| Literature DB >> 36225374 |
Walid Janati1, Karima Mikou1, Lahsen El Ghadraoui1, Faouzi Errachidi1.
Abstract
Low-cost and environmentally friendly agricultural practices have received increasing attention in recent years. Developing microbial inoculants containing phosphate (P) solubilizing bacteria (PSB) represents an emerging biological solution to improve rhizosphere P availability. The present study aims to explore PSB strains isolated from soils located at different bioclimatic stages in Morocco and present in various legumes rhizosphere to improve agronomic microbial fertilizer's effectiveness. It was also aimed to test the isolated strains for their ability to solubilize P in NBRIP medium with Tricalcium P (Ca3 (PO4)2) (TCP), rock phosphate (RP), and their combination as a source of phosphorus, by (22) experiment design. Bacterial strains with a high P solubility index (PSI) were selected, characterized, and compared to commercial control. The vanadate-molybdate method was used to estimate P solubilization activity. Stress tolerance to salinity, acidity, drought, and temperature was tested. From all isolated strains (64), 12 were screened as promising biotechnological interest because of their P solubilization and their good resistance to different drastic conditions. Besides, the strain WJEF15 showed the most P solubility efficiency in NBRIP solid medium with a PSI of 4.1; while the WJEF61 strain was located as the most efficient strain in NBRIP-TCP liquid medium by releasing 147.62 mg.l-1 of soluble P. In contrast, in the NBRIP-RP medium, the strain WJEF15 presented maximum solubilization with 25.16 mg.l-1. The experiment design showed that a combination of RP and TCP with max level progressively increases P solubilization by 20.58%, while the WJEF63 strain has the most efficient concentration of 102.69 mg.l-1. Indeed, among the selected strains, four strains were able to limit tested fungi growth. Thus, results reveal a potential effect of selecting PSBs to support cropping cultures as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR).Entities:
Keywords: TCP; antifungal acitivity; microbial fertilizers; rock phosphate; stress tolerance; sustainability
Year: 2022 PMID: 36225374 PMCID: PMC9549286 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.958300
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Factors’ levels (X1 and X2) involved in P solubilization.
| Min level | Max level | |
| –1 | +1 | |
| X1 : RP | 1% | 2.5% |
| X2 : TCP | 1% | 2.5% |
Experimental design developed to study the effects of factors (X1: RP and X2: TCP) and their interaction (X1*X2) on pH medium and P concentration.
| Experiment | X0 | X1 | X2 | X1*2 | YP[C] | YpH |
| 1 | +1 | –1 | –1 | +1 | – | – |
| 2 | +1 | –1 | +1 | –1 | – | – |
| 3 | +1 | +1 | –1 | –1 | – | – |
| 4 | +1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | – | – |
YP[C]: concentration of P solubilized response function. YpH: pH medium response function.
Physico-chemical and PSBs analysis of the studied soil samples.
| Sites | Tafrant | A. Yaakoub | D.A. Amira | A. Saleh |
| Coordinates | ||||
| Altitude (m) | 312.5 | 566 | 1548 | 922 |
| T.avg/year (°C) | 18.1 | 17.8 | 12.1 | 15.5 |
| P.avg/year (mm) | 866 | 549 | 683 | 651 |
| PSBs load (Cells/g of soil) | 5.95*103 | 1.98*105 | 1.04*106 | 3.16*107 |
| pH-water | 8.26 | 8.323 | 8.067 | 8.273 |
| Electrical conductivity 1/5 (ds/m) | 187.033 | 300.333 | 241.233 | 173.2 |
| Cation exchange capacity (cmol+/kg) | 40.987 | 32.28 | 37.227 | 31.563 |
| Organic matter (%) | 2.573 | 5.103 | 5.64 | 4.38 |
| N total (%) | 0.126 | 0.255 | 0.324 | 0.174 |
| N-NH4 + N-NO3 (mg/kg N) | 7.383 | 8.867 | 8.167 | 7.4 |
| P2O5 (mg/kg) | 10 | 46.7 | 98.7 | 23.3 |
| K2O (mg/kg) | 432 | 846.3 | 990.7 | 373 |
| CaO (mg/kg) | 9,450 | 8,550 | 5,250 | 6,375 |
| MgO (mg/kg) | 410.667 | 854 | 1213.333 | 917.333 |
FIGURE 1Principal component analysis of different soil in the function of mineralogical composition.
