Hidetoshi Shidahara1,2, Nobuaki Fujikuni3,4, Kazuaki Tanabe5, Tomoyuki Abe1, Keisuke Nishihara6, Toshio Noriyuki1, Masahiro Nakahara1. 1. Department of Surgery, Onomichi General Hospital, Onomichi, Hiroshima, Japan. 2. Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan. 3. Department of Surgery, Onomichi General Hospital, Onomichi, Hiroshima, Japan. fujikuni2292@gmail.com. 4. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan. fujikuni2292@gmail.com. 5. Department of Perioperative and Critical Care Management, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan. 6. Department of Radiology, Onomichi General Hospital, Onomichi, Hiroshima, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a routine medical emergency. The most common non-variceal cause is peptic ulcer disease, while a rare presentation is peptic ulcer-induced splenic artery pseudoaneurysm (SAP). Primary endoscopic treatment is generally attempted for UGIB; however, it sometimes fails when arterial etiology is present. In such cases, either transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) or surgery is necessary, but the choice of treatment is controversial. We present a case that illustrates the utility of both approaches in a gastric ulcer-induced SAP. CASE PRESENTATION: A 33-year-old male presented with hemorrhagic shock secondary to UGIB. The source of bleeding was identified as an SAP that was caused by a gastric ulcer. TAE enabled temporary bleeding control despite the patient's poor overall condition and limited blood transfusion capability. However, rebleeding occurred soon after stabilization. Ultimately, we performed proximal gastrectomy and splenic artery ligation, and the patient survived. CONCLUSIONS: SAP is an uncommon occurrence, and angiographic information is important for correctly identifying the source of bleeding. The treatment for SAP bleeding is basically the same as for endoscopically unmanageable non-variceal UGIB, since TAE and surgery each have a different utility, depending on the situation. If surgery is performed, especially SA ligation and gastrectomy, it is important to consider the circulation of the spleen and residual stomach. Using TAE and laparotomy, we managed to save the life of the patient with massive hemorrhage under limited circumstances.
BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a routine medical emergency. The most common non-variceal cause is peptic ulcer disease, while a rare presentation is peptic ulcer-induced splenic artery pseudoaneurysm (SAP). Primary endoscopic treatment is generally attempted for UGIB; however, it sometimes fails when arterial etiology is present. In such cases, either transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) or surgery is necessary, but the choice of treatment is controversial. We present a case that illustrates the utility of both approaches in a gastric ulcer-induced SAP. CASE PRESENTATION: A 33-year-old male presented with hemorrhagic shock secondary to UGIB. The source of bleeding was identified as an SAP that was caused by a gastric ulcer. TAE enabled temporary bleeding control despite the patient's poor overall condition and limited blood transfusion capability. However, rebleeding occurred soon after stabilization. Ultimately, we performed proximal gastrectomy and splenic artery ligation, and the patient survived. CONCLUSIONS: SAP is an uncommon occurrence, and angiographic information is important for correctly identifying the source of bleeding. The treatment for SAP bleeding is basically the same as for endoscopically unmanageable non-variceal UGIB, since TAE and surgery each have a different utility, depending on the situation. If surgery is performed, especially SA ligation and gastrectomy, it is important to consider the circulation of the spleen and residual stomach. Using TAE and laparotomy, we managed to save the life of the patient with massive hemorrhage under limited circumstances.
Authors: L Defreyne; P Vanlangenhove; M De Vos; P Pattyn; G Van Maele; J Decruyenaere; R Troisi; M Kunnen Journal: Radiology Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: R Loffroy; S Favelier; P Pottecher; L Estivalet; P Y Genson; S Gehin; J P Cercueil; D Krausé Journal: Diagn Interv Imaging Date: 2015-06-06 Impact factor: 4.026
Authors: Emma Sverdén; Fredrik Mattsson; David Lindström; Anders Sondén; Yunxia Lu; Jesper Lagergren Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Deron J Tessier; William M Stone; Richard J Fowl; Maher A Abbas; James C Andrews; Thomas C Bower; Peter Gloviczki Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Soo Buem Cho; Sung Eun Park; Chang Min Lee; Ji-Ho Park; Hye Jin Baek; Kyeong Hwa Ryu; Jin Il Moon; Bo Hwa Choi; Ji Young Ha; Sangmin Lee Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 1.889