| Literature DB >> 36220839 |
Mansureh Ghavam1, Gianluigi Bacchetta2, Ines Castangia2, Maria Letizia Manca2.
Abstract
In this study the essential oils obtained from four different plant species belonging to the Lamiaceae family were extracted by means of hydrodistillation and their composition and antimicrobial activity were evaluated. About 66 components were identified by using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and among all, thymol (67.7%), oleic acid (0.5-62.1%), (-)-caryophyllene oxide (0.4-24.8%), α-pinene (1.1-19.4%), 1,8-cineole (0.2-15.4%), palmitic acid (0.32-13.28%), ( +)spathulenol (11.16%), and germacrene D (0.3-10.3%) were the most abundant in all the species tested (i.e. Thymus daenensis, Nepeta sessilifolia, Hymenocrater incanus, and Stachys inflata). In particular, only the composition of essential oils from H. incanus was completely detected (99.13%), while that of the others was only partially detected. Oxygenated monoterpenes (75.57%) were the main compounds of essential oil from T. daenensis; sesquiterpenes hydrocarbons (26.88%) were the most abundant in S. inflata; oxygenated sesquiterpenes (41.22%) were mainly detected in H. incanus essential oil, while the essential oil from N. sessilifolia was mainly composed of non-terpene and fatty acids (77.18%). Due to their slightly different composition, also the antibacterial activity was affected by the essential oil tested. Indeed, the highest antibacterial and antifungal activities were obtained with the essential oil from T. daenensis by means of the inhibition halo (39 ± 1 and 25 ± 0 mm) against Gram-positive strains such as Staphylococcus aureus and Aspergillus brasiliensis. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal/fungicidal concentration (MBC/MFC) of the essential oils obtained from the four species varied from 16 to 2000 μg/mL and were strictly affected by the type of microorganism tested. As an example, the essential oils from H. incanus and S. inflata were the most effective against the Gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MIC 16 and 63 μg/ml, respectively), which is considered one of the most resistant bacterial strain. Therefore, the essential oils obtained from the four species contained a suitable phytocomplexes with potential applications in different commercial area such as agriculture, food, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries. Moreover, these essential oils can be considered a valuable natural alternative to some synthetic antibiotics, thanks to their ability to control the growth of different bacteria and fungi.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36220839 PMCID: PMC9553974 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21509-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Main components and retention indice (RI) detected in the essential oils from Thymus daenensis (TD), Nepeta sessilifolia (NS), Hymenocrater incanus (HI), and Stachys inflata (SI).
| No | Compound (%) | RI | TD | NS | HI | SI | Molecular formula |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | α-Thujene | 864 | 0.85 | 0.39 | – | – | C10H16 |
| 2 | α-pinene | 871 | 1.09 | – | – | 1.52 | C10H16 |
| 3 | Camphene | 888 | 0.82 | – | – | 0.55 | C10H16 |
| 4 | Sabinene | 908 | – | 0.33 | – | – | C10H16 |
| 5 | β -pinene | 912 | 0.43 | – | – | – | C10H16 |
