F Klevebro1,2, M Konradsson3,4, S Han5, J Luttikold3,4, M Nilsson3,4, M Lindblad3,4, M Andersson3,6, D E Low5. 1. Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. fredrik.klevebro@ki.se. 2. Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Halsov 13, 14186, Stockholm, Sweden. fredrik.klevebro@ki.se. 3. Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 4. Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Halsov 13, 14186, Stockholm, Sweden. 5. Department of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, USA. 6. Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric conduit emptying can occur after esophagectomy and has been shown to be associated with increased risk for postoperative complications. Application of a standardized clinical protocol after esophagectomy including an upper gastrointestinal contrast study has the potential to improve postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Prospective cohort including all patients operated with esophagectomy at two high-volume centers for esophageal surgery. The standardized clinical protocol included an upper gastrointestinal contrast study on day 2 or 3 after surgery. All images were compiled and evaluated for the purpose of the study. Clinical data was collected in IRB approved institutional databases at the participating centers. RESULTS: The study included 119 patients treated with esophagectomy of whom 112 (94.1%) completed an upper gastrointestinal contrast study. The results showed that 8 (7.1%) patients had radiological delayed gastric conduit emptying defined as no emptying of contrast through the pylorus. Partial conduit emptying was seen in 34 (30.4%) patients, and 70 (62.5%) patients had complete conduit emptying. Complete or partial emptying was associated with significantly earlier nasogastric tube removal (3 vs. 6 days) and hospital discharge 8 vs. 17 days, P < 0.001). Radiological signs of delayed gastric conduit emptying were shown to be associated with increased risk of postoperative complications. There was, however, no association with severe postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo score, pulmonary complications, anastomotic leak or need for intensive care. CONCLUSION: The results of the study demonstrate that postoperative upper gastrointestinal contrast studies can be used to assess the level of emptying of the gastric conduit after esophagectomy. Application of upper gastrointestinal contrast study in the ERAS guidelines-driven standardized clinical pathway after esophagectomy has the potential to improve postoperative outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric conduit emptying can occur after esophagectomy and has been shown to be associated with increased risk for postoperative complications. Application of a standardized clinical protocol after esophagectomy including an upper gastrointestinal contrast study has the potential to improve postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Prospective cohort including all patients operated with esophagectomy at two high-volume centers for esophageal surgery. The standardized clinical protocol included an upper gastrointestinal contrast study on day 2 or 3 after surgery. All images were compiled and evaluated for the purpose of the study. Clinical data was collected in IRB approved institutional databases at the participating centers. RESULTS: The study included 119 patients treated with esophagectomy of whom 112 (94.1%) completed an upper gastrointestinal contrast study. The results showed that 8 (7.1%) patients had radiological delayed gastric conduit emptying defined as no emptying of contrast through the pylorus. Partial conduit emptying was seen in 34 (30.4%) patients, and 70 (62.5%) patients had complete conduit emptying. Complete or partial emptying was associated with significantly earlier nasogastric tube removal (3 vs. 6 days) and hospital discharge 8 vs. 17 days, P < 0.001). Radiological signs of delayed gastric conduit emptying were shown to be associated with increased risk of postoperative complications. There was, however, no association with severe postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo score, pulmonary complications, anastomotic leak or need for intensive care. CONCLUSION: The results of the study demonstrate that postoperative upper gastrointestinal contrast studies can be used to assess the level of emptying of the gastric conduit after esophagectomy. Application of upper gastrointestinal contrast study in the ERAS guidelines-driven standardized clinical pathway after esophagectomy has the potential to improve postoperative outcomes.
Authors: Francesco Puccetti; Fredrik Klevebro; MadhanKumar Kuppusamy; Michal Hubka; Donald E Low Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 3.453
Authors: M Konradsson; M I van Berge Henegouwen; C Bruns; M A Chaudry; E Cheong; M A Cuesta; G E Darling; S S Gisbertz; S M Griffin; C A Gutschow; R van Hillegersberg; W Hofstetter; A H Hölscher; Y Kitagawa; J J B van Lanschot; M Lindblad; L E Ferri; D E Low; M D P Luyer; N Ndegwa; S Mercer; K Moorthy; C R Morse; P Nafteux; G A P Nieuwehuijzen; P Pattyn; C Rosman; J P Ruurda; J Räsänen; P M Schneider; W Schröder; B Sgromo; H Van Veer; B P L Wijnhoven; M Nilsson Journal: Dis Esophagus Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 3.429