Literature DB >> 36225634

Clinical outcome of lymphadenectomy in malignant ovarian germ cell tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ling Han1,2, Yali Chen1,2, Yana Liu1,2, Ai Zheng1,2, Hengxi Chen1,2.   

Abstract

Malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGCTs) are predominately diagnosed in young patients and account for most preadolescent malignant ovarian tumors. Currently, due to the high sensitivity of MOGCTs to chemotherapy and the optimal survival rate after chemotherapy, some researchers have recommended opting for non-surgical treatment. However, the effect of lymphadenectomy (LND) on the survival of patients with MOGCT remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of LND and non-LND in MOGCT surgeries in order to summarize the clinical experience. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and Clinical Trials.gov were searched from inception to December 26, 2021. Data on the rates of survival, relapse, and adverse effects were evaluated using Review Manager software. Fourteen studies with 10,759 participants were included in this review. There were 5863 and 4896 patients in the LND- and LND+ groups, respectively. Pooled results showed that although disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly improved in the LND+ group compared to the LND- group (HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.56 to 0.97; 2091 participants), LND did not significantly affect overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.51 to 1.31; 5298 participants). The operation time was significantly longer in the LND+ group than in the LND- group (P<0.001). Blood loss (P=0.004) and complication rate (P=0.003) were also significantly higher in the LND+ group than in the LND- group. There was no significant difference in mortality rate (P=0.500). LND was associated with an improvement in DFS. However, there was no significant difference in OS in MOGCTs. We recommend that LND should not be a routine surgery for children or young patients with MOGCTs; although it may be beneficial for older people, advanced stage tumors, specific pathological types, and non-chemotherapy patients. AJCR
Copyright © 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Malignant ovarian germ cell tumors; lymphadenectomy; meta-analysis; survival; systematic review

Year:  2022        PMID: 36225634      PMCID: PMC9548013     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cancer Res        ISSN: 2156-6976            Impact factor:   5.942


  33 in total

1.  Performance of lymphadenectomy for apparent early stage malignant ovarian germ cell tumors in the era of platinum-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Dimitrios Nasioudis; Emily M Ko; Ashley F Haggerty; Lori Cory; Robert L Giuntoli; Robert A Burger; Mark A Morgan; Nawar A Latif
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Non-epithelial ovarian cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  I Ray-Coquard; P Morice; D Lorusso; J Prat; A Oaknin; P Pautier; N Colombo
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Outcome and risk factors for recurrence in malignant ovarian germ cell tumors: a MITO-9 retrospective study.

Authors:  Giorgia Mangili; Cristina Sigismondi; Angiolo Gadducci; Gennaro Cormio; Paolo Scollo; Saverio Tateo; Gabriella Ferrandina; Stefano Greggi; Massimo Candiani; Domenica Lorusso
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Prognostic factors in women treated for ovarian yolk sac tumour: a retrospective analysis of 84 cases.

Authors:  Thibault de La Motte Rouge; Patricia Pautier; Annie Rey; Pierre Duvillard; Pierre Kerbrat; Frédéric Troalen; Philippe Morice; Christine Haie-Meder; Stéphane Culine; Catherine Lhommé
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  The role of staging and adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGTs): the MITO-9 study.

Authors:  G Mangili; C Sigismondi; D Lorusso; G Cormio; M Candiani; G Scarfone; F Mascilini; A Gadducci; A M Mosconi; P Scollo; C Cassani; S Pignata; G Ferrandina
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Prognostic factors of patients with yolk sac tumors of the ovary.

Authors:  A Nawa; N Obata; F Kikkawa; M Kawai; T Nagasaka; S Goto; K Nishimori; N Nakashima
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  The prevalence and prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis in malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary.

Authors:  Sanjeev Kumar; Jay P Shah; Christopher S Bryant; Anthony N Imudia; Michele L Cote; Rouba Ali-Fehmi; John M Malone; Robert T Morris
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Non-epithelial ovarian cancer in Denmark - Incidence and survival over nearly 40 years.

Authors:  A K K Bennetsen; L Baandrup; G L Aalborg; S K Kjaer
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  The impact of lymphadenectomy on prognosis and survival of clinically apparent early-stage malignant ovarian germ cell tumors.

Authors:  Beijiao Qin; Wenyan Xu; Yanfang Li
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers' to authors' assessments.

Authors:  Carson Ka-Lok Lo; Dominik Mertz; Mark Loeb
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.