Literature DB >> 36223007

Power analysis for single-case designs: Computations for (AB)k designs.

Larry V Hedges1, William R Shadish2, Prathiba Natesan Batley3.   

Abstract

Currently, the design standards for single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) are based on validity considerations as prescribed by the What Works Clearinghouse. However, there is a need for design considerations such as power based on statistical analyses. We compute and derive power using computations for (AB)k designs with multiple cases which are common in SCEDs. Our computations show that effect size has the maximum impact on power followed by the number of subjects and then the number of phase reversals. An effect size of 0.75 or higher, at least one set of phase reversals (i.e., where k > 1), and at least three subjects showed high power. The latter two conditions agree with current standards about either having at least an ABAB design or a multiple baseline design with three subjects to meet design standards. An effect size of 0.75 or higher is not uncommon in SCEDs either. Autocorrelations, the number of time-points per phase, and intraclass correlations had a smaller but non-negligible impact on power. In sum, power analyses in the present study show that conditions to meet power requirements are not unreasonable in SCEDs. The software code to compute power is available on GitHub for the use of the reader.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ABAB designs; Power; Single case designs; Single case experimental designs; Type-I error; Type-II error

Year:  2022        PMID: 36223007     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01971-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  6 in total

1.  A standardized mean difference effect size for single case designs.

Authors:  Larry V Hedges; James E Pustejovsky; William R Shadish
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 5.273

2.  Bayesian unknown change-point models to investigate immediacy in single case designs.

Authors:  Prathiba Natesan; Larry V Hedges
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2017-04-13

3.  A standardized mean difference effect size for multiple baseline designs across individuals.

Authors:  Larry V Hedges; James E Pustejovsky; William R Shadish
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 5.273

4.  A Monte Carlo evaluation of masked visual analysis in response-guided versus fixed-criteria multiple-baseline designs.

Authors:  John M Ferron; Seang-Hwane Joo; Joel R Levin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2017-09-09

5.  Investigating immediacy in multiple-phase-change single-case experimental designs using a Bayesian unknown change-points model.

Authors:  Prathiba Natesan Batley; Tom Minka; Larry Vernon Hedges
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-08

6.  Accurate models vs. accurate estimates: A simulation study of Bayesian single-case experimental designs.

Authors:  Prathiba Natesan Batley; Larry Vernon Hedges
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-02-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.