| Literature DB >> 36221410 |
Jie Qu1,2, Zhen Tian1, Xin Li1, Yong Zhang1,2.
Abstract
To explore the clinical efficacy of quadruple surgery (anterior segment pars plana vitrectomy + phacoemulsification + posterior capsulorhexis + intraocular lens (IOL) implantation + trabeculectomy) and dual surgery (phacoemulsification + IOL implantation + trabeculectomy) to treat medically uncontrolled acute primary angle-closure glaucoma (APACG). The clinical data of 44 patients (45 eyes) with APACG treated in the Department of Ophthalmology of Taihe Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into 2 groups based on quadruple surgery and dual surgery. There were 20 patients (20 eyes) underwent quadruple surgery in group A. And there were 24 patients (25 eyes) dual surgery in group B. The changes in intraocular pressure (IOP), visual improvement, and complications were observed between the 2 groups preoperatively and 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was the influencing factor of postoperative BCVA at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. Before surgery, the mean IOP of group A was significantly higher than that of group B (P < .001), and no significant difference was found in the BCVA, age, gender, eyes, axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD) (PBCVA = 0.12, Page = 0.76, Peyes = 0.20, Pgender = 0.37, PAL = 0.94, PACD = 0.08). On comparison at postoperative 1week, there was no significant difference in the IOP and BCVA between the 2 groups (PIOP = 0.64, PBCVA = 0.66). The mean IOP of group A was significantly lower than that of group B 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively (P1month = 0.002, P3months < 0.001, P6months < 0.001). The degree of visual acuity recovery was significantly higher in group A at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively (P1month = 0.03, P3months = 0.02, P6months = 0.02). During treatment, the incidence of complications in group B was significantly higher than that in group A (P < .01). The clinical efficacy of anterior segment pars plana vitrectomy combined with posterior capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification, and trabeculectomy elicits clinical safety in treating medically uncontrolled APACG. It has remarkable effects and leads to a significant decrease in the occurrence of complications.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36221410 PMCID: PMC9542570 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030946
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Multiple linear regression analysis for intraocular pressure conditions postoperatively.
| Factors | 1 wk | 1mo | 3 mo | 6 mo | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | t | β | t | β | t | β | t | |||||
| BCVA | -0.344 | -0.382 | .70 | -0.928 | -1.562 | .13 | -0.326 | -0.497 | .62 | -0.378 | -0.545 | .59 |
| IOP (mm Hg) | 0.024 | 0.589 | .56 | -0.038 | -1.439 | .29 | -0.036 | -1.218 | .23 | -0.059 | -1.893 | .07 |
| Age (yrs) | -0.016 | -0.197 | .85 | 0.015 | 0.290 | .77 | -0.037 | -0.637 | .53 | 0.054 | 0.864 | .39 |
| Gender | -0.197 | -0.153 | .88 | -0.913 | -1.074 | .29 | -0.796 | -0.849 | .40 | -0.815 | -0.821 | .42 |
| Eyes | 0.099 | 0.088 | .93 | -1.269 | -1.701 | .10 | -1.635 | -1.987 | .05 | -0.883 | -1.014 | .32 |
| AL (mm) | 1.119 | 0.985 | .33 | -0.098 | -0.131 | .90 | 0.609 | 0.737 | .47 | -0.020 | -0.023 | .98 |
| ACD (mm) | -4.812 | -1.837 | .07 | -2.349 | -1.358 | .18 | -0.341 | -0.179 | .86 | -1.626 | -0.806 | .43 |
ACD = anterior chamber depth, AL = axial length, BCVA = best corrected visual acuity, IOP = intraocular pressure.
Intraocular pressure and best corrected visual acuity were measured preoperatively. BCVA was converted from the standard visual acuity table values to logMAR.
