| Literature DB >> 36213851 |
Smitha Reddy1, Sravya Gadhiraju1, Akram Quraishi1, Shekhar Kamishetty1.
Abstract
Targeted endodontic microsurgery combines a precisely designed three-dimensional (3D)-printed surgical guide in which the osteotomy site and angulation is defined preoperatively to avoid damaging anatomically important structures. The current endodontic microsurgical procedures have been progressing in pace with technological advances as a predictable alternative to nonsurgical treatment of persistent and recurrent apical periodontitis. The 3D-printed template has been used earlier in the guided endodontic procedure (access openings). The endodontic microsurgery utilizes the surgical microscope and microsurgical instruments which help in enhanced magnification, illumination, and visualization compared to conventional endodontic surgery. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) plays an important role in surgical endodontics as it helps in measuring the distance between the cortical plate and the apex, position of the roots within the bone, and the proximity of vital structures can be assessed. The true size, location, and extent of the periapical lesion can also be appreciated preoperatively. In the present cases, the guide allowed the clinicians to precisely reach the targeted tissues in a faster and more accurate manner with a more conservative and less traumatic treatment procedure. A 1-year CBCT follow-up of both cases showed complete 3D healing of the surgical site. Copyright:Entities:
Keywords: Cone-beam computed tomography; endodontic microsurgery; guided surgery; mineral trioxide aggregate; three-dimensional–printed template
Year: 2022 PMID: 36213851 PMCID: PMC9533388 DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_345_21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contemp Clin Dent ISSN: 0976-2361
Timeline of history
| Case 1 | Case 2 |
|---|---|
| 1st visit | 1st visit |
CBCT: Cone beam computed tomography
Figure 1(Case report 1) (a) Radiograph after endodontic treatment. (b and c) Cone beam computed tomography images showing lesion dimension in sagittal and axial view. (d) Template designing using implant planning software (Bluesky). (e) Fabricated surgical template. (f) Checking the fit of the template. (g) Flap reflection. (h) Osteotomy procedure through the port. (i) Root-end preparation and filling. (j) Immediate postoperative radiograph. (k) 1-year follow-up radiograph. (l) 1-year follow-up cone beam computed tomography image
Figure 2(Case report 2) (a) Preoperative radiograph. (b) Cone beam computed tomography images showing lesion dimension in sagittal view. (c) Template designing using implant planning software (Bluesky). (d) Fabricated surgical template. (e) Radiograph after endodontic treatment. (f) Checking the fit of the template. (g) Osteotomy procedure through the port. (h) Root-end preparation and filling. (i) After suturing. (j) Immediate postoperative radiograph. (k) 1-year follow-up radiograph. (l) 1-year follow-up cone beam computed tomography image