| 6 | β -Myrcene | 921 | 1.50 | – | – | – | C10H16 |
| 7 | α-Phellandrene | 933 | 0.28 | – | – | – | C10H16 |
| 8 | α-Terpinene | 943 | 1.71 | – | – | – | C10H16 |
| 9 | p-Cymene | 953 | 5.16 | – | – | – | C10H14 |
| 10 | 1,8-Cineole | 957 | 3.52 | 0.91 | 0.22 | 1.65 | C10H18O |
| 11 | γ-Terpinene | 980 | 6.20 | – | – | – | C10H16 |
| 12 | α-Terpinolene | 1002 | 0.26 | – | – | – | C10H16 |
| 13 | Linalool | 1013 | 0.67 | 1.45 | – | 1.20 | C10H18O |
| 14 | Camphor | 1044 | – | – | 1.67 | C10H16O | |
| 15 | Borneol | 1064 | 3.67 | – | 1.17 | C10H18O | |
| 16 | α-Terpineol | 1080 | – | 0.50 | 0.91 | C10H18O | |
| 17 | Verbenone | 1093 | 2.20 | C10H14O | |||
| 18 | Thymol | 1170 | 67.71 | C10H14O | |||
| 19 | Acetic acid, bornyl ester | 1129 | 1.29 | C12H20O2 | |||
| 20 | α-Copaene | 1191 | 0.69 | C15H24 | |||
| 21 | β- Bourbonene | 1197 | – | 1.03 | – | C15H24 | |
| 22 | β-Elemene | 1201 | – | – | 1.12 | C15H24 | |
| 23 | trans-Caryophyllene | 1224 | 2.99 | 0.67 | 3.68 | – | C15H24 |
| 24 | ( +)-Aromadendrene | 1232 | 0.15 | – | – | – | C15H24 |
| 25 | α-Humulene | 1239 | – | – | 1.50 | – | C15H24 |
| 26 | Alloaromadendrene | 1242 | – | 0.29 | – | C15H24 | |
| 27 | α-Amorphene | 1251 | – | – | 0.92 | C15H24 | |
| 28 | β-Cubebene | 1254 | – | 0.26 | – | – | C15H24 |
| 29 | Germacrene D | 1255 | – | – | 0.30 | 10.26 | C15H24 |
| 30 | Bicyclogermacrene | 1263 | – | – | 0.57 | 9.19 | C15H24 |
| 31 | β -Bisabolene | 1268 | 0.50 | – | – | – | C15H24 |
| 32 | δ-cadinene | 1277 | – | 0.34 | – | 4.7 | C15H24 |
| 33 | cis-α-Bisabolene | 1286 | 0.40 | – | – | – | C15H24 |
| 34 | Elemol | 1296 | – | 0.24 | – | – | C15H26O |
| 43 | ( +) spathulenol | 1314 | – | – | 11.16 | C15H24O | |
| 35 | (−)-Caryophyllene oxide | 1315 | 0.41 | 1.26 | 24.81 | – | C15H24O |
| 36 | Viridiflorol | 1321 | – | – | 2.26 | C15H26O | |
| 37 | (−)-Humulene epoxide II | 1330 | – | – | 3.69 | – | C15H24O |
| 38 | α-Chamigrene | 1347 | – | 2.37 | – | C15H24 | |
| 39 | α-Cadinol | 1356 | – | 7.66 | 3.25 | C15H26O | |
| 40 | Caryophyllenol-II | 1367 | – | 5.06 | – | C15H24O | |
| 41 | (3 | 1374 | – | 1.51 | C15H24O | ||
| 42 | Myristic acid | 1414 | – | 1.31 | – | C14H28O2 | |
| 43 | 2-Pentadecanone, 6,10,14-trimethyl- | 1445 | – | 1.39 | 0.89 | C18H36O | |
| 44 | Phthalic acid | 1462 | – | 0.55 | – | C8H6O4 | |
| 45 | Tridecane | 1478 | – | 0.42 | 0.45 | C13H28 | |
| 46 | Hexadecanoic acid = palmitic acid | 1515 | – | 13.28 | 12.10 | C16H32O2 | |
| 47 | Phytol | 1580 | – | 9.22 | 2.14 | C20H40O | |
| 48 | Oleic acid | 1600 | 0.49 | 62.09 | 23.53 | 20.75 | C18H34O2 |
| 49 | Stearic acid | 1627 | – | 8.16 | – | 3.89 | C18H36O2 |
| 50 | Linoleic acid | 1633 | – | 6.06 | – | – | C18H32O2 |
| 51 | Lauric acid | 1692 | – | 0.87 | – | – | C12H24O2 |
| Total | 95.77 | 84.56 | 99.13 | 97.44 | |||
| Monoterpenes hydrocarbons | 18.26 | 0.72 | 0 | 2.07 | |||
| Oxygenated monoterpenes | 75.57 | 2.86 | 0.22 | 8.8 | |||
| Sesquiterpenes hydrocarbons | 4.04 | 2.3 | 8.71 | 26.88 | |||
| Oxygenated sesquiterpenes | 0.41 | 1.5 | 41.22 | 18.18 | |||
| Others | 0.49 | 77.18 | 48.98 | 41.55 |
Figure 1GC–MS chromatogram of essential oil obtained from Thymus daenensis.
Figure 2GC–MS chromatogram of essential oil obtained from Nepeta sessilifolia.
Figure 3GC–MS chromatogram of essential oil obtained from Hymenocrater incanus.
Figure 4GC–MS chromatogram of essential oil obtained from Stachys inflata.
