Literature DB >> 36215470

The importance of internal climate variability in climate impact projections.

Kevin Schwarzwald1, Nathan Lenssen1,2.   

Abstract

Uncertainty in climate projections is driven by three components: scenario uncertainty, intermodel uncertainty, and internal variability. Although socioeconomic climate impact studies increasingly take into account the first two components, little attention has been paid to the role of internal variability, although underestimating this uncertainty may lead to underestimating the socioeconomic costs of climate change. Using large ensembles from seven coupled general circulation models with a total of 414 model runs, we partition the climate uncertainty in classic dose-response models relating county-level corn yield, mortality, and per-capita gross domestic product to temperature in the continental United States. The partitioning of uncertainty depends on the time frame of projection, the impact model, and the geographic region. Internal variability represents more than 50% of the total climate uncertainty in certain projections, including mortality projections for the early 21st century, although its relative influence decreases over time. We recommend including uncertainty due to internal variability for many projections of temperature-driven impacts, including early-century and midcentury projections, projections in regions with high internal variability such as the Upper Midwest United States, and impacts driven by nonlinear relationships.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate impacts; climate projections; climate variability; uncertainty quantification

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36215470      PMCID: PMC9586330          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2208095119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  6 in total

Review 1.  Sea surface temperature variability: patterns and mechanisms.

Authors:  Clara Deser; Michael A Alexander; Shang-Ping Xie; Adam S Phillips
Journal:  Ann Rev Mar Sci       Date:  2010

2.  Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change.

Authors:  Wolfram Schlenker; Michael J Roberts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States.

Authors:  Solomon Hsiang; Robert Kopp; Amir Jina; James Rising; Michael Delgado; Shashank Mohan; D J Rasmussen; Robert Muir-Wood; Paul Wilson; Michael Oppenheimer; Kate Larsen; Trevor Houser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Global warming: Improve economic models of climate change.

Authors:  Richard L Revesz; Peter H Howard; Kenneth Arrow; Lawrence H Goulder; Robert E Kopp; Michael A Livermore; Michael Oppenheimer; Thomas Sterner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Social and economic impacts of climate.

Authors:  Tamma A Carleton; Solomon M Hsiang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  An Assessment of Earth's Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence.

Authors:  S C Sherwood; M J Webb; J D Annan; K C Armour; P M Forster; J C Hargreaves; G Hegerl; S A Klein; K D Marvel; E J Rohling; M Watanabe; T Andrews; P Braconnot; C S Bretherton; G L Foster; Z Hausfather; A S von der Heydt; R Knutti; T Mauritsen; J R Norris; C Proistosescu; M Rugenstein; G A Schmidt; K B Tokarska; M D Zelinka
Journal:  Rev Geophys       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 24.946

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.