Literature DB >> 36220958

A novel classification of cement distribution patterns based on plain radiographs associated with cement filling rate and relevance to the clinical results of unipedicle vertebroplasty.

Kung-Chia Li1, Ching-Hsiang Hsieh2, Ting-Hua Liao2, Bing-Hui Cheng2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cement distribution pattern following unipedicle percutaneous vertebroplasty (UVP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) has been reported in association with clinical results. The present retrospective study aimed to classify the bone cement distribution types following UVP and investigate the differences in clinical efficacy and related complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of the patients with single-segment OVCFs who underwent UVP. Cement distribution patterns were divided into the diffuse, block, double band, and single band types according to the plain radiographs and further by cement filling rate (CFR) based on a three-dimension reconstruction of post-operative CT. The cutoff values of CFR were > 34% for the diffuse, block between 34 and 20%, and each band of the double or single band < 20%. Clinical efficacy and related complications were compared among the four cement distribution types 24 h after the operation and the last follow-up.
RESULTS: A total of 155 patients with an average follow-up time of 20.3 months were included. The diffuse type included 26 patients; block, 87; double band, 18; and single band, 24. The VAS and ODI after operation improved significantly in all four groups. The diffuse and block types had similar clinical results. The clinical outcomes in the single band group were the poorest at the last follow-up. The patients with single band type also had the highest rates of body re-collapse and revision surgery for the index level.
CONCLUSION: Diffuse and block groups can better maintain the height of the vertebral body and reduce the risk of vertebral body recompression. The single band has the poorest results, and intraoperative immediate contralateral vertebroplasty was highly recommended.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone cement distribution; OVCFs; Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; Percutaneous vertebroplasty

Year:  2022        PMID: 36220958     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07412-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   2.721


  17 in total

1.  Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects.

Authors:  M E Jensen; A J Evans; J M Mathis; D F Kallmes; H J Cloft; J E Dion
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Recompression of vertebral body after balloon kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Young-Yul Kim; Kee-Won Rhyu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty].

Authors:  P Galibert; H Deramond; P Rosat; D Le Gars
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.553

4.  Evaluation of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Management of Symptomatic Osteoporotic Compression Fracture.

Authors:  Arnab Karmakar; Suchi Acharya; Dibyendu Biswas; Arkaprabha Sau
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-08-01

5.  Bone cement distribution is a potential predictor to the reconstructive effects of unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty in OVCFs: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jiachen Lin; Lie Qian; Changqing Jiang; Xiuyuan Chen; Fan Feng; Lifeng Lao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Clinical observation of two bone cement distribution modes of percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of thoracolumbar Kümmell's disease.

Authors:  Ji-Bin Chen; Ya-Ping Xiao; Dong Chen; Jian-Zhong Chang; Te Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Clinical observation of two bone cement distribution modes after percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Qiujiang Li; Xingxia Long; Yinbin Wang; Tao Guan; Xiaomin Fang; Donggeng Guo; Jinhan Lv; Xuehua Hu; Xiaocheng Jiang; Lijun Cai
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  The effect of bone cement distribution on the outcome of percutaneous Vertebroplasty: a case cohort study.

Authors:  Lei Tan; Bingtao Wen; Zhaoqing Guo; Zhongqiang Chen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Influence of bone cement distribution on outcomes following percutaneous vertebroplasty: a retrospective matched-cohort study.

Authors:  Ling Mo; Zixian Wu; Linqiang Y; Zhuoyan Cai; Jinjing Huang; Shunxin Lin; Jianchao Cui; Shuncong Zhang; Zhidong Yang; Zhensong Yao; Xiaobing Jiang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 1.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.