FIGURE 2Phosphate solubilization index (PSI) of isolated strains on solid NBRIP medium.
FIGURE 3PSBs solubilization capacity of TCP and RP after 7 days in liquid medium.
FIGURE 4Negative correlation between pH medium and solubilization concentration.
Effect of phosphorus source (RP and TCP) on culture medium acidification.
| Isolates | Model coefficient | RP effect | TCP effect | Interaction RP/TCP |
| Coefficients | a0 | a1 | a2 | a12 |
| Control | 1.931 | 0.013 | 0.055 | –0.016 |
| Commercial control | 0.335 | –0.025 | –0.079 | 0.016 |
| WJEF15 | 3.278 | –0.034 | 0.029 | 0.047 |
| WJEF56 | 2.793 | 0.042 | –0.019 | –0.101 |
| WJEF26 | 2.921 | –0.020 | –0.138 | –0.019 |
| WJEF38 | 3.237 | 0.063 | 0.047 | –0.129 |
| WJEF41 | 3.193 | 0.020 | 0.075 | –0.143 |
| WJEF45 | 3.222 | 0.011 | 0.146 | –0.123 |
| WJEF46 | 3.209 | 0.057 | 0.104 | –0.076 |
| WJEF51 | 3.261 | 0.009 | 0.101 | –0.149 |
| WJEF59 | 3.089 | 0.084 | 0.100 | –0.115 |
| WJEF61 | 3.237 | 0.051 | 0.092 | –0.109 |
| WJEF63 | 3.199 | 0.085 | 0.140 | –0.161 |
Impact of phosphorus source (RP and TCP) on P solubilization in culture medium.
| Isolates | Model coefficient | RP effect | TCP effect | Interaction RP/TCP |
| Coefficients | a0 | a1 | a2 | a12 |
| Control | 0.481 | –0.055 | –0.031 | –0.049 |
| Commercial control | 1.076 | –0.030 | 0.178 | –0.037 |
| WJEF15 | 14.637 | –0.598 | 8.050 | –0.405 |
| WJEF56 | 10.102 | 0.228 | 4.623 | –1.197 |
| WJEF26 | 10.865 | –2.116 | 3.722 | –0.898 |
| WJEF38 | 15.491 | –1.406 | 7.430 | –0.873 |
| WJEF41 | 14.208 | 0.570 | 8.394 | –2.034 |
| WJEF45 | 14.513 | 0.912 | 8.628 | –1.993 |
| WJEF46 | 14.738 | 0.966 | 8.768 | –1.774 |
| WJEF51 | 16.397 | –0.182 | 8.601 | –1.119 |
| WJEF59 | 16.196 | 0.008 | 7.785 | –1.589 |
| WJEF61 | 16.802 | 0.713 | 8.019 | –1.779 |
| WJEF63 | 16.574 | 1.452 | 8.743 | –1.094 |
Experimental design results done after P solubilization by isolate WJEF26.
| Experiments | X1 | X2 | X12 | YpH | YP[C] |
| 1 | –1 | –1 | +1 | 4.3 | 33.442 |
| 2 | +1 | –1 | –1 | 4.7725 | 23.696 |
| 3 | –1 | +1 | –1 | 5.1175 | 70.405 |
| 4 | +1 | +1 | +1 | 5.165 | 46.289 |
YpH: Function response of pH medium during P solubilization. YP[C]: Function response of P solubilization (mg.l–1).
FIGURE 5(A) Effects of studied factors (X1 and X2) and their interaction on pH medium in the presence of WJEF26 strain. (B) Effects of studied factors (X1 and X2) and their interaction on P[C] in the presence of WJEF26 strain. (C) Effects of studied factors (X1 and X2) and their interaction on pH medium in the presence of WJEF63 strain. (D) Effects of studied factors (X1 and X2) and their interaction on P[C] in the presence of WJEF63 strain.
Experimental design results done after P solubilization by isolate WJEF63.
| Experiments | X1 | X2 | X12 | YpH | YP[C] |
| 1 | –1 | –1 | +1 | 4.547 | 21.144 |
| 2 | +1 | –1 | –1 | 4.482 | 41.505 |
| 3 | –1 | +1 | –1 | 4.525 | 99.836 |
| 4 | +1 | +1 | +1 | 4.647 | 102.699 |
YpH: Function response of pH medium during P solubilization. YP[C]: Function response of P solubilization (mg.l–1).
