Literature DB >> 36227526

The Swedish version of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Quality Of Life measure (ACL-QOL): translation and measurement properties.

Stephanie R Filbay1, Hanna Tigerstrand Grevnerts2, Sofi Sonesson2, Henrik Hedevik2, Joanna Kvist3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To translate the ACL-QOL from English to Swedish and evaluate measurement properties for use after surgical and non-surgical management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.
METHODS: The ACL-QOL was translated from English to Swedish and data were pooled from 13 cohorts to enable a comprehensive evaluation of measurement properties in line with COSMIN guidelines. We evaluated internal consistency, test-re-test reliability, measurement error, structural validity [confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)], construct validity and responsiveness (hypothesis testing), and floor/ceiling effects. Results were stratified by time since injury (≤ 1.5 years; 2-10 years, 15-25 years; > 30 years) and ACL management strategy [surgical (n = 1163), non-surgical (n = 570)].
RESULTS: The Swedish ACL-QOL had sufficient internal consistency (total and domain scores) for use in surgically managed (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.744) and non-surgically managed (≥ 0.770) ACL-injured individuals at all time-points. Test-re-test reliability was sufficient [intraclass correlation coefficients: all domains > 0.80, total score 0.93 (95% CI 0.86-0.96)]. The standard error of measurement was 5.6 for the total score and ranged from 7.0 to 10.3 for each domain. CFA indicated sufficient SRMR values when using the total score or five domains; however, CFI and RMSEA values did not meet cut-offs for good model fit. Hypothesis testing indicated sufficient construct validity and responsiveness. Floor effects were negligible and ceiling effects were negligible or minor.
CONCLUSION: The Swedish version of the ACL-QOL has sufficient internal consistency, test-re-test reliability, construct validity and responsiveness, for use in people with ACL injury managed with or without ACL surgery. Model fit could be improved and investigation into the source of misfit is warranted.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Measurement properties; Non-operative management; Reliability; Responsiveness; Validity

Year:  2022        PMID: 36227526     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03265-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   3.440


  32 in total

Review 1.  Health-related quality of life after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie R Filbay; Ilana N Ackerman; Trevor G Russell; Erin M Macri; Kay M Crossley
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 2.  Quality of life in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S R Filbay; A G Culvenor; I N Ackerman; T G Russell; K M Crossley
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Development and validation of the quality of life outcome measure (questionnaire) for chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency.

Authors:  N Mohtadi
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Knee-specific quality-of-life instruments: which ones measure symptoms and disabilities most important to patients?

Authors:  Suzanne M Tanner; Katie N Dainty; Robert G Marx; Alexandra Kirkley
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  TUCK JUMP SCORE IS NOT RELATED TO HOPPING PERFORMANCE OR PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES IN FEMALE SOCCER PLAYERS.

Authors:  Amelia J H Arundale; Joanna Kvist; Martin Hägglund; Anne Fältström
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-05

6.  Cruciate ligament reconstruction and risk of knee osteoarthritis: the association between cruciate ligament injury and post-traumatic osteoarthritis. a population based nationwide study in Sweden, 1987-2009.

Authors:  Richard Nordenvall; Shahram Bahmanyar; Johanna Adami; Ville M Mattila; Li Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Jumping performance based on duration of rehabilitation in female football players after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Amelia J H Arundale; Joanna Kvist; Martin Hägglund; Anne Fältström
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Evidence-based recommendations for the management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture.

Authors:  Stephanie R Filbay; Hege Grindem
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 4.098

9.  Psychological factors are important to return to pre-injury sport activity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: expect and motivate to satisfy.

Authors:  Sofi Sonesson; Joanna Kvist; Clare Ardern; Annika Österberg; Karin Grävare Silbernagel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Radiographic and Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis 32 to 37 Years After Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture.

Authors:  Joanna Kvist; Stephanie Filbay; Christer Andersson; Clare L Ardern; Håkan Gauffin
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.