| Literature DB >> 36225940 |
Lu Han1, Ran Zhao2, Jingyi Yang2, Yingling Zu2, Yanyan Liu2, Jian Zhou2, Linlin Li1, Zhenghua Huang2, Jishuai Zhang3, Quanli Gao1, Yongping Song2, Keshu Zhou2.
Abstract
Background: Consolidative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells (allo-HSCs) after chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) therapy is an emerging modality in hematologic malignancies. Knowledge about the success of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) after CAR-T therapy without a conditioning regimen is limited. Case presentation: We report a patient with relapsed/refractory (R/R) Ph+ B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who underwent anti-CD19 CAR-T immunotherapy. After 1 month of treatment, bone marrow hyperplasia remained reduced with no hematopoietic improvements. In line with this, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) were extracted from an HLA-matched sibling donor and administered to the patient on day 33 after CAR-T cell therapy to support hematopoiesis. On day 40, the level of immature bone marrow lymphocytes was at 0% and minimal residual disease-negative, and the fusion gene BCR/ABL 190 was negative. Chimerism analysis showed full donor chimerism. Three months after CAR-T cells infusion, the patient was still in complete remission with full donor chimerism. However, decreased liver function with skin pigmentation and festering, indicative of acute graft versus host disease, was noted. The treatment was halted owing to financial reasons.Entities:
Keywords: B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia; CAR-T; CD19; allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; conditioning regimen
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36225940 PMCID: PMC9549058 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.965932
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Figure 1Infusion of anti-CD19 CAR-T cells and allo-HSC. (A)Anti-CD19 CAR design and the schematic clinical treatment protocol for anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy. The scFv region that recognizes CD19 was derived from the FMC63 monoclonal antibody. The CAR contained a 4-1BB costimulatory domain and a CD3ζ T-cell activation domain (top panel). Clinical treatment protocol (bottom panel). (B)Levels of cytokines after CAR-T cell therapy. (C)Levels of ferritin after CAR-T cell therapy.(D)Dynamic white blood cell and lymphocyte numbers after CAR-T cell therapy. (E)Copies of lentivirus-containing CAR-T cells in the peripheral blood and bone marrow after CAR-T cell therapy. (F)CAR-T cells and B-cells after CAR-T cell therapy. (G)Ratio of CD4+/CD8+ T cells in the peripheral blood after CAR-T cell therapy.
Figure 2Hepatic function and skin changes after CAR-T cell infusion. (A)Hepatic function after CAR-T cell infusion. Expression of total bilirubin (TBIL; normal range, 0–21 µM), direct bilirubin (DBIL; normal range, 0–5 µM), indirect bilirubin (IBIL; normal range, 0–15 µM), alanine transaminase (ALT; normal range, 5–40 U/L), aspartate transaminase (AST; normal range, 8–40 U/L), total protein (TP; normal range, 64–83 g/L), and albumin (normal range, 34–48 g/L) after CAR-T cell infusion. (B)Skin pigmentation and a festering skin rash after CAR-T cell infusion.
Key clinical events in this case.
| Lines of therapy | Time before or after CAR-T cell therapy | Date of regime | Regime | Date of BM aspiration | Blasts in BM | MRD |
| Response |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -290 days | 2016/3/9 | VDCP+Imatinib | 2016/4/7 | 0.0% | - | 6.70×103 | Morphology CR | |
| 1 | -259 days | 2016/4/9 | CAM+Imatinib | 2016/5/9 | 0.0% | - | 6.39×102 | Morphology CR |
| -227 days | 2016/5/11 | CAM+Imatinib | 2016/6/9 | 0.0% | 0.26% | 2.75×103 | Molecular relapse | |
| -194 days | 2016/6/13 | HD-MTX+Dasatinib | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 2 | -183 days | 2016/6/24 | HD-MTX+Dasatinib | 2016/7/18 | 0.8% | Negative | 3.47×102 | Morphology CR |
| -157 days | 2016/7/20 | VDCP+Dasatinib | 2016/8/18 | 0.0% | Negative | 4.78×103 | Morphology CR | |
| -126 days | 2016/8/20 | CAM+Dasatinib | 2016/9/21 | 11.0% | 10.50% | 2.5×106 | Relapse | |
| -89 days | 2016/9/26 | DOAME+Dasatinib | 2016/10/14 | 0.6% | - | Negative | Molecular CR | |
| 2016/10/25 | 2.6% | 2.70% | 1.37×105 | Molecular relapse | ||||
| 3 | -52 days | 2016/11/2 | DOAME+Dasatinib | 2012/11/23 | 12.0% | 20.20% | 1.69×106 | Relapse |
| -26 days | 2016/11/28 | T315I mutation was detected, withdraw Dasatinib | 2016/11/28 | 33.0% | - | - | Progression | |
| 4 | -24 days | 2016/11/30 | CAG+Pred+L-Asp | 2016/12/7 | 68.0% | - | - | Progression |
| -5 to -3 days | 2016/12/19 to 2016/12/21 | Standard lymphodepleting regimen | ||||||
| 0 to +2 days | 2016/12/24 to 2016/12/26 | Anti-CD19 CAR-T cells infusion | 2017/1/22 | 0% with myelosuppression | - | |||
| +34 days | 2017/1/26 | HSCs infusion | 2017/2/4 | 0% | Negative | Negative | Molecular CR | |
| +90 days | 2017/3/23 | Symptomatic and supportive treatment | 2017/3/27 | 0% | Negative | Negative | Molecular CR | |
| +113 days | 2017/4/15 | The patient abandoned the treatment | 2017/4/15 | 0% | Negative | Negative | Molecular CR | |
BM, bone marrow; MRD, minimal residual disease; CR, complete response; VDCP, vincristine, daunorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone; CAM, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, and 6-mercaptopurine; HD-MTX, high-dose methotrexate; DOAME, dexamethasone, vincristine, cytarabine, mitoxantrone, and etoposide; CAG+Pred+L-Asp, cytarabine, aclacinomycin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, prednisone, and l-asparaginase; HSCs, hematopoietic stem cells; -: not available.