FIGURE 6(A) The effect of studied factors (X1 and X2) and their interaction on pH surface response by WJEF26 strain. (B) The effect of studied factors (X1 and X2) and their interaction on the response surface of P[C] by WJEF26 strain. (C) Effect of studied factors (X1 and X2) and their interaction on response surface of pH with WJEF63 strain. (D) Effect of studied factors (X1 and X2) and their interaction on response surface of P[C] with WJEF63 strain.
Morphological and biochemical characteristics of selected strains.
| PSB strains/characteristics | Commercial control | WJEF15 | WJEF26 | WJEF38 | WJEF39 | WJEF41 | WJEF45 | WJEF46 | WJEF51 | WJEF56 | WJEF59 | WJEF61 | WJEF63 | |
| Colony morphology | Margin | I | E | E | E | E | I | E | I | E | I | I | E | E |
| Color | W | Y | Y | OW | Y | OW | OW | OW | OW | Y | Y | OW | OW | |
| Texture | D | V | V | V | V | M | V | M | V | M | M | V | V | |
| Cells morphology | Shape | R | R | R | C | R | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | CB |
| Arrangement | S | S | CR | S | S | S | S | S | SP | S | S | S | S | |
| Physiological tests | Gram staining | + | + | – | + | – | + | + | – | – | – | + | – | – |
| Catalase | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| Motility | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| Gelatin hydrolysis | – | + | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | + | + | – | – | |
| Urea hydrolysis | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| GPA (Glucose) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| GPA (Lactose) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| Starch | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | + | – | |
Tested positive, utilized substrate; tested negative, not utilized substrate. E, entire; I, irregular; Y, yellow; W, white; OW, off-white; D, Dry; V, viscid; M, mucoid; R, rod; C, cocci; CB, coccobacillus; SP, single pairs; CR, chain rods; and S, solitaire.
Physiological characteristics of selected isolates under temperature, pH, and salinity pressure.
| PSB strains/pressures | Commercial control | WJEF15 | WJEF26 | WJEF38 | WJEF39 | WJEF41 | WJEF45 | WJEF46 | WJEF51 | WJEF56 | WJEF59 | WJEF61 | WJEF63 | |
| GT | 24°C | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 37°C | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | –1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 48°C | 1 | –1 | –1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 55°C | –1 | –1 | –1 | –1 | –1 | –1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | –1 | –1 | 1 | 1 | |
| G pH | pH 3 | –1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| pH 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| pH 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| pH 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| pH 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| pH 13 | –1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| GS | 1.6M | 1 | 1 | 1 | –1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | –1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2M | –1 | –1 | –1 | –1 | –1 | –1 | 1 | –1 | 1 | –1 | 1 | 1 | –1 | |
GT, growth temperature; GpH, growth pH; GS, growth salinity. Tested positive/utilized as substrate; tested negative/not utilized substrate.
FIGURE 7Biomass in function of salt concentrations g/L.
FIGURE 8Biomass in the function of PEG concentrations.
FIGURE 9Principal correspondence analysis of tested isolates on physico-chemical pressure.
Fungal inhibited radial growth behavior of tested PSB.
| PSB strains/Fungal strains | Commercial control | WJEF15 | WJEF26 | WJEF38 | WJEF39 | WJEF41 | WJEF45 | WJEF46 | WJEF51 | WJEF56 | WJEF59 | WJEF61 | WJEF63 |
|
| 21.31 | – | 23.21 | – | – | – | – | – | 21.42 | – | 49.15 | – | – |
|
| – | 20.44 | – | 18.97 | – | – | 18 | 24 | 18.36 | – | 23.51 | 22.44 | – |
|
| 18.64 | – | 21.15 | – | 22.92 | – | – | 16.67 | – | – | 32.76 | – | – |
|
| 26.92 | – | – | – | – | 33.89 | – | – | 20.33 | – | – | – | – |
|
| 25.53 | – | 16.03 | – | – | – | – | – | 18 | – | – | – | – |
|
| – | 23.07 | 21.15 | 17.31 | 26.93 | 30.77 | 25 | – | – | 36.54 | 32.92 | 19.23 | 21.42 |