Literature DB >> 36225605

Editorial: Fabrication of in-vitro 3D human tissue models-From cell processing to advanced manufacturing.

Wei Long Ng1, May Win Naing2, Ratima Suntornnond3, Sanjairaj Vijayavenkataraman4,5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D bioprinting; bio-inks; biofabrication; cell expansion; in-vitro 3D tissue models; microcarriers

Year:  2022        PMID: 36225605      PMCID: PMC9549280          DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1035601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol        ISSN: 2296-4185


× No keyword cloud information.
Over the years, the field of toxicology testing has pivoted from the use of animal models to 2D human cell cultures and finally the adaptation of in-vitro 3D human testing models. It is important that these in-vitro 3D human testing models predicts the human responses in an accurate and reliable manner (Nam et al., 2015; Ng and Yeong, 2019). This is largely driven by the significant discrepancies between adverse effects of chemicals in humans and animals (Lilienblum et al., 2008). The use of animal models has several caveats which include the differences in the absorption or distribution of the chemicals/substances; the way the substances are metabolized and the short duration of animal lifespan to accurately monitor disease development. Similarly, conventional 2D cell culture is unable to adequately recapitulate the in vivo cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions found in native three-dimensional (3D) tissues and it has been reported that numerous types of cells have expressed different phenotypes and genomic profiles in 2D versus 3D cell culture (Duval et al., 2017; Jensen and Teng, 2020). Hence, in-vitro 3D human tissue models would bring about the necessary complexity that may improve the reliability and accuracy of test outcomes. Some of the fabricated in-vitro 3D human tissue models for various testing applications include skin tissue models (Ng et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2021), alveolar lung tissue models (Klein et al., 2013; Costa et al., 2019; Ng et al., 2021) and liver tissue models (Lee et al., 2015; Skardal et al., 2015; Hiller et al., 2018). However, there are some challenges faced in translating this to widespread use. Successful production of in-vitro tissue models is dependent on two critical aspects–ability to carry out large-scale manufacturing of cells (growing cells in vast quantities within a homogeneous physical and chemical environment) (Jordan et al., 2018; He et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2022) and advanced manufacturing platforms (highly-automated fabrication of in-vitro tissue models with high throughput rates and repeatability) (Ozbolat and Hospodiuk, 2016; Ng et al., 2019; Zhuang et al., 2019; Ng et al., 2020a; Ng et al., 2020b; Li et al., 2020; Ng et al., 2022; Suntornnond et al., 2022). The goal of this Research Topic is to focus on the recent developments in cell processing techniques and advanced manufacturing approaches which include the current state-of-the-arts, recent developments and major accomplishments, future challenges, and directions towards fabrication of 3D in-vitro human tissue models, specifically in large-scale cell manufacturing and advanced manufacturing platforms. There is a total of 6 published articles in this Research Topic: 2 review papers and 4 original research papers. One of the review papers is on large-scale cell manufacturing and it introduced a new multiple-use aseptic connector that can act as potential replacement for two main types of commonly-used devices for small volume fluid transfers (single-use sterile connectors and tube welders) in cell therapy manufacturing. The review paper highlighted that multiple-use aseptic connector can fulfil the unmet need for a sterile connector suitable for small volume fluid transfers and reduce the footprint, complexity and cost of culture systems (Wu et al.). The next review paper is on advanced manufacturing platforms and it discussed how the emergence and development of smart metamaterial, advanced optimization algorithm and advanced manufacturing technique have resulted in a paradigm shift in the design, fabrication and characterization of bone scaffolds (Huo et al.). The review paper provided detailed information on the design of microstructure of the bone scaffold, application of metamaterial in the design of bone scaffolds and optimization of the microstructure in bone scaffolds, the advanced manufacturing of bone scaffolds and lastly the various techniques used for evaluating the performance of bone scaffolds. Next, the 4 original research papers are related to the advanced manufacturing platforms. One of the original research papers reported a versatile cell-friendly photopolymerization approach that facilitated single-step fabrication of hollow-core and solid-core hydrogel fibres loaded with living cells (Savelyev et al.). The approach was implemented by extruding cell-laden hyaluronic acid glycidyl methacrylate hydrogel directly into an aqueous solution containing free radicals generated by continuous blue light photo-excitation of the flavin mononucleotide/triethanolamine photo-initiator to induce diffusion-limited photo-fabrication. The next original research paper reported the fabrication of affordable, flexible and highly-reproducible 3D bioprinted colorectal cancer model (Sbirkov et al.). The fabricated 3D colorectal cancer models exhibited greater pathomorphological resemblance to tumours and increased overall resistance to commonly used chemotherapeutics as compared to 2D cell cultures. Hence, the study has reported a novel accessible 3D tissue model platform for disease modelling and drug testing. Another original research paper demonstrated the potential of micro-vascularized skin-on-a-chip tissue equivalents for systematic delivery of therapeutics (Jones et al.). The novel vascularized skin-on-a-chip model consisted of human-derived primary and immortalized cells (pericyte co-cultures); the results indicated that vascularization enhanced the stratification and differentiation of the epidermis to form matured skin equivalents in microfluidic chips. The last original research paper demonstrated the fabrication of personalized 3D-printed bioresorbable airway external splint for sever tracheomalacia (Yu et al.). The study evaluated the performance of 3D-printed bioresorbable airway external splint on nine different young patients with severe tracheomalacia and the results showed that the 3D printed splint not only limited the external compression and prevented airway collapse but also ensured the growth potential of the airway, making it a safe, reliable, and effective treatment for congenital heart disease patients with tracheomalacia. Numerous studies have shown that the use of conventional 2D cell culture is unable to adequately recapitulate important in-vivo cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions and numerous cell types have expressed different phenotypes and genomic profiles in 2D versus 3D cell culture (Breslin and O’Driscoll, 2013; Ng et al., 2016; Laschke and Menger, 2017). The combination of advanced cell processing approaches and 3D bioprinting technology is critical for highly-reproducible automated fabrication of 3D human tissue models for various testing applications. We anticipate that insights and perspectives from this Research Topic would encourage the use of biomimetic 3D human tissue models for various drug/chemical testing applications to improve the prediction of human responses in an accurate and reliable manner.
  24 in total