Inhibition-zone diameters provided by antibiotics (used as references) and the essential oils from Thymus daenensis (TD), Nepeta sessilifolia (NS), Hymenocrater incanus (HI), and Stachys inflata (SI).
| Test microorganisms | IZ (mm) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Essential oils | Antibiotics | ||||||
| TD | NS | HI | SI | Rifampin | Gentamicin | Nystatin | |
| *16 | ND | ND | ND | 9 | 17 | NA | |
| ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 20 .00 | NA | |
| *♪ 14 | *♪9 | *♪10 | *♪9 | 19 | 30 | NA | |
| *♪9 | *♪9 | *♪11 | ND | 44 | 39 | NA | |
| ♪11 | ND | ND | ND | 10 | 23 | NA | |
| *♪39 | *♪10 | ND | *♪9 | 21 | 27 | NA | |
| *18 | ND | ND | ND | 8 | 17 | NA | |
| *♪14 | ND | ND | ND | 8 | 24 | NA | |
| *♪12 | ND | ND | ND | 8 | 18 | NA | |
| Ω 12 | ND | ND | ND | NA | NA | 33 | |
| Ω 12 | ND | ND | ND | NA | NA | 27 | |
| Ω 25 | ND | ND | ND | NA | NA | 30 | |
Mean values ± standard deviations of three cultures were reported.
NA no activity, ND not determined.
Symbols (*) indicate values statistically different from rifampin, symbols (♪) indicate values statistically different from gentamicin and symbols (Ω) indicate values statistically different from nystatin (p < 0.05).
MIC obtained using antibiotics (used as references) and the essential oils from Thymus daenensis (TD), Nepeta sessilifolia (NS), Hymenocrater incanus (HI), and Stachys inflata (SI).
| Microorganisms | MIC (μg/mL) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Essential oils | Antibiotics | ||||||
| TD | NS | HI | SI | Rifampin | Gentamicin | Nystatin | |
| *♪ 500 | *♪ 125 | *♪ 63 | *♪ 125 | 16 | 4 | NA | |
| *♪ 125 | *♪ 125 | *♪ 16 | *♪ 16 | 31 | 8 | NA | |
| *♪ 125 | *♪ 250 | *♪ 500 | *♪ 125 | 31 | 4 | NA | |
| *♪ 125 | *♪ 250 | *♪ 500 | *♪ 500 | 2 | 2 | NA | |
| *♪ 125 | *♪ 500 | *♪ 250 | *♪ 125 | 16 | 31 | NA | |
| *♪ 125 | *♪ 500 | *♪ 500 | *♪ > 1000 | 31 | 2 | NA | |
| *♪ 125 | *♪ 125 | *♪ 63 | *♪ 125 | 16 | 4 | NA | |
| *♪ 250 | *♪ 250 | *♪ 500 | *♪ 250 | 16 | 16 | NA | |
| *♪ 125 | *♪ 250 | *♪ 63 | *♪ 125 | 16 | 4 | NA | |
| Ω 31 | Ω 250 | Ω 63 | Ω 500 | NA | NA | 125 | |
| Ω 250 | Ω 2000 | Ω > 2000 | Ω > 2000 | NA | NA | 31 | |
| Ω 250 b | Ω 2000 a | Ω > 2000 | Ω > 2000 | NA | NA | 31 | |
Symbols (*) indicate values statistically different from rifampin, symbols (♪) indicate values statistically different from gentamicin and symbols (Ω) indicate values statistically different from nystatin (p < 0.05).
MBC obtained using the essential oils from Thymus daenensis (TD), Nepeta sessilifolia (NS), Hymenocrater incanus (HI), and Stachys inflata (SI).
| Test microorganisms | MBC (μg/mL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Essential oils | ||||
| TD | NS | HI | SI | |
| 500 | 1000 | *63 | 1000 | |
| 125 | 125 | *16 | 250 | |
| *125 | > 1000 | 500 | 250 | |
| *125 | 250 | 500 | 500 | |
| *125 | 500 | 250 | 500 | |
| 500 | 1000 | 500 | > 1000 | |
| 250 | 125 | *63 | 1000 | |
| *250 | 500 | 500 | 500 | |
| 125 | 250 | *63 | 500 | |
| *63 | 250 | 250 | 1000 | |
| *250 | 2000 | > 2000 | > 2000 | |
| *250 | 2000 | > 2000 | > 2000 | |
Symbols (*) indicate values statistically different from the others essential oils against the same bacterial/fungal strain (p < 0.05).