| Literature DB >> 36217207 |
Takashi Naito1,2, Tatsuya Saito3,4, Akihisa Morito5, Satoshi Yamada5, Masatsugu Shimomasuda6, Mariko Nakamura3.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of ingesting ice slurries with two different carbohydrate contents on body temperatures and the subcutaneous interstitial fluid glucose level during heat exposure. Seven physically active men underwent one of three interventions: the ingestion of 7.5 g/kg of a control beverage (CON: 26°C), a normal-carbohydrate ice slurry (NCIS: -1°C), or a high-carbohydrate ice slurry (HCIS: -5°C). The participants were monitored for a 120-min period that included 10 min of rest, 25 min of exposure to the experimental cooling intervention (during which the beverage was ingested), and 85 min of seated rest in a climate chamber (36°C, 50% relative humidity). The rectal temperature in the HCIS and NCIS trials was lower than that in the CON trial from 40 to 75 min. The infrared tympanic temperature was also lower in the HCIS and NCIS trials than in the CON trial from 20 to 50 min, whereas the deep thigh or mean skin temperatures were not significantly different among the three groups. From 90 to 120 min, the subcutaneous interstitial fluid glucose level in the NCIS trial was lower than that at 65 min; however, reductions were not seen in the HCIS and CON trials. These findings suggest that both HCIS ingestion and conventional NCIS ingestion were effective cooling strategies for reducing thermal strain, while HCIS ingestion may also enable a higher subcutaneous interstitial fluid glucose level to be maintained, ensuring an adequate supply of required muscle substrates.Entities:
Keywords: Cooling strategy; Core temperature; Hot environments; Muscle temperature; Rest
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36217207 PMCID: PMC9549659 DOI: 10.1186/s40101-022-00309-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Physiol Anthropol ISSN: 1880-6791 Impact factor: 2.509
Fig. 1Schematic representation of the experimental protocol
The hydration state before and after experiment. Values are expressed as means ± SD (n =7)
| CON | NCIS | HCIS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | |
| 71.18 ± 5.40 | 71.24 ± 5.41 | 71.10 ± 5.86 | 71.29 ± 5.88 | 71.35 ± 5.99 | 71.78 ± 6.41 | |
| 1.019 ± 0.007 | 1.026 ± 0.005 | 1.019 ± 0.005 | 1.014 ± 0.006 | 1.019 ± 0.008 | 1.023 ± 0.008 | |
Fig. 2The rectal temperature (A), mean skin temperature (B), tympanic temperature (C), and deep thigh temperature (D) under three experimental conditions. The mean values are expressed as mean ± SD. Time × drink effect CON vs. HCIS: *P < 0.05, CON vs. NCIS: †P < 0.05, HCIS vs. NCIS: §P < 0.05
Fig. 3The subcutaneous interstitial fluid glucose under three experimental conditions. The mean values are expressed as mean ± SD. Dotted line reported by The American Diabetes Association [25]. Time × drink effect vs. in the CON trial: *P < 0.05 vs. in the HCIS trial: †P < 0.05 vs. 65 min in the NCIS trial: §P < 0.05
Ratings of thermal sensation and comfort during experiment. Values are expressed as means ± SD (n =7)
| Time | 0 min | 20 min | 30 min | 40 min | 70 min | 100 min | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.0 ± 0.9 | 7.6 ± 0.7 | 8.0 ± 0.5 | 8.1 ± 0.4 | 8.3 ± 0.5 | 8.3 ± 0.5 | ||
| 7.1 ± 1.1 | 6.5 ± 0.8† | 6.1 ± 1.1† | 6.3 ± 0.9† | 7.6 ± 0.5† | 8.4 ± 0.5 | ||
| 6.9 ± 1.1 | 6.3 ± 1.5 | 6.4 ± 1.4* | 6.8 ± 1.0* | 7.9 ± 1.0 | 8.3 ± 0.7 | ||
| 3.1 ± 0.6 | 2.5 ± 0.8 | 2.0 ± 0.8 | 2.1 ± 0.6 | 2.0 ± 0.5 | 1.9 ± 0.6 | ||
| 2.9 ± 0.6 | 3.4 ± 0.5† | 3.5 ± 0.5† | 3.5 ± 0.5† | 2.4 ± 0.7 | 1.8 ± 0.7 | ||
| 3.4 ± 0.7 | 3.8 ± 1.0* | 3.3 ± 1.0* | 3.1 ± 1.0* | 2.3 ± 0.7 | 2.1 ± 0.8 |
Time × drink effect CON vs. HCIS: *P < 0.05, CON vs. NCIS: †P < 0.05