| Literature DB >> 36221271 |
Jianan Hou1, Yanhong Li2, Yanan Wu1, Yuwan Liu1, Qingqing Chen1, Yanli Li3, Wei Hao3.
Abstract
Background: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is an age-related condition and its prevalence has increased as China's population ages. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the gold standard for treating moderate to severe BPH. Routine placement of a urinary catheter after TURP is often associated with catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD). The development of CRBD is related to an increased synthesis of prostaglandin (PG), and wrist-ankle acupuncture (WAA) can inhibit the expression of PG at the site of inflammation, thus alleviating CRBD symptoms. Here we evaluated the efficacy of WAA in alleviating CRBD in patients undergoing TURP.Entities:
Keywords: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH); catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD); traditional Chinese medicine; transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP); wrist-ankle acupuncture (WAA)
Year: 2022 PMID: 36221271 PMCID: PMC9547715 DOI: 10.21037/gs-22-438
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gland Surg ISSN: 2227-684X
Figure 1Flowchart of subject enrollment. WAA, wrist-ankle acupuncture.
General data of the WAA and control groups
| Group | Age (years), | BMI (kg/m2), | IPSS score (points), | Prostate volume (mL), M (Q) | Hypertension, (N) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAA group (n=23) | 73.09±7.35 | 22.66±3.06 | 28.09±3.52 | 86 (17.0) | 8 |
| Control group (n=21) | 73.57±7.08 | 23.80±3.42 | 28.78±3.82 | 95 (54.0) | 11 |
| T/Z/c2 | 0.23a | 1.19a | 0.64a | 0.28b | 0.81c |
| P value | 0.82 | 0.24 | 0.52 | 0.78 | 0.37 |
Note: a, F value; b, Z value; c, χ2 value. WAA, wrist-ankle acupuncture; BMI, body mass index; IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score.
Comparison of the severity of CRBD between the WAA and control groups [n (%)]
| Time | n | Group | Light | Moderate | Heavy | Overall incidence | Z | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 23 | WAA group | 8 (34.8%) | 15 (65.2%) | 0 | 100% | 0.30 | 0.76 |
| 23 | Control group | 9 (39.1%) | 14 (60.9%) | 0 | 100% | |||
| T2 | 23 | WAA group | 7 (30.4%) | 1 (4.3%) | 0 | 34.8% | 2.61 | 0.01 |
| 21 | Control group | 6 (28.6%) | 13 (61.9%) | 2 (9.5%) | 100% | |||
| T3 | 23 | WAA group | 5 (21.7%) | 0 | 0 | 21.7% | 2.91 | 0.00 |
| 21 | Control group | 5 (23.8%) | 14 (66.7%) | 1 (4.8%) | 95.2% | |||
| T4 | 23 | WAA group | 2 (8.7%) | 0 | 0 | 8.7% | 3.14 | 0.00 |
| 21 | Control group | 11 (52.4%) | 0 | 0 | 52.4% |
CRBD, catheter-related bladder discomfort; WAA, wrist-ankle acupuncture.
Comparison of the VAS score between these two groups (n=44, , points)
| Group | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAA group | 2.22±1.70 | 0.74±1.18 | 0.52±1.04 | 0.22±0.60 |
| Control group | 2.38±1.72 | 2.86±1.39 | 2.33±1.62 | 1.57±1.53 |
| F | 0.10 | 29.97 | 19.80 | 15.35 |
| P value | 0.75 | * | * | * |
Note: *, P<0.001. VAS, Visual Analog Scale; WAA, wrist-ankle acupuncture.
Figure 2VAS scores at different time points. VAS, Visual Analog Scale.
Comparisons of vital signs between the WAA and control groups (n=44, )
| Parameters | Group | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAP (mmHg) | WAA group | 97.26±10.11 | 93.61±7.37 | 93.30±5.95 | 92.78±5.74 |
| Control group | 95.76±8.99 | 97.48±7.23 | 96.81±7.28 | 96.29±7.21 | |
| HR (f/min) | WAA group | 78.61±10.70 | 79.04±9.47 | 73.83±7.01 | 72.39±6.39 |
| Control group | 78.24±11.32 | 80.14±9.53 | 74.29±9.00 | 74.05±9.70 | |
| SPO2 (%) | WAA group | 98.30±1.40 | 99.17±0.58 | 99.39±0.58 | 99.52±0.51 |
| Control group | 98.24±1.48 | 98.71±0.96 | 99.43±0.60 | 99.48±0.60 |
WAA, wrist-ankle acupuncture; MAP, mean arterial pressure; HR, heart rate; SPO2, oxygen saturation.