   

Abstract

To compare the short-term outcomes of a new gastrointestinal decompression tube combined with conservative treatment in patients with esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage (EJAL) after total gastrectomy. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 81 patients with EJAL who had undergone total gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y reconstruction at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital between January 2014 and December 2021. The patients were divided into experimental (12 patients with new gastrointestinal decompression tube plus conservative treatment) and control (69 patients with conservative treatment) groups, according to the different treatment methods they received. Anatomic defect size linearly correlated with time to clinical success, hospital stay, and hospital cost in the control group. The two groups showed no significant differences in anastomotic defect size, time of defect after surgery, hospitalization cost, and time of antibiotic use. However, the time to clinical success was significantly shorter in the experimental group than in the control group (16.0 ± 8.3 vs. 23.6 ± 17.8, P = 0.04), as was the length of hospital stay (30.1 ± 6.3 vs. 36.8 ± 16.7, P = 0.017). Furthermore, when the defect size was ≥ 4 mm, the time to clinical success, hospital stay, and hospital cost in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Placement of a new gastrointestinal decompression tube is a safe treatment. When the defect size is ≥ 4 mm, the time to clinical success, length of hospital stay, and hospital cost can be reduced.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conservative treatment; Esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage; Gastric cancer; New gastrointestinal decompression tube

Year:  2022        PMID: 36229555     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09694-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  17 in total

1.  Risk factors for esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after elective gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Migita; Tomoyoshi Takayama; Sohei Matsumoto; Kohei Wakatsuki; Koji Enomoto; Tetsuya Tanaka; Masahiro Ito; Yoshiyuki Nakajima
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Diagnostic sensitivity of contrast swallow for leakage after gastric resection.

Authors:  Hitoshi Tonouchi; Yasuhiko Mohri; Kouji Tanaka; Masaki Ohi; Minako Kobayashi; Koichiro Yamakado; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Significance of intraoperative endoscopy in total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Katsunori Nishikawa; Katsuhiko Yanaga; Hideyuki Kashiwagi; Nobuyoshi Hanyuu; Shuuichi Iwabuchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage after total gastrectomy for esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: options of treatment.

Authors:  Fabio Carboni; Mario Valle; Orietta Federici; Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri; Ida Camperchioli; Rocco Lapenta; Daniela Assisi; Alfredo Garofalo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-08

5.  Cancer Statistics, 2021.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Hannah E Fuchs; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Negative impact of leakage on survival of patients undergoing curative resection for advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Han Mo Yoo; Han Hong Lee; Jung Ho Shim; Hae Myung Jeon; Cho Hyun Park; Kyo Young Song
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Identification of risk factors for esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after gastric surgery.

Authors:  Yasunori Deguchi; Takeo Fukagawa; Shinji Morita; Masaki Ohashi; Makoto Saka; Hitoshi Katai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival after total gastrectomy for carcinoma of the stomach.

Authors:  M Sierzega; P Kolodziejczyk; J Kulig
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Prevention of anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy with perioperative supplemental oxygen administration: a prospective randomized, double-blind, controlled, single-center trial.

Authors:  Mario Schietroma; Emanuela Marina Cecilia; Francesco Carlei; Federico Sista; Giuseppe De Santis; Federica Piccione; Gianfranco Amicucci
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Total gastrectomy risk model: data from 20,011 Japanese patients in a nationwide internet-based database.

Authors:  Masayuki Watanabe; Hiroaki Miyata; Mitsukazu Gotoh; Hideo Baba; Wataru Kimura; Naohiro Tomita; Tohru Nakagoe; Mitsuo Shimada; Yuko Kitagawa; Kenichi Sugihara; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.