| Literature DB >> 36225711 |
Abstract
Interpersonal relationship is one of the important factors affecting college students' mental health. The relationship between interpersonal relationship and college students' mental health has also become a large number of academic research topics. In order to explore whether there is a correlation between optimism and college students' mental health, and if so, what kind of situation it presents. Based on literature review, mathematical statistics and questionnaire survey, this study optimized the iterative process of clustering algorithm. Extract valuable parts from a large amount of precipitation of students' psychological data, establish data models, and provide decision-making guidance for managers. The results show that there are significant differences between optimists and pessimists in optimistic factors and pessimistic factors. Optimists score significantly higher on optimistic factors than pessimists, while pessimists score significantly lower than pessimists. Conclusion optimism can significantly alleviate life stress and intervene psychological crisis.Entities:
Keywords: college students; interpersonal relationships; mental health; optimism; relevance
Year: 2022 PMID: 36225711 PMCID: PMC9549384 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997910
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1Data mining process of CSMH analysis.
Figure 2Flow chart of association rule mining.
Figure 3Two-level evaluation model.
The difference test of optimism level between optimists and pessimists.
| Factor | Group | M | SD | t | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optimistic factors | Optimist | 11.03 | 0.97 | 20.07 | 0.000 |
| Pessimist | 8.66 | 1.75 | |||
| Pessimistic factors | Optimist | 1.74 | 1.12 | −32.69 | 0.000 |
| Pessimist | 6.82 | 1.66 |
Stepwise multiple regression analysis of college students’ optimism.
| Variable |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Degree of injury | 0.508 | 0.134 | 0.036 | −0.017 |
| Relationship (other) | 0.427 | 0.134 | 0.045 | −0.016 |
| Optimism tendency | 0.458 | 0.106 | 0.044 | −0.092 |
| Relationships (classmates) | 0.417 | 0.265 | 0.037 | 0.1 |
| Apology | 0.443 | 0.114 | 0.04 | 0.094 |
| Relationships (relatives) | 0.441 | 0.164 | 0.037 | −0.047 |
p < 0.001.
T-test analysis of various psychological test factors.
| Variable | Good and above groups | Pass and the following groups | t | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suicide intention | 4.179 ± 1.36 | 4.238 ± 2.55 | 0.638 | 0.1 |
| Anxious | 5.131 ± 2.25 | 4.694 ± 2.16 | 1.226 | 0.121 |
| Depressed | 4.251 ± 1.08 | 6.488 ± 2.33 | 0.598 | 0.141 |
| Bigotry | 4.49 ± 3.32 | 5.06 ± 1.96 | −0.058 | 0.11 |
| Inferiority | 4.437 ± 1.15 | 4.687 ± 2.45 | 0.14 | 0.1 |
| Sensitive | 5.005 ± 2.25 | 7.109 ± 2.14 | 1.056 | 0.027 |
| Social phobia | 4.145 ± 2.18 | 4.294 ± 2.11 | 0.775 | 0.039 |
| Rely on | 5.409 ± 1.19 | 4.444 ± 1.98 | 0.852 | 0.106 |
| Hostile attack | 6.138 ± 3.36 | 6.682 ± 2.53 | 0.234 | 0.122 |
| Somatization | 6.071 ± 2.08 | 6.183 ± 2.47 | 1.094 | 0.017 |
| Impulse | 6.914 ± 1.96 | 5.103 ± 2.16 | 1.044 | 0.153 |
| Force | 4.894 ± 2.07 | 6.436 ± 2.87 | 0.373 | 0.038 |
Correlation coefficient between optimism and mental health variables.
| Variable | Emotional well-being | Psychological well-being | Social well-being | Positive function | Total amount table |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.175 | −0.028 | 0.189 | −0.044 | 0.012 |
| Grade | −0.117 | 0.01 | −0.15 | 0.357 | −0.027 |
| Specialized subject | −0.004 | −0.137 | −0.194 | 0.032 | 0.116 |
| Individual network scale | −0.012 | −0.115 | 0.217 | 0.078 | 0.332 |
| Individual net density | 0.135 | −0.269 | −0.125 | 0.19 | 0.313 |
| Point out degree | −0.166 | −0.057 | 0.073 | 0.105 | 0.138 |
| Point-in degree | 0.023 | −0.049 | −0.15 | 0.172 | 0.275 |
| Approaching centrality | −0.13 | −0.237 | −0.042 | 0.091 | 0.183 |
| Intermediary degree | 0.14 | −0.088 | 0.167 | 0.33 | 0.101 |
p < 0.05 and
p < 0.01.
Figure 4Student initial data.
Figure 5Calculation result of secondary comprehensive clustering coefficient.
Figure 6Partial association rules between psychological factors.
Figure 7Partial association rules between interpersonal sensitive symptoms and basic information.
Figure 8Cluster analysis chart of students’ mental health status.
Figure 9Results of cluster analysis.