Multiple linear regression analysis for best correction visual acuity postoperatively.
| Factors | 1 wk | 1 mo | 3 mo | 6 mo | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | t | β | t | β | t |
| t | |||||
| BCVA | 0.185 | 1.434 | .16 | 0.301 | 2.833 | .007 | 0.299 | 2.875 | .007 | 0.284 | 2.837 | .007 |
| IOP (mm Hg) | -0.001 | -0.124 | .90 | -0.010 | -2.158 | .04 | -0.009 | -2.014 | .051 | -0.009 | -1.997 | .05 |
| Age (yrs) | 0.013 | 1.136 | .26 | 0.014 | 1.430 | .16 | 0.010 | 1.076 | .289 | 0.007 | 0.731 | .47 |
| Gender | 0.291 | 1.576 | .12 | 0.033 | 0.215 | .83 | 0.012 | 0.082 | .935 | -0.022 | -0.155 | .88 |
| Eyes | -0.263 | -1.623 | .11 | -0.074 | -0.550 | .59 | -0.101 | -0.771 | .446 | -0.108 | -0.861 | .40 |
| AL (mm) | 0.039 | 0.239 | .81 | -0.090 | -0.670 | .51 | -0.018 | -0.141 | .889 | 0.019 | 0.148 | .88 |
| ACD (mm) | 0.227 | 0.605 | .55 | 0.019 | 0.062 | .95 | 0.135 | 0.446 | .658 | 0.117 | 0.402 | .69 |
ACD = anterior chamber depth, AL = axial length, BCVA = best corrected visual acuity, IOP = intraocular pressure.
Intraocular pressure and best corrected visual acuity were measured preoperatively. BCVA was converted from the standard visual acuity table values to logMAR.
Comparison of the preoperative status.
| Group A | Group B | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sample number | 20 | 25 | |
| Gender | .37 | ||
| Male | 4 (20.0%) | 8 (32.0%) | |
| Female | 16 (80.0%) | 17 (68.0%) | |
| Eyes | .20 | ||
| Right eye | 9 (45.0%) | 16 (64.0%) | |
| Left eye | 11 (55.0%) | 9 (36.0%) | |
| Age (yrs) | 66.40 ± 7.27 | 67.12 ± 8.00 | .76 |
| AL (mm) | 21.95 ± 0.37 | 21.94 ± 0.63 | .94 |
| ACD (mm) | 1.66 ± 0.23 | 1.79 ± 0.23 | .08 |
| BCVA | 1.46 ± 0.70 | 1.12 ± 0.71 | .12 |
| IOP (mm Hg) | 45.55 ± 11.41 | 27.32 ± 11.60 | <.001 |
BCVA was converted from the standard visual acuity table values to logMAR.
# means chi-square test calculated P value,
means 2-sample t test calculated P value.
ACD = anterior chamber depth, AL = axial length, BCVA = best corrected visual acuity, IOP = intraocular pressure.
Comparison of intraocular pressure postoperatively between the 2 groups.
| IOP (mm Hg) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 wk | 1 mo | 3 mo | 6 mo | |
| Group A | 14.55 ± 3.85 | 12.40 ± 1.64 | 12.55 ± 1.23 | 13.60 ± 1.10 |
| Group B | 14.08 ± 2.87 | 14.48 ± 2.33 | 15.24 ± 2.49 | 16.68 ± 2.58 |
| t | 0.470 | -3.379 | -4.727 | -5.397 |
| .64 | .002 | <.001 | <.001 | |
The 2-sample t test calculated P value. IOP = intraocular pressure.
Comparison of best corrected visual acuity postoperatively between the 2 groups.
| BCVA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 wk | 1 mo | 3 mo | 6 mo | |
| Group A | 0.90 ± 0.52 | 0.43 ± 0.17 | 0.31 ± 0.14 | 0.25 ± 0.14 |
| Group B | 0.83 ± 0.54 | 0.69 ± 0.54 | 0.576 ± 0.5294 | 0.50 ± 0.4992 |
| t | 0.450 | -2.272 | -2.413 | -2.384 |
| .66 | .03 | .02 | .02 | |
The 2 sample t test calculated P value. BCVA was converted from the standard visual acuity table values to logMAR.
BCVA = best corrected visual acuity.
Comparison of intraocular pressure and best corrected visual acuity preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively.
| IOP (mm Hg) | BCVA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | Group B | Group A | Group B | |
| Preoperatively | 45.55 ± 11.41 | 27.32 ± 11.60 | 1.46 ± 0.70 | 1.12 ± 0.71 |
| Postoperatively | 13.60 ± 1.10 | 16.68 ± 2.58 | 0.25 ± 0.14 | 0.50 ± 0.4992 |
| t | 12.611 | 4.715 | 8.279 | 5.579 |
| <.001 | <.001 | <.001 | <.001 | |
The paired t test calculated P value. Postoperative follow-up time was 6 months after surgery. BCVA was converted from the standard visual acuity table values to logMAR.
BCVA = best corrected visual acuity, IOP = intraocular pressure.