Literature DB >> 3622439

Carcinogenic risk assessment: comparison of estimated safe doses for rats and mice.

J J Chen, D W Gaylor.   

Abstract

Data from the National Cancer Institute/National Toxicology Program (NCI/NTP) carcinogenesis bioassays were examined to compare cancer risks in rats and mice. Only those bioassays where chemicals were administered orally were used. The ratios for rats to mice of the virtually safe dose (VSD) levels associated with a risk of 10(-6) were compared. Comparisons of the ratios were made for those chemicals that NCI/NTP determined to be carcinogenic in at least one species and that showed a dose response trend in the same sex at the same tissue/organ site in the other species. In all, 69 comparisons from 38 carcinogens were performed. The overall geometric mean of the VSD ratios is 1.27 in terms of concentration (ppm); the mean and the standard deviation in logarithm are 0.24 and 1.83, respectively. The VSD ratios vary from 1:51 to 49:1. Without the restriction of the same sex and site, the geometric mean of the minimum VSDs is 1.38, and the standard deviation in logarithm is 1.79. By directly comparing the VSDs for rats and mice (as they are performed for risk assessment), this study showed a probability of 0.10 that the ratio of VSDs is greater than 10, and the ratio is greater than 20 with a probability of 0.05 when a chemical is carcinogenic in both species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3622439      PMCID: PMC1474633          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.8772305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  6 in total

1.  Confidence intervals and test of hypotheses concerning dose response relations inferred from animal carcinogenicity data.

Authors:  K S Crump; H A Guess; K L Deal
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Linear interpolation algorithm for low dose risk assessment of toxic substances.

Authors:  D W Gaylor; R L Kodell
Journal:  J Environ Pathol Toxicol       Date:  1980-11

3.  Interspecies comparison of carcionogenic potency.

Authors:  E Crouch; R Wilson
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1979-11

4.  Relative potency of chemical carcinogens in rodents.

Authors:  D W Gaylor; J J Chen
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Uncertainties in interspecies extrapolations of carcinogenicity.

Authors:  E A Crouch
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  A carcinogenic potency database of the standardized results of animal bioassays.

Authors:  L S Gold; C B Sawyer; R Magaw; G M Backman; M de Veciana; R Levinson; N K Hooper; W R Havender; L Bernstein; R Peto
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Ratcheting up cancer potency estimates.

Authors:  Edmund A C Crouch; Gilbert S Omenn
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Alternative tests: carcinogenesis as an example.

Authors:  B Schwetz; D Gaylor
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 3.  Predicting the carcinogenicity of chemicals in humans from rodent bioassay data.

Authors:  G Goodman; R Wilson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.031

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.