| Literature DB >> 36217135 |
Chao Liu1,2, Hao Chen1,2, Fang Zhou1, Qiqi Long3, Kan Wu2,4, Liang-Ming Lo5, Tai-Ho Hung5, Chia-Yih Liu6, Wen-Ko Chiou7,8,9.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effects of mobile health application designed based on mindfulness and social support theory on parenting self-efficacy and postpartum depression symptoms of puerperae.Entities:
Keywords: Maternal parental self-efficacy; Mindfulness; Mobile health application; Perceived social support; Postpartum depressive symptoms
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36217135 PMCID: PMC9549653 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01996-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Womens Health ISSN: 1472-6874 Impact factor: 2.742
Demographic characteristics of participants
| Total (n = 130) | App group (n = 65) | Control group (n = 65) | χ2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic n(%) | |||||
| Age (SD) | 31.81 (5.36) | 30.32 (5.21) | 33.29 (5.15) | 0.869 | 0.351 |
| Non-senior age (< 35) | 87 (66.9%) | 46 (70.8%) | 41 (63.1%) | ||
| Senior age (≥ 35) | 43 (33.1%) | 19 (29.2%) | 24 (36.9%) | ||
| Education level | |||||
| High school or below | 5 (3.8%) | 3 (4.6%) | 2 (3.1%) | 0.647 | 0.724 |
| University | 92 (70.8%) | 44 (67.7%) | 48 (73.8%) | ||
| Master degree or above | 33 (25.4%) | 18 (27.7%) | 15 (23.1%) | ||
| Employment situation | |||||
| Full time | 98 (75.4%) | 52 (80%) | 46 (70.8%) | 1.534 | 0.464 |
| Part time | 8 (6.1%) | 3 (4.6%) | 5 (7.7%) | ||
| Housewife | 24 (18.5%) | 10 (15.4%) | 14 (21.5%) | ||
| Monthly household income | |||||
| Under 3000 RMB | 23 (16.9) | 18 (27.7%) | 15 (23.1%) | 0.789 | 0.852 |
| 3000–5000 RMB | 32 (25.4%) | 17 (26.1%) | 15 (23.1%) | ||
| 5000–10,000 RMB | 32 (24.6%) | 10 (15.4%) | 12 (18.4%) | ||
| Over 10,000 RMB | 43 (33.1%) | 20 (30.8%) | 23 (35.4%) | ||
| Mode of delivery | |||||
| Natural birth | 89 (68.5%) | 48 (73.8%) | 41 (63.1%) | 1.746 | 0.186 |
| Caesarean birth | 41 (31.5%) | 17 (26.2%) | 24 (36.9%) | ||
| First production | |||||
| Yes | 78 (60%) | 38 (58.5%) | 40 (61.5%) | 0.128 | 0.720 |
| No | 52 (40%) | 27 (41.5%) | 25 (38.5%) | ||
| Planned pregnancy | |||||
| Yes | 97 (74.6%) | 46 (70.8%) | 51 (78.5%) | 1.015 | 0.314 |
| No | 33 (25.4%) | 19 (29.2%) | 14 (21.5%) | ||
| Full-term pregnancy | |||||
| Yes | 116 (89.2%) | 60 (92.3%) | 56 (86.2%) | 1.281 | 0.258 |
| No | 14 (10.8%) | 5 (7.7%) | 9 (13.8%) | ||
| Postpartum complications | |||||
| Yes | 18 (13.8%) | 7 (10.8%) | 11 (16.9%) | 1.032 | 0.310 |
| No | 112 (86.2%) | 58 (89.2%) | 54 (83.1%) | ||
| Baby sex | |||||
| Male | 72 (55.4%) | 34 (52.3%) | 38 (58.5%) | 0.498 | 0.480 |
| Female | 58 (44.6%) | 31 (47.7%) | 27 (41.5%) | ||
| Is the baby abnormal | |||||
| Yes | 12 (9.2%) | 8 (12.3%) | 4 (6.2%) | 1.469 | 0.226 |
| No | 118 (90.8%) | 57 (87.7%) | 61 (93.8%) | ||
| Feeding mode | |||||
| Breast milk | 67 (51.5%) | 31 (47.7%) | 36 (55.4%) | 1.065 | 0.587 |
| Artificial | 24 (18.5%) | 14 (21.5%) | 10 (15.4%) | ||
| Blend | 39 (30%) | 20 (30.8%) | 19 (29.2%) | ||
| Postpartum supplementary parenting | |||||
| Without assistance | 10 (7.7%) | 6 (9.2%) | 4 (6.1%) | 3.316 | 0.506 |
| Parents and relatives | 36 (27.7%) | 14 (21.5%) | 21 (32.3%) | ||
| Hire a nanny | 33 (25.4%) | 18 (27.7%) | 15 (23.1%) | ||
| Postpartum care center | 17 (13.1%) | 7 (10.8%) | 10 (15.4%) | ||
| Two or more kinds of auxiliary | 34 (26.1%) | 20 (30.8%) | 15 (23.1%) | ||
Fig. 1Interface of We’ll App
Fig. 2Procedure flow chart
Fig. 3Comparison of 4 measures between App and Control Group. EPDS, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; PMPS, perceived maternal parental self-efficacy tool; MSPSS, perceived social support scale; MAAS, Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale
Means and standard deviations for each measure of each group, pre and post assessment
| Group | Measures | Mean (SD) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | T1 | T1–T0 | ||
| APP (n = 65) | EPDS | 1.308 (0.569) | 1.094 (0.441) | − 0.214 (0.378)*** |
| PMPS | 2.727 (0.669) | 2.996 (0.781) | 0.269 (0.360)*** | |
| MSPSS | 4.810 (0.949) | 5.232 (0.866) | 0.422 (0.712)*** | |
| MAAS | 3.305 (0.849) | 3.430 (0.776) | 0.126 (0.683) | |
| Control (n = 65) | EPDS | 1.352 (0.543) | 1.399 (0.516) | 0.047 (0.468) |
| PMPS | 2.552 (0.795) | 2.662 (0.715) | 0.111 (0.510) | |
| MSPSS | 4.719 (0.837) | 4.827 (0.818) | 0.108 (0.567) | |
| MAAS | 3.502 (0.948) | 3.489 (0.940) | − 0.013 (0.794) | |
T0, pre-test; T1, post-test; EPDS, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; PMPS, perceived maternal parental self-efficacy tool; MSPSS, perceived social support scale; MAAS, Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale
***p < 0.001
Comparison of total EPDS score greater than 9 between the two groups
| Test | Total | App group | Control group | χ2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | 96 (73.8%) | 47 (72.3%) | 49 (75.4%) | 0.451 | 0.502 |
| Post | 93 (71.5%) | 41 (63.1%) | 52 (80.0%) |
EPDS, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale