Literature DB >> 36224555

A bayesian approach to model the underlying predictors of early recurrence and postoperative death in patients with colorectal Cancer.

Leila Mahmoudi1, Ramezan Fallah1, Ghodratollah Roshanaei2, Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi3,4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at utilizing a Bayesian approach semi-competing risks technique to model the underlying predictors of early recurrence and postoperative Death in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).
METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 284 patients with colorectal cancer, who underwent surgery, referred to Imam Khomeini clinic in Hamadan from 2001 to 2017. The primary outcomes were the probability of recurrence, the probability of Mortality without recurrence, and the probability of Mortality after recurrence. The patients 'recurrence status was determined from patients' records. The Bayesian survival modeling was carried out by semi-competing risks illness-death models, with accelerated failure time (AFT) approach, in R 4.1 software. The best model was chosen according to the lowest deviance information criterion (DIC) and highest logarithm of the pseudo marginal likelihood (LPML).
RESULTS: The log-normal model (DIC = 1633, LPML = -811), was the optimal model. The results showed that gender(Time Ratio = 0.764: 95% Confidence Interval = 0.456-0.855), age at diagnosis (0.764: 0.538-0.935 ), T3 stage (0601: 0.530-0.713), N2 stage (0.714: 0.577-0.935 ), tumor size (0.709: 0.610-0.929), grade of differentiation at poor (0.856: 0.733-0.988), and moderate (0.648: 0.503-0.955) levels, and the number of chemotherapies (1.583: 1.367-1.863) were significantly related to recurrence. Also, age at diagnosis (0.396: 0.313-0.532), metastasis to other sites (0.566: 0.490-0.835), T3 stage (0.363: 0.592 - 0.301), T4 stage (0.434: 0.347-0.545), grade of differentiation at moderate level (0.527: 0.387-0.674), tumor size (0.595: 0.500-0.679), and the number of chemotherapies (1.541: 1.332-2.243) were the significantly predicted the death. Also, age at diagnosis (0.659: 0.559-0.803), and the number of chemotherapies (2.029: 1.792-2.191) were significantly related to mortality after recurrence.
CONCLUSION: According to specific results obtained from the optimal Bayesian log-normal model for terminal and non-terminal events, appropriate screening strategies and the earlier detection of CRC leads to substantial improvements in the survival of patients.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian; Colorectal cancer; Early recurrence; Mortality; Semi-competing risks

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36224555      PMCID: PMC9555178          DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01746-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol        ISSN: 1471-2288            Impact factor:   4.612


  50 in total

1.  Maximum likelihood estimation for interval-censored data using a Weibull-based accelerated failure time model.

Authors:  P M Odell; K M Anderson; R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The prognostic impact of the time interval to recurrence for the mortality in recurrent colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A M Kaiser; J-C Kang; L S Chan; R W Beart
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Incidence and patterns of recurrence following curative resection for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  D I Obrand; P H Gordon
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 4.  Socioeconomic status and changing inequalities in colorectal cancer? A review of the associations with risk, treatment and outcome.

Authors:  Mieke J Aarts; Valery E P P Lemmens; Marieke W J Louwman; Anton E Kunst; Jan Willem W Coebergh
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Associations of alcohol intake, smoking, physical activity and obesity with survival following colorectal cancer diagnosis by stage, anatomic site and tumor molecular subtype.

Authors:  Harindra Jayasekara; Dallas R English; Andrew Haydon; Allison M Hodge; Brigid M Lynch; Christophe Rosty; Elizabeth J Williamson; Mark Clendenning; Melissa C Southey; Mark A Jenkins; Robin Room; John L Hopper; Roger L Milne; Daniel D Buchanan; Graham G Giles; Robert J MacInnis
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 6.  Sex- and gender-specific disparities in colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  Sung-Eun Kim; Hee Young Paik; Hyuk Yoon; Jung Eun Lee; Nayoung Kim; Mi-Kyung Sung
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Inequalities in survival from colorectal cancer: a comparison of the impact of deprivation, treatment, and host factors on observed and cause specific survival.

Authors:  H Wrigley; P Roderick; S George; J Smith; M Mullee; J Goddard
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  The benefit of leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil as postoperative adjuvant therapy for primary colon cancer: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocol C-03.

Authors:  N Wolmark; H Rockette; B Fisher; D L Wickerham; C Redmond; E R Fisher; J Jones; E P Mamounas; L Ore; N J Petrelli
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Early recurrence after liver resection for colorectal metastases: risk factors, prognosis, and treatment. A LiverMetSurvey-based study of 6,025 patients.

Authors:  Luca Viganò; Lorenzo Capussotti; Réal Lapointe; Eduardo Barroso; Catherine Hubert; Felice Giuliante; Jan N M Ijzermans; Darius F Mirza; Dominique Elias; René Adam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Tumor location as a novel high risk parameter for stage II colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Biyuan Wang; Jiao Yang; Shuting Li; Meng Lv; Zheling Chen; Enxiao Li; Min Yi; Jin Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.