Review 1.  Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting.

Authors:  Ibrahim T Ozbolat; Monika Hospodiuk
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH).

Authors:  W Lilienblum; W Dekant; H Foth; T Gebel; J G Hengstler; R Kahl; P-J Kramer; H Schweinfurth; K-M Wollin
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Proof-of-concept: 3D bioprinting of pigmented human skin constructs.

Authors:  Wei Long Ng; Jovina Tan Zhi Qi; Wai Yee Yeong; May Win Naing
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 4.  Vat polymerization-based bioprinting-process, materials, applications and regulatory challenges.

Authors:  Wei Long Ng; Jia Min Lee; Miaomiao Zhou; Yi-Wen Chen; Kai-Xing Alvin Lee; Wai Yee Yeong; Yu-Fang Shen
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 5.  Three-dimensional cell culture: the missing link in drug discovery.

Authors:  Susan Breslin; Lorraine O'Driscoll
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 7.851

6.  Generation of a 3D Liver Model Comprising Human Extracellular Matrix in an Alginate/Gelatin-Based Bioink by Extrusion Bioprinting for Infection and Transduction Studies.

Authors:  Thomas Hiller; Johanna Berg; Laura Elomaa; Viola Röhrs; Imran Ullah; Katrin Schaar; Ann-Christin Dietrich; Munir A Al-Zeer; Andreas Kurtz; Andreas C Hocke; Stefan Hippenstiel; Henry Fechner; Marie Weinhart; Jens Kurreck
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Layer-by-layer ultraviolet assisted extrusion-based (UAE) bioprinting of hydrogel constructs with high aspect ratio for soft tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Pei Zhuang; Wei Long Ng; Jia An; Chee Kai Chua; Lay Poh Tan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Controlling Droplet Impact Velocity and Droplet Volume: Key Factors to Achieving High Cell Viability in Sub-Nanoliter Droplet-based Bioprinting.

Authors:  Wei Long Ng; Xi Huang; Viktor Shkolnikov; Guo Liang Goh; Ratima Suntornnond; Wai Yee Yeong
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2021-10-28

9.  In-situ scalable manufacturing of Epstein-Barr virus-specific T-cells using bioreactor with an expandable culture area (BECA).

Authors:  Sixun Chen; Ahmad Amirul Bin Abdul Rahim; Who-Whong Wang; Rachael Cheong; Akshaya V Prabhu; Jerome Zu Yao Tan; May Win Naing; Han Chong Toh; Dan Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 10.  Is It Time to Start Transitioning From 2D to 3D Cell Culture?

Authors:  Caleb Jensen; Yong Teng
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2020-03-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.